The world's leading museums have for the first time united to issue a declaration. Their statement on "the importance and value of universal museums" follows increasing concern about the politicization of Greek claims against the British Museum over the Parthenon Marbles.
Although the declaration released in December does not specifically mention the marbles, it points out that the acquisition of classical antiquities from Greece by European and North American museums "marked the significance of Greek sculpture for mankind as a whole and its enduring value for the contemporary world."
The thrust of the international declaration is that "objects acquired in earlier times must be viewed in the light of different sensitivities and values reflective of that earlier era." It points out that demands to repatriate objects which have belonged to museum collections for many years have now become an important issue for museums. "Although each case has to be judged individually, we should acknowledge that museums serve not just the citizens of one nation but the people of every nation."
The statement followed the meeting in Munich last October of what is known as the International Group of Organizers of Large-scale Exhibitions.
Despite its uninspiring title, this is a powerful forum which comprises the directors of the world's 40 or so leading museums and galleries, who meet annually to discuss common concerns. Insiders refer to it as the Bizot Group, after
The universal museums declaration has been signed by directors of more than 30 of the world's major institutions, including the big five--the Metropolitan (Philippe de Montebello), the Louvre (Henri Loyrette), the Hermitage (Mikhail Piotrovski), the State museums of Berlin (Peter-Klaus Schuster) and the British Museum (Neil MacGregor). A dozen Bizot members had not yet formally signed when we went to press, but most are expected to do so, and the declaration does represent the views of the international group.
Other directors wanted to support the British Museum, but felt that it would be more positive to articulate the ideals of the universal museum, which is threatened by wider calls for repatriation. "So far the public debate has been conducted very much in terms of the value of restitution, but there has been much less debate about the importance of the context which a great museum offers," Mr. MacGregor explained.
Rijksmuseum director Professor
Professor de Leeuw stressed that the declaration did not apply to more recent acquisitions. "Of course, we would not now dream of buying illegally exported antiquities or ethnographic objects, or of not returning a painting to a rightful Jewish owner."
Professor de Leeuw said another reason for concern was that there had been a few recent cases of objects being returned, and questions had been asked at Munich as to whether this "had been premature, or perhaps done for emotional or political reasons." He was unwilling to cite examples, but last month Italy returned a fragment of the Parthenon frieze--part of the figure of Peitho, from the archaeological museum in Palermo--to Greece on long-term loan.
As well as the British Museum, a number of other major institutions are facing restitution demands. Two Parthenon sculptures are being claimed from the Louvre. The Pergamon Altar, the highlight of the Pergamon Museum in Berlin, has been claimed by Turkey. Nigeria has called for the return of Benin bronzes from dozens of museums. Egypt has made claims for major antiquities. U.S. museums have faced calls for the return of pre-Columbian antiquities from Latin America.
The Bizot Group's declaration on universal museums is an attempt to shift the focus of the debate over restitution, but inevitably it will spark considerable controversy and debate, particularly from countries that feel they have legitimate claims.
| © 2002 The Art Newspaper |