Thursday, January 22, 2009

The End of the Beginning

It’s hard to say who had the line of the night, Joe Biden or Jay-Z. At the DC Armory’s Obama Staff Ball last night in Washington, Joe Biden laughingly told the assembled thousands of snazzily-dressed campaign vets, “If I’d known how good you guys were, I’d have never gone to Iowa.”

The celebration capped off a week of spectacle not witnessed before in our nation’s history. Both Obamas, both Bidens, David Plouffe, Kal Penn, Arcade Fire and Jay-Z headlined the event, meant as a reward for the men and women, mostly in their twenties, who dedicated their lives toward the common purpose of electing Barack Obama President of the United States.

Young people generally perform paid campaign work, because the hours are absurd and the pay is marginal. For the vast majority, no job sits waiting at the end of the rainbow. Only the few make it through multiple “cycles,” the term for a campaign period. It is grueling on the body. Other areas of life are suspended or simply dropped. A campaign becomes all-encompassing. From the day you start until at least Election Day, it’s an all-day, every-day job. The sacrifices are sometimes hidden and private, little things you did that only you or maybe one or two who were right there will ever know or appreciate. And it all happens with the possibility that you won’t ultimately win.

What sustains most who elect this work is two things – the intense bonds of friendship one develops, and the connection to a larger sense of meaning. For the Obama staff who danced and reunited this week, culminating at the Armory last night, there was a kind of rare and unadulterated pleasure in a monumental mission accomplished.

No part of the evening was as special to this group as the heartfelt expression of appreciation from the President himself, who spoke for longer and more personally than he had at the Youth Ball the previous evening. The President, who is a community organizer at heart, knows personally and precisely what this group did to reach this moment.

“There’s one guy I get choked up whenever I see him and that’s David Plouffe,” Obama said. Citing Plouffe’s extraordinary focus on the task at the expense of personal drama, Obama again connected the twin themes of service and meaning – reminding everyone that working and striving for “something bigger than yourself” is how the campaign’s culture remained so strong and uniform. Moreover, Obama argued, that connection to serving a bigger goal would carry the “kids” arrayed before him throughout their lives.

Another subtle but memorable moment of the night was Joe Biden telling the crowd that during his entire public career and lifetime he’d never seen any sight as amazing as the one when he looked back across the Mall on Tuesday. As he spoke, it was clear both Bidens were moved by that memory from their unique vantage, as Joe’s voice became temporarily uneven and Jill nodded, mouth quivering.

There was humor in the speeches too, with Obama suggesting that he’d won against the daunting odds in part because his many young members of the campaign team simply didn’t know any better. Biden used the word “literally” and chuckled with self-awareness.

Still, this was the Gene Hackman-in-Hoosiers “I love you guys” night. Even Jay-Z made a point of expressing his personal gratitude to the staff on a capstone party that was all heart and hugs and dancing.

The official celebrations are now over. The tuxes, gowns, dresses and suits are back on their hangers. Bitter cold that began the week has given way to relative warmth. The overwhelming mass of humanity that descended on the capital has mostly migrated home to the near and distant corners of the country.

Already, the new administration has set its jaw soberly into the wind. The country voted for significant changes in public policy both foreign and domestic, and the urgency to get moving is palpable.

But for a final moment last night, the people that organized and strategized Obama’s win shared each other’s company and those sealed, lifetime bonds of friendship. Not to be forgotten.

And oh, yes. Jay-Z’s line. A rousing chorus, shouted triumphantly by the greatest political campaign staff the country has ever seen, summed up exactly where the country finds itself as the new President assumes office.

“99 Problems But a Bush Ain’t One.”

*-*

A Personal Note

One of the great privileges of my life is partnering with Nate over the past year at FiveThirtyEight and getting the front seat to history, from Big Stone Gap to Reno to Miami, from Denver to St. Paul to Grant Park. Nate hasn’t mentioned it, but we won the annual Weblog Award for 2008 Best Political Coverage last week. Ours is a great story of simply doing something you love with not just brains but heart and hard work, with no guarantee of outcome or reward. Finding success with that approach is the most satisfying aspect, and it certainly helps us stay grounded in gratitude. Nobody travels alone.

A special mention to Brett Marty, whose photography deserves wide acclaim. Along the road we were treated with hospitality and kindnesses from too many people to mention individually. We needed all of it.

This week in Washington was incredible. For a political moment, it had a quality that transcended normal descriptive categories tethered to partisan politics – rarely is an era’s end and one’s beginning so dramatically obvious in real time. As Nate said, it was a proud moment for America.

For us, 2008 was the beginning. I’m settling into DC and we’re ambitious, plotting more coverage in the coming year and years. Let’s face it, as Americans increasingly consume information online, new media has a critical role to play in reporting and analysis. We’ll be feeling our way and certainly asking for help.

64 comments

Charlotte said...

I just want to say I've been keeping up with your site ever since I saw Nate on the Colbert Report... you guys are amazing, keep up the good work, and thanks for the excellent coverage you've been providing about the election and politics thus far.

