Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Definition of historical models of gene function and their relation to students’ understanding of genetics

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Models are often used when teaching science. In this paper historical models and students’ ideas about genetics are compared. The historical development of the scientific idea of the gene and its function is described and categorized into five historical models of gene function. Differences and similarities between these historical models are made explicit. Internal and external consistency problems between the models are identified and discussed. From the consistency analysis seven epistemological features are identified. The features vary in such ways between the historical models that it is claimed that learning difficulties might be the consequence if these features are not explicitly addressed when teaching genetics. Students’ understanding of genetics, as described in science education literature, is then examined. The comparison shows extensive parallelism between students’ alternative understanding of genetics and the epistemological features, i.e., the claim is strengthened. It is also argued that, when teaching gene function, the outlined historical models could be useful in a combined nature of science and history of science approach. Our findings also raise the question what to teach in relation to preferred learning outcomes in genetics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick F, Lederman NG (2000) The influence of science courses on students’ views of nature of science. J Res Sci Teach 37(10):1057–1095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahar M, Johnstone AH, Hansell MH (1999) Revisiting learning difficulties in biology. J Biol Educ 33(2):84–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Banet E, Ayuso E (2000) Teaching genetics at secondary school: a strategy for teaching about the location of inheritance information. Sci Educ 84(3):313–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulter C, Buckley B (2000) Constructing a typology of models for science education. In: Gilbert J, Boulter C (eds) Developing models in science education. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 41–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadogan A (eds) (2000) Biological nomenclature—standard terms and expressions used in the teaching of biology, 3rd edn. The Institute of Biology, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson EA (1966) The gene: a critical history. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia and London

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson EA (1991) Defining the gene: an evolving concept. J Hum Genet 49(2):475–487

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson EA (2004) Mendel’s legacy: the origin of classical genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavallo AML (1996) Meaningful learning, reasoning ability, and students understanding and problem solving of topics in genetics. J Res Sci Teach 33(6):625–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich MR (2000) From gene to genetic hierarchy: richard goldschmidt and the problem of the Gene. In: Beurton P, Falk R, Rheinberger HJ (eds) The concept of the gene in development and evolution: historical and epistemological perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 91–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutilh BE, Huynen MA, Snel B (2006) A global definition of expression context is conserved between orthologs, but does not correlate with sequence conservation. BMC Genomics 7(10), http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471–2164/7/12

