詳細検索結果
以下の条件での結果を表示する: 検索条件を変更
クエリ検索: "阿羅漢"
1,041件中 1-20の結果を表示しています
  • ――有部と上座部の教理を中心に――
    清水 俊史
    印度學佛教學研究
    2013年 61 巻 3 号 1158-1162
    発行日: 2013/03/25
    公開日: 2017/09/01
    ジャーナル フリー
    本稿は,有部と上座部との資料を検討し,
    阿羅漢
    の造業の問題について考察した.
    阿羅漢
    は,すべての煩悩を断っているのであるから悪心を起こさず,人殺しや盗みをして悪業をつくることはない.しかし,
    阿羅漢
    は善業をなすことがあるのだろうか.仮にもし,「人助け」や「社会貢献」を
    阿羅漢
    がなした場合,これらの行いは仏道修行とは無関係の世俗的な善業(すなわち福徳)であるから,輪廻しない
    阿羅漢
    にも来世の生存を生みだすという問題に陥ってしまう.このような「もはや輪廻しないはずの
    阿羅漢
    であっても,新たに業を積むのか」という問題が,有部および上座部の資料に現れている.この問題に対し両部派は,次のように全く異なる見解を示している.上座部は,
    阿羅漢
    になった者はもはや業をさらにつくることはないと解釈している.しかしこれは,仏道修行とは無関係の世俗的に「よい」とされる行為を,
    阿羅漢
    が全くなさないという意味ではない.そのような場合,
    阿羅漢
    には善心ではなく,
    阿羅漢
    のみに起こる唯作(kiriya)という特殊な無記心が起きており,その心がそのような世俗的な行為を成立させていると解釈する.一方の有部は,
    阿羅漢
    となった者も業をつくることがあると解釈している.すなわち,仏道修行とは無関係の世俗的に「よい」とされる行為をなす場合,
    阿羅漢
    にも三界繋有漏心が起こり,それらは善業になる.しかしこの
    阿羅漢
    の善業は,
    阿羅漢
    の最後生で異熟を受ければ済むもので,来世を導く能力はないものにしかならないと解釈されている.阿毘達磨の法相は一見無味乾燥としているが,このような具体的な問題にも回答しうるよう厳密に定義されていることがわかる.
  • 小川 宏
    智山学報
    1994年 43 巻 81-106
    発行日: 1994/03/31
    公開日: 2017/08/31
    ジャーナル フリー
    倶舎論賢聖品に所出の喬底迦比丘の
    阿羅漢
    果よりの退失をめぐる「退法
    阿羅漢
    」伝説を中心として、その伝説の淵源を探り、更に、聖果よりの退転・不退転の如何を部派仏教の各派がどの様に考えていたかを探求する。特に喬底迦の残した長老偈中の偈頌を考察し、その「雨中庵住」の境地の評価が
    阿羅漢
    果退転論に大きな位置を占める事を明らかにする事を企図する。
  • 大岩 碩
    パーリ学仏教文化学
    1995年 8 巻 1-26
    発行日: 1995/05/27
    公開日: 2018/09/01
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 勝本 華蓮
    パーリ学仏教文化学
    1998年 11 巻 17-29
    発行日: 1998/05/20
    公開日: 2018/09/01
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 龍口 明生
    宗教研究
    2012年 85 巻 4 号 1164-1165
    発行日: 2012/03/30
    公開日: 2017/07/14
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 佐々木 大悟
    宗教研究
    2004年 77 巻 4 号 1039-1040
    発行日: 2004/03/30
    公開日: 2017/07/14
    ジャーナル フリー
  • パーリ聖典の範囲で
    藤本 晃
    パーリ学仏教文化学
    2021年 34 巻 29-59
    発行日: 2021年
    公開日: 2022/08/27
    ジャーナル フリー
  • コンカーラッタナラック プラポンサック
    パーリ学仏教文化学
    2012年 26 巻 1-13
    発行日: 2012/12/22
    公開日: 2018/09/01
    ジャーナル フリー
    It is the highest purpose in Buddhism to detach all pains (dukkha), attain the nirvana (nibbana), and become an arhat (arahant). However, among the arhats who have achieved spiritual enlightenment, various kinds of arthats exist. In SN.8.7 Pavarana (SN.I.191), the Buddha explained four kinds of arhats that tevijja, chalabhinna, ubhatobhagavimutta, pannnavimutta. In this text, tevijja and chalabhinna are explained as an arhat who is "a possessor of the threefold clear vision" and "a possessor of the six branches of higher knowledge," respectively. However, the explanation about ubhatobhagavimutta and pannavimutta is not clear in this text. On the other hand, both kinds of arhat are variously explained in other places. How then should we understand these two terms? At first glance, ubhatobhagavimutta is those who have attained cetovimutti and pannavimutti, and pannavimutta is those who have attained only pannavimutti. In addition, according to AN.2.3 Bala-vagga 10 (AN.I.61) in connection with cetovimutti and pannavimutti, one would leave raga and attain cetovimutti by practicing samatha. On the other hand, one would leave avijja and attain pannavimutti by practicing vipassana. According to the above viewpoint, ubhatobhagavimutta will mean those who practice samatha and vipassana for the attainment of cetovimutti and pannavimutti. And pannavimutta is those who practice only vipassana just for the attainment of pannavimutti. In other word, it could be understood here that ubhatobhagavimutta requires jhana or aruppa, whereas pannavimutta requires neither jhana nor aruppa. However, is that right? If it was right, why has the example of pannavimutti mentioned independently not yet found in the early Pali Canon (Nikaya) despite of a plenty of examples that cetovimutti and pannavimutti are mentioned together? In order to understand this problem, especially the relation between pannavimutta and jhana from the early Pali Canon's point of view, I have studied the previous works focused on the early Pali Canon and have reached to the following conclusions. 