After the clearing of smoke and a blaze of coverage today, it looks like the decision by the Internet Watch Foundation to ban a Wikipedia page – and therefore eventually block UK users from editing the site - is turning into a real mess.
Reports have started coming in that BT has now joined Virgin, Be and others in banning the page – though quite why they didn't automagically join the ban straight away isn't obvious (perhaps Wikipedia's usually on BT's exception list?)
When I spoke to the IWF earlier, they said that this sort of decision was taken on a regular basis – but was rarely as controversial. The current review of the initial decision to ban the Virgin Killer image should be made by noon on Tuesday, I was told.
But how was the decision made? Did something go wrong here?
I asked Richard Clayton - one of the country's leading internet security experts, and someone whose work we've featured many times – what was up.
"We see this borderline stuff all the time; it's a no-win," he said. The decision seems to have been based on taking the image out of context, something which might seem pretty strange - particularly "given that you can go into HMV and buy a copy on the high street".
The main outcome – apart from highlighting the way the British internet is censored – might be to highlight the lack of cooperation between British authorities and other international bodies, he said.
After all, the FBI had already investigated – and decided not to act upon - the image's use on Wikipedia, "but because the IWF doesn't talk to people outside of the UK they weren't able to appreciate what was going on."
Comments (…)
Sign in or create your Guardian account to join the discussion