Skip to main content

A Binary System Close to Home: How the Moon and Earth Orbit Each Other

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Newton's Gravity

Part of the book series: Undergraduate Lecture Notes in Physics ((ULNP))

Abstract

The everyday notion of the planets revolving around the Sun, and the Moon revolving about the Earth – the concept of one large, fixed, and static body in the center and the satellite bodies revolving around it – is actually somewhat misleading. It depends upon one’s frame of reference. Surely if we could stand on the Sun, that would be our impression as to the planets, even though we know that all of them, and Saturn and Jupiter especially, exert their own smaller gravitational pull on the Sun and cause it to wiggle around a little irregular orbit of its own. And from our fixed reference here on Earth, the Moon naturally appears to revolve around it. Yet it too pulls on the Earth, and they both in fact orbit, albeit in vastly different arcs. Relative motion is an idea that took mankind a long time to understand and appreciate. Did it not seem natural for the Sun to be orbiting the Earth, when clearly the Sun’s motion was all that was detectable? Kepler wrestled with relative motion in trying to determine the motion of Mars from the Sun’s and not the Earth’s frame of reference. In fact all motions appear relative to the observer’s frame of reference. If one observes a system of two or more orbiting bodies from any frame of reference external to them, their orbits dance around a common center of mass. This point is usually called the barycenter of the system. The velocities of the masses in such a system depend upon the frame of reference from which they are measured. The velocity of one mass from the perspective of the center of mass will be quite different from the velocity measured from the other as the point of reference. Think about when you were on a train and another train on a parallel track inched by you in the same direction, or flew by in the opposite direction. You saw the other train’s velocity relative to you. In fact, the actual velocity of the other train, from the perspective of an observer external to both, was neither inching nor flying.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Einstein famously followed up on the implications of the idea of relative motion, beginning in 1905 with the notion of the absolute standard of the speed of light, ultimately developing theories which profoundly altered our conceptions of the fundamental nature of mass, energy, space, time and gravitation.

  2. 2.

    Recall that we often use g to represent the gravitational acceleration at various distances from the mass in question. Here we return to the f notation for the gravitational acceleration. The Earth’s gravitational acceleration imparted to the Moon at the lunar distance (caused by the gravitational pull of the Earth) is here denoted by f 2 . This is the same as the Earth’s g at lunar distance. The gravitational acceleration imparted to the Earth (from the Moon’s pull of gravity) is denoted by f 1 . This is the same as the Moon’s g at Earth distance.

  3. 3.

    For the illustrative purposes of the problem, we will not use Kepler’s Third Law to find the period, but rather use the two-step process of first finding the individual gravitational accelerations of the Earth and Moon, then finding the period.

  4. 4.

    Be careful of notation. The terms f 1 and f 2 are here the accelerations of m 1 and m 2 . They are not here the forces induced by the masses m 1 and m 2 .

  5. 5.

    See generally, http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/.

  6. 6.

    The data on the Pluto–Charon system for these problems is taken from Buie et al. [1].

Reference

  1. Buie MW, Grundy WM, Young EF, Young LA, Stern AS (2006) Orbits and photometry of Pluto’s satellites: Charon, S/2005 P1, and S/2005 P2. Astronom J 132:290–298, http://iopscience.iop.org/1538-3881/132/1/290/pdf/205133.web.pdf

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

MacDougal, D.W. (2012). A Binary System Close to Home: How the Moon and Earth Orbit Each Other. In: Newton's Gravity. Undergraduate Lecture Notes in Physics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5444-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5444-1_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5443-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5444-1

  • eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics