GAMES: GameSpot | GameFAQs MUSIC: Last.fm | MP3.com MOVIES: Metacritic | Movietome TV: TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games TV

DVD and Video

Upcoming Release Calendar
Awards & Bests By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

 



 

Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
Warner Bros.

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 81 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
6.6 out of 10
based on 40 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
based on 348 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

MPAA RATING: PG for frightening moments, creature violence and mild language

Starring Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint, Gary Oldman, David Thewlis, Robbie Coltrane, Emma Thompson, and Julie Christie

In this third installment of the series, the infamous Sirius Black has escaped from the dreaded fortress of Azkaban and is headed straight to Harry Potter.


GENRE(S): Adventure  |  Family/Kids  |  Fantasy  
WRITTEN BY: Steven Kloves
J.K. Rowling (novel)
 
DIRECTED BY: Alfonso Cuarón  
RELEASE DATE: DVD: November 23, 2004 
Video: November 23, 2004 
Theatrical: June 4, 2004 
RUNNING TIME: 136 minutes, Color 
ORIGIN: USA 

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

100
San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle
A different kind of Harry Potter movie, a better kind... It's where this fantasy series has wanted to go all along.
Read Full Review
100
Baltimore Sun Michael Sragow
The Prisoner of Azkaban is to Harry Potter what that other No. 3, "Goldfinger," was to James Bond: the movie that takes the invention and gamesmanship of the series to a whole new giddy peak.
Read Full Review
100
Premiere Susannah Gora
Soars gloriously into fluency and magic.
Read Full Review
100
Salon.com Stephanie Zacharek
One of the greatest fantasy films of all time.
Read Full Review
100
New York Magazine Peter Rainer
The most powerfully entrancing children's film in years. Of course, a true kid's classic is just as magical for adults.
Read Full Review
91
Seattle Post-Intelligencer William Arnold
Potter 3 is, in its heart of hearts, a teenage angst movie...Cuaron has done a masterful job of bringing off this shift in the Potter paradigm without disrupting any disruption in the established style of the series and without any pandering concessions to the teen-movie genre.
Read Full Review
90
Chicago Reader J.R. Jones
Like the first two movies, this is loaded with computer-generated imagery, but for the first time there's a sense of dramatic proportion balancing the spectacle and the story line.
Read Full Review
90
Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern
The right word for Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban is wondersful -- as in full of wonders, great and small.
90
The Hollywood Reporter Michael Rechtshaffen
A deeper, darker, visually arresting and more emotionally satisfying adaptation of the J.K. Rowling literary phenomenon, achieving the neat trick of remaining faithful to the spirit of the book while at the same time being true to its cinematic self.
Read Full Review
90
LA Weekly Ella Taylor
The best of the Harry Potter films so far, Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban is also hands down the scariest, and the deepest.
Read Full Review
88
Chicago Tribune Mark Caro
With Cuaron leading the way, Harry has burst from the printed page to soar on-screen.
Read Full Review
88
Rolling Stone Peter Travers
Not only is this dazzler by far the best and most thrilling of the three Harry Potter movies to date, it's a film that can stand on its own even if you never heard of author J.K. Rowling and her young wizard hero.
Read Full Review
88
New York Daily News Jami Bernard
An entrancing experience for Potter fans. It's a carefully crafted, dreamy immersion in a world that feels snugly familiar even when evil intrudes.
Read Full Review
88
Charlotte Observer Lawrence Toppman
In an era when most scripts are written by committees of monkeys, hearing one man's intelligent voice is an almost forgotten pleasure.
Read Full Review
88
Boston Globe Wesley Morris
[Cuaron]'s a visionary and crafty storyteller who rewards your patience, not with twists in the plot, though the movie has its share, but with pure feeling. Deploying wit, grace, and artistry, he's whisked a kid flick into adolescence.
Read Full Review
88
Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
Is Prisoner of Azkaban as good as the first two films? Not quite. It doesn't have that sense of joyously leaping through a clockwork plot, and it needs to explain more than it should. But the world of Harry Potter remains delightful, amusing and sophisticated.
Read Full Review
88
USA Today Claudia Puig
Who would think Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban could be an art film? Thanks to director Alfonso Cuaron, a dazzling storyteller with a keen eye for whimsical detail, the third film in the Potter franchise is a visual delight.
Read Full Review
88
New York Post Lou Lumenick
This movie belongs to its young stars, who have grown immensely as actors since they were first ideally cast by Chris Columbus, the hack who directed the first two movies.
Read Full Review
83
Portland Oregonian Karen Karbo
Much has been made about the fact that the world's most popular fictional children are growing up and straight into that horror-filled no man's land of the human life span, puberty.
Read Full Review
83
Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman
Shot in spooky gradations of silver and shadow, The Prisoner of Azkaban is the first movie in the series with fear and wonder in its bones, and genuine fun, too.
Read Full Review
80
Dallas Observer Luke Y. Thompson
In the Harry Potter film series thus far, The Sorcerer's Stone remains the strongest, perhaps because the first look at any rich new world is almost always going to be more groundbreaking than its sequels. But Prisoner of Azkaban is a worthy and stylistically different follow-up, where Chamber of Secrets often felt like an unimaginative retread.
Read Full Review
80
Slate David Edelstein
In Cuarón's hands, the world of Harry Potter doesn't feel like a synthetic movie theme park anymore. It's almost real, Hogwarts and all.
Read Full Review
80
Los Angeles Times Kenneth Turan
Azkaban breaks free of all these shackles in its final hour. Working with the persuasive Thewlis and Oldman, able to focus his gifts on what's distinctive, dramatic and surprising about the story, Cuarón creates on screen the heartfelt magic that has enthralled so many on the page.
Read Full Review
80
The New York Times Dana Stevens
This film may disappoint some dogmatic Old Hogwartsians: a few plot points have been sacrificed, and Mr. Cuarón does not seem to care much for Quidditch. But it more than compensates for these lapses with its emotional force and visual panache.
Read Full Review
80
Newsweek Sean Smith
The result is a film that's really moving--and really moves.
Read Full Review
80
Time Richard Corliss
Enjoy the savory witches' brew that Cuaron has cooked up in his Harry pot. For on its own terms, this one is truly wizard.
Read Full Review
78
Austin Chronicle Marrit Ingman
It helps that J.K. Rowling’s third book in the series is full of spooky stuff that translates beautifully to screen.
Read Full Review
75
Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt
From its restlessly moving camera work to its heartfelt acting by a splendid cast, "Azkaban" is a horror movie for mature kids.
Read Full Review
75
ReelViews James Berardinelli
Although Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban stands well enough on its own, it has a "middle chapter" feeling. In other words, there's no real beginning or ending. Little is resolved and the film's climax is low-key.
Read Full Review
75
Philadelphia Inquirer Steven Rea
In the end, Harry Potter and The Prisoner of Azkaban offers what neither of its predecessors, for all their wand-waving and witch-brooms, had: real magic.
Read Full Review
75
Miami Herald Rene Rodriguez
Here, finally, is a Harry Potter picture that lives up to its potential -- that, plainly, LIVES.
Read Full Review
70
Washington Post Nicole Arthur
It's not perfect, or even close, but it delivers on the promise of J.K. Rowling's novels to a far greater extent.
Read Full Review
70
Variety Brian Lowry
Visually dazzling and considerably darker than the prior incarnations, the story suffers from a slightly disjointed feel that will prove less accessible to those not intimately familiar with every corner of author J.K. Rowling's world.
Read Full Review
70
Village Voice Michael Atkinson
A mild upkick in pacing and texture can be credited to director Alfonso Cuarón (more Little Princess than Y Tu Mamá), who avoids Chris Columbus's mastodon-like setups and knows a bit more about whipping up atmospherics.
Read Full Review
70
The Onion (A.V. Club) Scott Tobias
With shades of Carrie, Harry's magical powers and adolescent angst make a combustible fusion, taking on frightening, vengeful implications that Cuarón honors by refusing to airbrush the shadowy regions of fantasy.
Read Full Review
63
The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Rick Groen
From my doddering perspective - rheumy with a view - Volume 3 puts plenty of cinema into the picture but leeches all the charm out of the tale.
Read Full Review
60
TV Guide Maitland McDonagh
Cuaron lets his enthusiasms show.
Read Full Review
60
Empire Colin Kennedy
Azkaban contains both the longest denouement and the most rousing finish of any of the books, and Cuarón wisely whips through the 'ah-hahs' so that the clever climax, complete with the series' best SFX, can enjoy its moment in the moonlight.
Read Full Review
50
Film Threat Rick Kisonak
If my moviegoing experience was magical in any way, it was only in that I once or twice nodded off for a spell.
Read Full Review
40
Washington Post Ann Hornaday
Put delicately, this is one long sit, made all the more so by a turgid story, a dour visual palette and uninspiring action.
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this movie is 6.6 (out of 10) based on 348 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