1. At first glance, ubhatobhagavimutta is those who have attained cetovimutti and pannavimutti, and pannavimutta is those who have attained only pannavimutti. The former is so, but the latter is not. Unlike its term, pannavimutta has attained not only pannavimutti but cetovimutti as well. This is why, in early Pali Canon, we have not found the example of pannavimutti mentioned independently despite of a plenty of examples that cetovimutti and pannavimutti are mentioned together. 2. Ubhatobhagavimutta is explained that they experience santa vimokha and attha vimokha. Santa vimokha and attha vimokha are the spiritual stage of aruppa which is beyond jhana. On the other hand, although pannavimutta has no experience of either santa vimokha or attha vimokha, they also attain cetovimutti, not only pannavimutti. This clarifies that samatha was needed by pannavimutta. However, samatha mentioned here is only a stage of jhana for the attainment of cetovimutti, not yet attaining the stage of aruppa. In short, pannavimutta needs jhana.
  • 藤本 晃
    パーリ学仏教文化学
    2005年 19 巻 53-63
    発行日: 2005/12/20
    公開日: 2018/09/01
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 田辺 和子
    パーリ学仏教文化学
    2013年 27 巻 89-109
    発行日: 2013/12/22
    公開日: 2018/09/01
    ジャーナル フリー
    The Text Bra Mahabuddhaguna is written in the Thai Folding Book made in 18th century. Mahabuddhaguna means the great virtues of the Buddha. The Text is beginning with iti pi so, in which ten virtues of the Buddha namely arahant, sammasambuddho, vijjacaranasampanno, sugato, lokavidu, anuttaro, purisadammasarathi, sattha devamanussanam, buddho, bhagava are explained in detail. Further as the lokavidu is divided into the three sorts: sankharalokavidu, sattalokavidu and bhajanalokavidu, we can find here explanations of the twelve virtues of the Buddha. After the explanation of each virtue the nama-kara-verse is written. The last is the homage verse to the whole virtues of the Buddha. These verses are called gatha Bra Buddhaguna as these are known in other palm leaf manuscripts and other folding books. It is indicated in this paper that the explanations on the virtues of the Buddha in the Text Bra Mahabuddhaguna are closely related to ones in the Buddhemussati in the Visuddhimagga. It is thought that the author of this Text would have used the Visuddhimagga, when he composed this Text.
  • 南部 千代里
    宗教研究
    2012年 85 巻 4 号 1162-1164
    発行日: 2012/03/30
    公開日: 2017/07/14
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 馬場 紀寿
    宗教研究
    2004年 77 巻 4 号 1038-1039
    発行日: 2004/03/30
    公開日: 2017/07/14
    ジャーナル フリー
  • -菩薩思想の社会学的考察-
    久保田 正文
    社会学評論
    1955年 5 巻 4 号 2-9
    発行日: 1955/04/15
    公開日: 2009/11/11
    ジャーナル フリー
    (1) Buddhism is a religion founded about five or six centuries before the Christian era by Gautama, the Buddha, who was born in Central India.
    According to H. G. Wells' Outline of History published in 1920, it is about a half century since the life and teachings of the Buddha was clarified. His teachings are simple and plain easily understood even by the modern.
    (2) During the few centuries following the death of the Buddha, however, the Buddhist order lost its elasticity assuming a state of ossification. It lost sight of the real raison d'etre and came to hold its maintenance and prosperity as its highest aim.
    The ossification was due to the fact that the four factors which formed the Buddhist order-priests and lay believers of both sexes-lacked harmonious co-operation for the furtherance of their common end. In the days of the Buddha, there was teamwork among these four factors and they together strove for the realization of the supreme objective of Buddhism-the attainment of Buddhahood. In later times the priests, having been held in great reverence by lay believers, came to consider themselves as superior beings, and in order to sustain their respect and also to show a strong front to other religions then in existence, built up a sort of philosophy of great complicity. Such philosophy was foreign to Buddhism in its original form. It aimed at the salvation of one's own self through the renouncement of the world.
