The Mitchell Report
出典: フリー百科事典『ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 (2022/05/15 10:10 UTC 版)
「第2次インティファーダ」の記事における「The Mitchell Report」の解説
The Sharm el-Sheikh Fact-Finding Committee（和平プロセスの断絶の原因を調査するための委員会。委員長はGeorge J. Mitchell）が2001年5月にレポートを発表した。 Mitchell Reportにおいて、イスラエル政府は以下の通りに主張した。 The immediate catalyst for the violence was the breakdown of the Camp David negotiations on July 25, 2000, and the "widespread appreciation in the international community of Palestinian responsibility for the impasse". In this view, Palestinian violence was planned by the PA leadership, and was aimed at "provoking and incurring Palestinian casualties as a means of regaining the diplomatic initiative". パレスチナ解放機構は、同じレポートによれば、インティファーダを計画したことを否定し、"Camp David represented nothing less than an attempt by Israel to extend the force it exercises on the ground to negotiations."と主張した。 The report also stated: From the perspective of the PLO, Israel responded to the disturbances with excessive and illegal use of deadly force against demonstrators; behavior which, in the PLO's view, reflected Israel's contempt for the lives and safety of Palestinians. For Palestinians, the widely seen images of Muhammad al-Durrah in Gaza on September 30, shot as he huddled behind his father, reinforced that perception. The Mitchell report concluded: The Sharon visit did not cause the "Al-Aqsa Intifada". But it was poorly timed and the provocative effect should have been foreseen; indeed it was foreseen by those who urged that the visit be prohibited. and also: We have no basis on which to conclude that there was a deliberate plan by the PA to initiate a campaign of violence at the first opportunity; or to conclude that there was a deliberate plan by the [Government of Israel] to respond with lethal force.
※この「The Mitchell Report」の解説は、「第2次インティファーダ」の解説の一部です。
「The Mitchell Report」を含む「第2次インティファーダ」の記事については、「第2次インティファーダ」の概要を参照ください。
- The Mitchell Reportのページへのリンク
