ファミリー・インターナショナルでの児童性的虐待に関する議論

ウィキペディア小見出し辞書

ファミリー・インターナショナルでの児童性的虐待に関する議論

出典: フリー百科事典『ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 (2021/10/23 07:45 UTC 版)

「リッキー・ロドリゲス」の記事における「ファミリー・インターナショナルでの児童性的虐待に関する議論」の解説

ロドリゲスが児童性的虐待にさらされたかについて議論があった。1994年のDavid Millikanによるインタビュー"Story of Davidito"で、当時まだファミリー・インターナショナルのメンバーだったロドリゲスは、"People feel that the sexual activities I had occurred so much more than it really did. They believe it had a bigger emphasis and played a greater part than it did. If they think my early life revolved around sex it's going to seem very weird, but I know this wasn't the case, だから、自分にとっては大きな問題はない"と言った。 Millikanは、また「彼には、性的虐待の法的な定義では、彼とのセックスに参加したサラや他の女性は有罪になるだろうと指摘した」と記述した。 ファミリー・インターナショナルの出費と編集によって発刊された Sex, Slander and Salvation と題する本において、w:Lawrence Lillistonは以下のように述べている。 「 The Davidito book does relate David's early witnessing of sexual behavior and encouragement to explore his own sexuality, and while these experiences would be characterized as sexually abusive or neglectful by most child abuse experts, there is no report of his having been actively molested or abused by adults. Moreover, there is no evidence of long-term negative effects on David. The first author, a clinical child psychologist with thirty years of experience, recently administered a w:psychological evaluation to David, who is now nineteen, and found him to be a bright, well-adjusted, and emotionally strong young man. 」 しかし、イギリスでの、ファミリー・インターナショナルを含んだ親権を争う裁判においての証言で、Lillistonが自身の結論を提出しようとしたところ、裁判長を務めるAlan Ward判事は以下のように述べた。 「 [Lilliston's observations of another young man born in the Family] seem to me to be superficial and to lack academic credibility. Likewise his conclusion about Davidito. This was an opportunity to explore exactly what had taken place in Berg's household. He merely touched upon these matters and Davidito made it obvious he was not prepared to talk about it. Nor did they talk about the reasons which impelled that young man [Ricky Rodriguez, aka Davidito] to make attempts on his life said by The Family to have been caused by Satanic influences. Because I conclude that Dr Lilliston was not too concerned critically to examine The Family's past, I cannot be sure I get an accurate picture from him. 」