[Anonymous] gave it a7:
The weakest of the films. I don't know why, it just doesn't give me the same feeling as I did with the first two. Don't get me wrong, this is a fun movie, good, but not great.

Jon L gave it an8:
Too episodic to be great, but visually sumptuous and with an actual director at helm, shows the world with far more creativity and authenticity, rather than a visualization of the novels, which aren't much good in the first place.

Rita S. gave it a0:
Seriously, it needs to be redone. Professional reviewers, most of whom have no idea what the book is about, give it a good review because of what? The special effects? The "dark"ness? Did they read the book? Did the !@^%$#!&! director even read the book!?!?! Or did someone just give him a 2 minute summary of it and he made the movie out of what he could remember from it? How did JKR agree to this? Did she even? I can only imagine her feelings of horror as she watched her book getting murdered. It seems these questions will go unanswered. Feels like scenes were mixed up and a lot of stuff has been horribly changed and a lot has been left out. Good thing the director didn't stick around for the fourth part. Good riddance.

Jonathan F. gave it a9:
Fantastic, very close to the best in the series.

Tom K. gave it an8:
Cuaron did genius work ignoring the previous of Chris Columbus. The third film in series is matching the film in style, it's darker and deeper. The work that Elfonso Cuaron did changed the Harry Potter film forever, for good.

Ruan H gave it a9:
The most engaging and entertaining film of the series to date. This is Harry Potter, darker and more serious than before. Good adaptation from the book.

[Anonymous] gave it a5:
They take out so much of the movie and the scenes weren't even in the same order as the chapters were in the book, Harry gets the Firebolt in the middle of the book, not in the end, and Harry never even got a chance to fight the Bogart in the book.

Read more user comments...

Discuss this movie in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

Popular on CBS sites: iPhone 3G | Fantasy Football | Moneywatch | Antivirus Software | Recipes | E3 2009

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use