Research article
Vipp1 is required for basic thylakoid membrane formation but not for the assembly of thylakoid protein complexes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2007.01.005Get rights and content

Abstract

Vipp1 (vesicle inducing protein in plastids 1) is found in cyanobacteria and chloroplasts where it is essential for thylakoid formation. Arabidopsis thaliana mutant plants with a reduction of Vipp1 to about 20% of wild type content become albinotic at an early stage. We propose that this drastic phenotype results from an inability of the remaining Vipp1 protein to assemble into a homo-oligomeric complex, indicating that oligomerization is a prerequisite for Vipp1 function. A Vipp1–ProteinA fusion protein, expressed in the Δvipp1 mutant background, is able to reinstate oligomerization and restore photoautotrophic growth. Plants containing Vipp1–ProteinA in amounts comparable to Vipp1 in the wild type exhibit a wild type phenotype. However, plants with a reduced amount of Vipp1–ProteinA protein are growth-retarded and significantly paler than the wild type. This phenotype is caused by a decrease in thylakoid membrane content and a concomitant reduction in photosynthetic activity. To the extent that thylakoid membranes are made in these plants they are properly assembled with protein-pigment complexes and are photosynthetically active. This strongly supports a function of Vipp1 in basic thylakoid membrane formation and not in the functional assembly of thylakoid protein complexes. Intriguingly, electron microscopic analysis shows that chloroplasts in the mutant plants are not equally affected by the Vipp1 shortage. Indeed, a wide range of different stages of thylakoid development ranging from wild-type-like chloroplasts to plastids nearly devoid of thylakoids can be observed in organelles of one and the same cell.

Introduction

Oxygenic photosynthesis is a specific feature of cyanobacteria and chloroplasts of plants and algae. Characteristic for oxygenic photosynthesis is a specialized membrane system, the thylakoids, on which the components of the photosynthetic machinery are located [20]. Despite its importance in the process of oxygenic photosynthesis, very little is known about the origin of the thylakoid membrane in the ancestor of today's cyanobacteria. Furthermore, proteins and other factors that are involved in the formation and maintenance of the thylakoid membrane in either cyanobacteria or chloroplasts are not well defined.

We have shown recently that in Arabidopsis as well as in Synechocystis the vesicle inducing protein in plastids 1 (Vipp1) is essential for thylakoid biogenesis [3], [11], [21]. Δvipp1 mutant plants, in which the expression of the vipp1 gene is greatly reduced, have lost their ability to build up a proper thylakoid membrane system and consequently to perform oxygenic photosynthesis. Disruption of the vipp1 gene in Arabidopsis also abolished chloroplast vesicle transport, which has an alleged function in thylakoid formation in the chloroplasts of higher plants [22], [23]. Vipp1 apparently derived from a bacterial ancestor, the phage shock protein A (PspA), which is expressed in many bacteria under distinct stress conditions that affect the integrity of the plasma membrane [4], [5], [7], [9]. PspA and Vipp1 are both able to form homo-multimeric high-molecular-weight complexes but the significance of oligomerization for the function of these proteins is not clear [3], [8]. The C-terminal domain that distinguishes all Vipp1 proteins from PspA is not involved in oligomerization [3] and is therefore likely to have a specific function in thylakoid biogenesis. Since Δvipp1 mutant plants exhibit a nearly complete loss of thylakoid membrane formation, they are only capable of heterotrophic growth and develop an albinotic phenotype at a very early stage [11]. This leads to a number of secondary effects that cannot be correlated directly with the function of Vipp1. Therefore the primary function of Vipp1 in thylakoid membrane formation is difficult to assess from these plants.

In this work we made use of an Arabidopsis line that expresses a fusion protein of Vipp1 and ProteinA from Staphylococcus aureus in the Δvipp1 background. The Vipp1–ProteinA fusion protein is able to reinstate autotrophic growth. Plants which are homozygous with regard to the VIPP1–PROTEINA insertion possess a Vipp1–ProteinA content similar to the Vipp1 content of wild type and accordingly re-establish the wild-type phenotype. Nevertheless, plants heterozygous for the insertion have only about half the amount of Vipp1–ProteinA and do not reach a full recovery under normal growth conditions. Thus, these plants have enabled us to more clearly determine the primary physiological effects exerted by a deficiency in Vipp1.

