Skip to main content
Log in

Faking personality questionnaires: Fabricating different profiles for different purposes

  • Articles
  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over fifty subjects completed four personality measures used in personnel selection. Based on a latin-square design they were asked to fill them in as they would if they were trying to present themselves as ideal candidates for the job of librarian, advertising executive or banker, while on one questionnaire they gave “honest,” actual responses. The results indicated, as previous research in this area has shown, that the questionnaires are all highly susceptible to faking, and that a quite different prototypic profile arose for each of the three different jobs. The results are discussed in terms of the templates of fakers for specific jobs; the methods of detecting fakers, and what dissimulation studies tell us about theories of both occupations and personality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Archer, R., Gordon, R., & Kirchner, F. (1987). MMPI response—set characteristics among adolescents.Journal of Personality Assessment, 51, 506–516.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs-Myers, L., & McCauley, M. (1985).A Guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type indicator. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologist Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burbeck, E., & Furnham, A. (1984). Personality and police selection: Trait differences in successful and non-successful applicants to the Metropolitan Police.Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 257–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. (1969).The 16 PF, Form D, 1969 Edition, Windsor; N.F.E.R. Furnham, A. (1986A). The Social responsibility of the Type A behaviour pattern.Psychological Medicine, 16, 805–811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. (1986B). Response bias, social desirability and dissimulation.Personality and Individual Differences, 7, 385–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. (1986).Lay Theories. Pergamon: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. (1990). The fakeability of the 16 PF, Myers-Briggs and FIRO-B personality measures.Personality and Individual Differences. In Press.

  • Furnham A., & Craig, S. (1987). Fakeability and correlates of the Perception and Preference inventory.Personality and Individual Differences, 8, 459–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., & Henderson, M. (1982). The good, the bad and the mad: response bias in self-report measures.Personality and Individual Differences, 3, 311–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirton, M. (1976). Adaptors and Innovators: A description and measure.Journal of Applied Psychology, 622–629.

  • Kostick, M. (1977).Kosticks Perception and Preference Inventory. Brookline, Mass.: Applied Psychology Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. (1973).Making Vocational Choices: A theory of Careers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. (1985).Vocational Preferences Inventory. Odessa, Florida: PAR Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, G. (1968). Stereotypic desirability profiles for the 16 PF questionnaire.Psychological Reports, 23, 1173–1174.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, I., & McCauley, M. (1985).Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto: CPP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, I., & Makin, P. (1986). Management selection in Britain: A survey and critique.Journal of Occupational Psychology, 59, 45–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velicer, W., & Weiner, B. (1975). Effects of sophistication and faking sets on the Eysenck Personality Inventory.Psychological Reports, 37, 71–73.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Furnham, A. Faking personality questionnaires: Fabricating different profiles for different purposes. Current Psychology 9, 46–55 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686767

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686767

Keywords

Navigation