Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

For $DEITY's sake...

1 view
Skip to first unread message

James Farrar

unread,
Dec 3, 2006, 2:02:17 PM12/3/06
to
Hit the guy!

Sheesh.

JohnBoy

unread,
Dec 3, 2006, 2:04:21 PM12/3/06
to
On Sun, 03 Dec 2006 19:02:17 +0000, James Farrar
<james.s...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Hit the guy!
>
>Sheesh.

Missed tackles and bad tackling!

James Farrar

unread,
Dec 3, 2006, 2:37:23 PM12/3/06
to
On Sun, 03 Dec 2006 09:04:21 -1000, JohnBoy <Jo...@clearwire.net>
wrote:

And precious little pressure on the QB. And two timeouts lost due to
insufficient substitution preparation. This looks like it's gonna be a
loooooooooong day.

James Farrar

unread,
Dec 3, 2006, 2:39:34 PM12/3/06
to
On Sun, 03 Dec 2006 19:37:23 +0000, James Farrar
<james.s...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 03 Dec 2006 09:04:21 -1000, JohnBoy <Jo...@clearwire.net>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 03 Dec 2006 19:02:17 +0000, James Farrar
>><james.s...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Hit the guy!
>>>
>>>Sheesh.
>>
>>Missed tackles and bad tackling!
>
>And precious little pressure on the QB.

And then, when a guy does get to the QB, gets his arms on him, can't
bring him down. This is goign to be a seriously depressing 2nd half
unless Nolan gives them a rocket at half time.

JohnBoy

unread,
Dec 12, 2006, 10:41:14 PM12/12/06
to
On Sun, 03 Dec 2006 19:37:23 +0000, James Farrar
<james.s...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 03 Dec 2006 09:04:21 -1000, JohnBoy <Jo...@clearwire.net>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 03 Dec 2006 19:02:17 +0000, James Farrar
>><james.s...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Hit the guy!
>>>
>>>Sheesh.
>>
>>Missed tackles and bad tackling!
>
>And precious little pressure on the QB. And two timeouts lost due to
>insufficient substitution preparation. This looks like it's gonna be a
>loooooooooong day.

Same story against Favre on Sunday, James. He had enough time to
build a house back there.

James Farrar

unread,
Dec 12, 2006, 10:54:20 PM12/12/06
to
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:41:14 -1000, JohnBoy <Jo...@clearwire.net>
wrote:

>On Sun, 03 Dec 2006 19:37:23 +0000, James Farrar
><james.s...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 03 Dec 2006 09:04:21 -1000, JohnBoy <Jo...@clearwire.net>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 03 Dec 2006 19:02:17 +0000, James Farrar
>>><james.s...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hit the guy!
>>>>
>>>>Sheesh.
>>>
>>>Missed tackles and bad tackling!
>>
>>And precious little pressure on the QB. And two timeouts lost due to
>>insufficient substitution preparation. This looks like it's gonna be a
>>loooooooooong day.
>
>Same story against Favre on Sunday, James. He had enough time to
>build a house back there.

Yeah, I know. I watched it :(

For the record, having watched three straight defeats, I am unable to
watch Thursday night's game, as I shall be at work.

I think if the 49ers win, I'm radio only for the last two weeks.

James Farrar

unread,
Dec 15, 2006, 12:10:07 AM12/15/06
to
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 03:54:20 +0000, James Farrar
<james.s...@gmail.com> wrote:

>For the record, having watched three straight defeats, I am unable to
>watch Thursday night's game, as I shall be at work.

I didn't even listen to it, due to a fool of a colleague wanting to
listen to the cricket :(

>I think if the 49ers win, I'm radio only for the last two weeks.

Looks that way. :)

If you'd have told me before the season that the 49ers would still be
in contention with two weeks to go, I would have laughed in your face.
Shows what I know :)

0 new messages