DaWolf said...

welcome back Sean, haven't seen a post of yours for a little while!

STepper said...

Great post, Sean. And we all know you won the weblog award. I did my part. I voted for the website 154,625 times with my bot.

(A lie. I actually voted twice, once at my office and once at my house.)

I hope you guys get rich with your book deal after this. But make sure Nate has an indefatigable editor. Maybe someone from the campaign who won't mind working long hours.

Geoffrey said...

Glad to hear you both have received the much deserved recognition. The site was something completely unique during the campaign and I will be here reading as long as you keep blogging.

Nate - don't forget about BP though!

Keep up the great work guys.

RufusRules said...

Great to see you back, Sean! We've missed you and your wonderfully evocative writing. I'm excited about the next four years and look forward to watching the adventure unfold along with you guys.

[ tyler curtain ] said...

Sean, I love your writing. Keep it coming. Congrats on the Weblog win. So well deserved.

And congrats at being part of the Obama story. That rocks.

Bernard said...

>>Bitter cold that began the week has given way to relative warmth.
And what more succinct summary of the mood of the country than that?

Juris said...

@STepper: Hey, you slacker! I voted 6 times a day for several days running! My 4 personal computers and 2 office computers. Still, Nate and Sean didn't exactly need our extra votes. They creamed the competition.

Patricia said...

Brett's photos are some of the best of the entire universe of images. He catches the light, the heart, the soul of American political life on the ground like no other photojournalist. And Nate...I still look at the graphs of electoral votes and remember how my apprehension turned into action and my action (and an economic crisis) turned possibility into reality. When you called Ohio... I turned off the tv forever. I'm all in for the blogosphere. I voted for all y'all. Congratulations!

William Land said...

Thanks for all that you guys do!
Much appreciated.
Wishing you all the best in all of your endeavors.

Ben Alpers said...

Congrats, Sean and Nate! You richly deserve the award. Your site is really one of the treasures of the interwebs. As a political junkie and a U.S. historian, I am deeply grateful for all that you do!

capt said...

All I can say is THANKS!

You guys RAWK!

Joe The Fake Virginian said...

Sean Quinn, Brett Marty and Nate Silver

Thanks again for being my second favorite part of the 2008 election cycle. Your insights, pictures and multiple regressions, in no particular order, are etched in my mind.

My favorite part of the 2008 election cycle was, of course, the swearing in of the 44th President of the United States, Barack Obama. My favorite NON-Brett image came from the AP through the Boston Globe (boston.com) It was off a somber EX-President bush flying away in a Marine Corps helicopter, knowing it was not called MARINE ONE.

I am glad President Obama schooled him on eight years of horrible policies, the worst being the shredding of the bill of rights in the name of "safety". Give my those rights back and if something untowards happens to me, at least I lived a life of freedom.

Wa - 7th said...

The election was eleven weeks ago, but FiveThirtyEight is still my home page. I first heard about this site back in June from this article in Seattle's Stranger weekly, and I was hooked as soon as I arrived here.

You three have a unique synergy. I look forward to the next contribution from each of you, and it's not the same when one of you misses more than a day or two. Any two of you definitely need to prevent the other one from ever escaping. The only thing better than FiveThirtyEight is tomorrow's FiveThirtyEight.

pdb said...

I add my thanks for the amazing coverage in the election and beyond. This site was many times THE source for information and exactly what was happening in the field. I look forward to your continued coverage.

Berkeley Bear in Illinois said...

Add my thanks to the bunch.

I first heard of this site in a Camp Obama session with 300 others who came through a monsoon to be part of something bigger than ourselves, when Nate (briefly) was projecting a slim McCain win (Palin bump). I was blown away then by the staffers, and every contact with a staffer from that point on was the same - energy, eagerness and dogged determination to do this one great thing. I hope all the folks I ran into were able to make their way to DC for the thank you they so richly deserved.

As for Sean, Nate and Brett - you deserve all the accolades you are getting. May they be the first wave of many, many more.

Caredwen said...

Congratulations, Sean, Nate, and Brett. I can think of no coverage of this election as deserving of recognition as yours. You brought the ground story and the numbers together in a coherent and moving way that will never be duplicated-- thank you.

Obama comparing Plouffe's work ethic to a scene in The Departed with Mark Wahlberg was pretty priceless, too...

Sean Quinn said...

Thank you guys.

I'm kicking myself for leaving that Departed reference out. What Obama said was that David Plouffe's attitude and focus was like Mark Wahlberg's character in The Departed:

"I'm the guy doing my job. You must be the other guy."

Joe the Pope said...

OT: Did you guys see that DP has reported picked Gillibrand to replace HRC? LOL! That jihad against Caroline was really well thought out considering that the junior senator from New York is now Mark Pryor with a vagina. Well done, Kos!

such sweet thunder said...

Sean, your writing in this post reminded me why I loved your and Nate's and Brett's work over the past year. All of your abilities complement each other. It's analytics meets heartstrings meets breathtaking photography.