    (3) To relieve the situation, there arose the so-called Mahayana Buddhism. It rejected the sense of superiority and the self-complacency of the priests and insisted that those who had grasped the essence of the faith, be they laymen, were more in accord with the will of the Buddha than the priests who adhered to the fixed formalities. Thus it was that the idea of Buddhisattiva, the prominent feature of Mahayana Buddhism, was born.
    (4) As its characteristic, the idea of Boddhisattiva treats man as a social being. In this connection the Sutra of the Lotus, one of the scriptures of Mahayana Buddhism, says, “Not stained by the ways of the world like the lotus in water.” In this context both “the world” and “water” signify society. Man, being a social being, so teaches the idea of Boddhisattiva, he could not achieve his own salvation independent of society. Here strong emphasis is laid on the ethics of creative altruism. May this not be interpreted as a discovery of “society” in Buddhist thought ?
  • 石井 清純
    日本佛敎學會年報
    2013年 78 巻 53-74
    発行日: 2013年
    公開日: 2023/10/09
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 韓 尚希
    パーリ学仏教文化学
    2014年 28 巻 21-45
    発行日: 2014/12/22
    公開日: 2018/09/01
    ジャーナル フリー
    Researches up to date with regard to the function of the confidence (saddha) and wisdom (panna) in the practice of early Buddhism had strong tendency to understand that these two factors, saddha and panna, work ultimately for different purposes in achieving the fruit of Stream-entry (sotapattiphala). The aim of this paper, however, is to reveal, on the contrary, that both saddha and panna are both in need for achieving the fruit of Stream-entry (sotapattiphala), and that they should not be regarded as functioning separately, despite these two factors are in fact being mentioned alternately in Pali materials. Abandoning fetter (samyojana) is the most fundamental standard of classification of the four Noble Ones from arahat to sotapanna (Stream-enterer). Sotapanna is free from the first three samyojanas which are personality-belief (sakkayaditthi), skeptical doubt (vicikiccha), and clinging to rules and ritual (silabbataparamasa). Since sotapanna means that he has abandoned three samyojanas, the method for achieving sotapattiphala is identical with the method of abandoning samyojana. Sakkayaditthi and silabbataparamasa of these three samyojanas are abandoned by panna of No-self (anatta), attained as a consequence of impermanence (anicca) that is the eye for the truth (dhammacakkhu). Since sakkayaditthi which is the view identifying oneself with five aggregates (pancakkhandha), and silabbataparamasa which arises from eternalism (sassataditthi) are result from the wrong view about oneself, they are abandoned by panna of anicca, suffering (dukkha), anatta, which is sotapanna's, panna. The rest vicikiccha occurs in the condition of not having confidence, and it can be abandoned by saddha based on panna, which is sotapanna's saddha. In this way, three samyojanas are abandoned by both saddha and panna belonging to sotapanna. This fact that both saddha and panna are necessary to achieve sotapattiphala is confirmed by descriptions of Buddhist Saints in the literatures. It may well be understood that saddhanusarin and dhammanusarin who belong to sotapattimagga, and saddhavimutta and ditthippatta who belong to sotapattiphala have two separate methods, saddha or panna, in achieving magga and phala, but actually they have equal method. They are just classified according to superior faculty (indriya), endowed with both saddha and panna, and they achieve sotapattiphala by these two elements.
  • 第一人者の伝承に基づく訳語の検討
    古川 洋平
    パーリ学仏教文化学
    2019年 33 巻 21-38
    発行日: 2019年
    公開日: 2020/08/14
    ジャーナル オープンアクセス
    本論において,筆者は上座部仏教の中におけるŚ とA の定義,修道論中のŚ,saddhādhimutta 第一とされるヴァッカリとシガーラカの母の伝承の3点を通してsaddhādhimutta の訳語の考察を行う。 パーリ聖典において,仏に対するŚ は修道の起点に位置しており,仏の教えを信じ(Ś を抱き),Ś を教えの理解によって強化することが求められる。ヴァッカリとシガーラカの母の伝承の中で,彼等のŚ はŚ に続く修行を実践するには強力過ぎたとされている。また,後者の伝承では,adhiniviṭṭha(入れ込んだ)がA の言い換えとして使用される。これは他のものに目を向けないというA の特徴をよく表している。 以上の検討から筆者は,村上・及川氏が提示するように,saddhādhimutta を「Ś に志向している者」「Ś に傾倒している者」と理解する。
  • 智谷 公和
    宗教研究
    2007年 80 巻 4 号 1108-1109
    発行日: 2007/03/30
    公開日: 2017/07/14
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 藤井 淳
    宗教研究
    2004年 77 巻 4 号 1040-1041
    発行日: 2004/03/30
    公開日: 2017/07/14
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 三友 健容
    宗教研究
    2007年 80 巻 4 号 1109-1110
    発行日: 2007/03/30
    公開日: 2017/07/14
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 龍口 明生
    宗教研究
    2006年 79 巻 4 号 1189-1190
    発行日: 2006/03/30
    公開日: 2017/07/14
    ジャーナル フリー
feedback
Top