  • Falk R (2000) The gene—a concept in tension. In: Beurton P, Falk R, Rheinberger HJ (eds) The concept of the gene in development and evolution: historical and epistemological perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 317–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkel EA (1996) Making sense of genetics: students’ knowledge use during problem solving in a high school genetics class. J Res Sci Teach 33(4):345–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fogle T (1990) Are genes units of inheritance? Biol Philos 5(3):349–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fogle T (2000) The dissolution of protein coding genes in molecular biology. In: Beurton P, Falk R, Rheinberger HJ (eds) The concept of the gene in development and evolution: historical and epistemological perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 3–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Forissier T, Clément P (2003) Teaching biological identity as genome/environment interactions. J Biol Educ 37(2):85–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox Keller E (2000) Decoding the genetic program: or, some circular logic in the logic of circularity. In: Beurton P, Falk R, Rheinberger HJ (eds) The concept of the gene in development and evolution: historical and epistemological perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 159–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaudillière JP, Rheinberger HJ (2004) Introduction. In: Gaudillière JP, Rheinberger HJ (eds) From molecular genetics to genomics: the mapping cultures of twentieth-century genetics. Routledge, London and New York, pp. 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Gayon J (2000) From measurement to organization: a philosophical scheme for the history of the concept of heredity. In: Beurton P, Falk R, Rheinberger HJ (eds) The concept of the gene in development and evolution: historical and epistemological perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 69–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere RN (1988) Explaining science. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere RN (1994) The cognitive structure of scientific theories. Philos Sci 61:276–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Gifford F (2000) Gene concepts and genetic concepts. In: Beurton P, Falk R, Rheinberger HJ (eds) The concept of the gene in development and evolution: historical and epistemological perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 40–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert JK, Boulter C, Rutherford M (1998) Models in explanations, part 1: horses for courses? Int J Sci Educ 20(1):83–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert J, Boulter C, Elmer R (2000) Positioning models in science education and in design and technology education. In: Gilbert J, Boulter C (eds) Developing models in science education. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 3–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert SW (1991) Model building and a definition of science. J Res Sci Teach 28(1):73–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griesemer JR (2000) Reproduction and the reduction of genetics. In: Beurton P, Falk R, Rheinberger HJ (eds) The concept of the gene in development and evolution: historical and epistemological perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 240–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths PE (2002) Lost: one gene concept. Reward to finder. Biol Philos 17(2):271–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths PE, Neumann-Held EN (1999) The many faces of the gene. Bioscience 49:656–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosslight L, Unger C, Jay E, Smith C (1991) Understanding models and their use in science; conceptions of middle and high school students and experts. J Res Sci Teach 28(9):799–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halldén O (1990) Questions asked in common sense contexts and in scientific contexts. In: Lijnse PL, Licht P, de Vos W, Waarlo AJ (eds) Relating macroscopic phenomena to microscopic particles. CD-β Press, Utrecht, pp. 119–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Halloun IA (2004) Modeling theory in science education. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré R (1970) The principles of scientific thinking. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison AG, Treagust DF (2000) A typology of school science models. Int J Sci Educ 22(9):1011–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer J (1988) Naturen I huvudet. Rabén & Sjögren, Simrishamn, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone AH, Mahmoud NA (1980) Isolating topics of high perceived difficulty in school biology. J Biol Educ 14(2):163–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Justi R (2000) Teaching with historical models. In: Gilbert J, Boulter C (eds) Developing models in science education. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 209–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Justi R, Gilbert JK (1999) A cause of a historical science teaching: use of hybrid models. Sci Educ 83(2):163–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kincaid H (1990) Molecular biology and the unity of science. Philos Sci 57:575–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinnear J (1991) Using an historical perspective to enrich the teaching of linkage in genetics. Sci Educ 75(1):69–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher P (1982) Genes. Br J Philos Sci 33(4):337–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knippels MCPJ (2002) Coping with the abstract and complex nature of genetics in biology education. CD-β Press, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn D, Amsel E, O’Loughlin M (1988) The development of scientific thinking skills. Academic Press Inc., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn TS (1996) The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd edn. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence PA (1992) The making of a fly: the genetics of animal design. Blackwell Scientific, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Leatherdale WH (1974) The role of analogy, model and metaphor in science. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman NG (1992) Students and teachers conceptions of the nature of science: a review of the research. J Res Sci Teach 29(4):331–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis J, Leach J, Wood-Robinson C (2000a) All in the genes?—young people’s understanding of the nature of genes. J Biol Educ 34(2):74–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis J, Leach J, Wood-Robinson C (2000b) Chromosomes: the missing link – young people’s understanding of mitosis, meiosis, and fertilisation. J Biol Educ 34(4):189–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis J, Kattmann U (2004) Traits, genes, particles and information: re-visiting students’ understandings of genetics. Int J Sci Educ 26(2):195–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis J, Wood-Robinson C (2000) Genes, chromosomes, cell division and inheritance—do students see any relationship. Int J Sci Educ 22(2):177–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marbach-Ad G (2001) Attempting to break the code in student comprehension of genetic concepts. J Biol Educ 35(4):183–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Marbach-Ad G, Stavy R (2000) Students cellular and molecular explanations of genetic phenomena. J Biol Educ 34(4):200–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins I, Ogborn J (1997) Metaphorical reasoning about genetics. Int J Sci Educ 19(1):47–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews M (1992) History, philosophy and science teaching: the present rapprochement. Sci Educ 1(1):11–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E (1982) The growth of biological thought: diversity, evolution and inheritance. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E (1997) This is biology: the science of the living world. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Nersessian NJ (1992) How do scientists think? capturing the dynamics of conceptual change in science. In: Giere RN (ed) Cognitive models of science. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, pp. 3–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Pashley M (1994) A-level students: their problem with gene and allele. J Biol Educ 28(2):120–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Passmore C, Stewart J (2002) A modeling approach to teaching evolutionary biology in high schools. J Res Sci Teach 39(3):185–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portin P (1993) The concept of the gene: short history and present status. Q Rev Biol 68(2):173–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rheinberger HJ (2000) Gene concepts: fragments from the perspective of molecular biology. In: Beurton P, Falk R, Rheinberger HJ (eds) The concept of the gene in development and evolution: historical and epistemological perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 219–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg A (1985) The structure of biological science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg A (2000) Philosophy of science: a contemporary introduction. Routledge, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth M (1995) Authentic school science. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar S (1999) From Reaktionsnorm to the adaptive norm: the norm of reaction, 1909–1960. Biol Philos 14:235–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz S (2000) The differential concept of the gene: past and present. In: Beurton P, Falk R, Rheinberger HJ (eds) The concept of the gene in development and evolution: historical and epistemological perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 24–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer M, Berg P (1991) Genes and genomes: a changing perspective. University Science Books, Mill Valley

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart J, Hafner R (1991) Extending the conception of problem in problem-solving research. Sci Educ 75(1):105–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart J, Rudolph JL (2001) Considering the nature of scientific problems when teaching science curricula. Sci Educ 85(3):207–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Driel JH, Verloop N (1999) Teachers knowledge of models and modelling in science. Int J Sci Educ 21(11):1141–1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venville GJ, Treagust DF (1998) Exploring conceptual change in genetics using a multidimensional interpretive framework. J Res Sci Teach 35(9):1031–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters KC (1994) Genes made molecular. Philos Sci 61(2):163–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber M (1998) Representing genes: classical mapping techniques and the growth of genetic knowledge. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 29:295–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber M (2004) Walking on the chromosome: Drosophila and the molecularization of development. In: Gaudillière JP, Rheinberger HJ (eds) From molecular genetics to genomics: the mapping cultures of twentieth-century genetics. Routledge, London and New York, pp. 63–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt WC (1987) False models as means to truer theories. In: Nitecki MH, Hoffman A (eds) Neutral models in biology. Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford, pp. 23–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood-Robinson C (1994) Young people’s ideas about inheritance and evolution. Stud Sci Educ 24:29–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood-Robinson C, Lewis J, Leach J (2000) Young peoples understanding of genetic information in the cells of an organism. J Biol Educ 35(1):29–35

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Niklas Markus Gericke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gericke, N.M., Hagberg, M. Definition of historical models of gene function and their relation to students’ understanding of genetics. Sci & Educ 16, 849–881 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9064-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9064-4

Keywords

Navigation