Section snippets

Reduction in Vipp1 content affects plants differently under different light conditions

We have shown earlier that a T-DNA insertion into the promoter region of the At1g65260 gene (VIPP1) gives rise to mutants with a limited amount of Vipp1 (about 20% of wild type content) and a disability to form thylakoid membranes [11]. Mutant plants are no longer capable of photoautotrophic growth and develop an albinotic phenotype at an early stage. This phenotype could be rescued by production of a Vipp1–ProteinA fusion protein in the Δvipp1 mutant background. Transformants were initially

Discussion

We had shown previously that a severe reduction in Vipp1 content leads to a loss of thylakoid formation as well as photosynthetic capacity both in chloroplasts and cyanobacteria [11], [21]. Nevertheless, due to its albinotic phenotype the original Δvipp1 mutant suffered from a number of secondary defects not directly connected to the loss of Vipp1. This made it difficult to discern the exact function of Vipp1 in thylakoid development. It was suggested that Vipp1 is involved in the formation of

Plant material, growth conditions, and mutant selection

For most experiments seedlings of Arabidopsis thaliana (var. Columbia Col-0) were grown at 22 °C under a 16 h light and 8 h dark cycle on MS-plates supplemented with 1% (w/v) sucrose as described before [11]. Propagation of both Δvipp1 and VIPP1–PROTEINA plants occurred via heterozygous offspring. All comparisons between mutant and wild type plants were carried out with leaf material of the same developmental stage. To obtain the VIPP1–PROTEINA plants, the entire VIPP1 reading frame was

Acknowledgements

The skilful technical assistance of Ms Silvia Dobler in preparing the electron micrographs and of Ms Daniela Duy in performing real-time PCR is gratefully acknowledged. The original pea vipp1 clone was a gift from Dr K. Keegstra. This work was supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB-TR1).

References (23)

  • S.J. Clough et al.

    Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana

    Plant J.

    (1998)
  • Cited by (63)

    • The archaeal Cdv cell division system

      2023, Trends in Microbiology
    • Supramolecular organization of chloroplast membranes

      2023, The Chlamydomonas Sourcebook: Volume 2: Organellar and Metabolic Processes
    • Structural basis for VIPP1 oligomerization and maintenance of thylakoid membrane integrity

      2021, Cell
      Citation Excerpt :

      Samples were subjected to western blot analysis, and quantification of the results from three independent biological replicates was performed using the ImageQuant TL software (GE Healthcare). Generation of the antibodies used in this study has been described previously: αCurT (Heinz et al., 2016), αD1 (Schottkowski et al., 2009) and αVIPP1 (Aseeva et al., 2007). Additional antibodies were purchased from Agrisera: αPsaD, αRbcL, αRieske and αS1.

    • Bacterial Vipp1 and PspA are members of the ancient ESCRT-III membrane-remodeling superfamily

      2021, Cell
      Citation Excerpt :

      This is striking because these proteins share a common function in membrane remodeling. Thus, PspA functions in membrane stress response and repair in bacteria (Brissette et al., 1990; Joly et al., 2010; Kobayashi et al., 2007; McDonald et al., 2015; Yamaguchi et al., 2010), whereas Vipp1 functions in thylakoid membrane biogenesis and repair in cyanobacteria and chloroplasts (Aseeva et al., 2007; Fuhrmann et al., 2009b; Gao and Xu, 2009; Gutu et al., 2018; Kroll et al., 2001; Lo and Theg, 2012; Nordhues et al., 2012; Walter et al., 2015; Westphal et al., 2001; Zhang and Sakamoto, 2015). Like their ESCRT-III counterparts in eukaryotes, PspA and Vipp1 bind membranes and self-assemble as polymeric rings and tubes (Aseeva et al., 2004; Fuhrmann et al., 2009a; Liu et al., 2007).

    • Organization into higher ordered ring structures counteracts membrane binding of IM30, a protein associated with inner membranes in chloroplasts and cyanobacteria

      2016, Journal of Biological Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Several in vivo studies have shown that the protein plays an essential role in TM formation and maintenance (reviewed in Ref. 6), e.g. the depletion of the protein in Arabidopsis thaliana or the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 has resulted in a decreased amount of TMs (3, 7–9). Under cold stress conditions, depletion of IM30 resulted in the formation of vesicular structures at the chloroplast inner envelope membrane in Arabidopsis, which led to the name Vipp1 (vesicle inducing protein in plastids 1) (3).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text