You guys provided better, more compelling coverage than the major networks and CNN. Kudos.

Vote said...

Coleman Files Additional list of Potential Errors. Another court date set for tomorrow, full details and analysis of court documents.

liberal_defender_of_freedom said...

The ceremonies were definitely a great ending to the build up to the Presidency of Obama. I didn't have the vantage point you all had but was on the mall for the concert and the inauguration. What a great week.

And congratulations on the web award.

Kennyb said...

I just want to add my thanks to Nate, Sean and Brett for adding intelligence, enjoyment and some laughs to this last year. 538 made this election so enjoyable and intellectually stimulating. And I'd also like to thank all my fellow posters here for you (usually) polite discourse and complementary comments.

It was one of you who encouraged me to stop reading political blogs at lunchtime at go make calls at the Obama office. Thanks to that, I feel like maybe I made a difference and I know I met some great people.

JMNorris said...

I made calls for Obama on election day. The first few calls, about three, were to Virginia, then they switched us to calling Missouri (or, as they told us to say it, Missour-uh). I spent about two hours total. I had never done this sort of work before and was not very good at it. So I blame myself for the loss in Missouri. But I still got my Team Obama Department of Inebriation cup.

And, of course, I read the posts of Nate and Sean faithfully. Or rather, I faithfully read .... Thanks for the great posts and thanks to Brett for the great photos.

DCM in FL said...

JMN

with an abundance of caution, I predict that you will get your own chance for a do-over [on those phone calls to MO] in less than 4 years since we are in the era of the never-ending campaign cycle

so keep practising !

O, and best of luck in DC to SEAN O'Quinn

DCM in FL said...

sorry but I disagree with Jay-Z

should be more like:

'99 problems & Bush caused all but one of them'

hoping Obama draws to an inside straight in dealing with them

Statler N Waldorf said...

It's Senator Gillibrand

Susan Weston said...

Nate and Sean,

You have to make this new media thing work:

1. because you're great.
2. because a new way of moving knowledge is being born and has to survive.
3. because four weeks ago I decided Kentucky education news had to be blogged, and I need role models.

DCM in FL said...

Gillibrand seems like she might be another Blue Dawg in the Senate, no ?

is that really the best & brightest that Paterson can come up with ?

I was hoping for a real out-of-the-box nomination

Gillibrand will be able to raise the finacing to run again in both 2010 & 2012 when the term ends ?

she will have to sell her soul & keep up a never ending campaign financing 24/7 for the next 48 months

unless she gets knocked off in the primaries in 2010 anyway

not a fan of this appointment

Statler N Waldorf said...

Here's Kristen Gillibrand in a nutshell

* Voted YES on expanding research to more embryonic stem cell lines. (Jan 2007)
* Ensure access to and funding for contraception. (Feb 2007)
* Voted YES on defining "energy emergency" on federal gas prices. (Jun 2008)
* Voted YES on revitalizing severely distressed public housing. (Jan 2008)
* Voted YES on regulating the subprime mortgage industry. (Nov 2007)
* Retire half the public debt by 2006. (May 2001)
* Voted YES on prohibiting job discrimination based on sexual orientation. (Nov 2007)
* Re-introduce the Equal Rights Amendment. (Mar 2007)
* Voted YES on allowing stockholder voting on executive compensation. (Apr 2007)
* Screen imports & ban lead in children's products. (Feb 2008)
* Voted YES on expanding services for offendors' re-entry into society. (Nov 2007)
* Increase funding for "COPS ON THE BEAT" program. (Jan 2007)
# More funds for NCLB and early education. (Nov 2006)
# Voted YES on additional $10.2B for federal education & HHS projects. (Nov 200
* Raise CAFE; plus alternative energy R&D. (Nov 2006)
* Voted YES on tax incentives for renewable energy. (Feb 2008)
* Voted YES on investing in homegrown biofuel. (Aug 2007)
* Voted YES on criminalizing oil cartels like OPEC. (May 2007)
* Voted YES on removing oil & gas exploration subsidies. (Jan 2007)
* Balance fossil fuels and viable renewable energy. (Jul 2001)
* Protect American jobs from going overseas. (Nov 2006)
* Voted YES on promoting free trade with Peru. (Nov 2007)
* Voted YES on assisting workers who lose jobs due to globalization. (Oct 2007)
* Block NAFTA Superhighway & North American Union. (Jan 2007)
* No lobbyist gifts. (Nov 2006)
* Voted YES on requiring lobbyist disclosure of bundled donations. (May 2007)
* Voted YES on granting Washington DC an Electoral vote & vote in Congress. (Apr 2007)
* Voted YES on protecting whistleblowers from employer recrimination. (Mar 2007)
* Supports Shays-Meehan Campaign Finance Reform. (Jul 2001)
Ban gun registration & trigger lock law in Washington DC. (Mar 2007)
* Medicare for all; allow drug reimoprtation. (Nov 2006)
* Voted YES on giving mental health full equity with physical health. (Mar 2008)
* Voted YES on Veto override: Extend SCHIP to cover 6M more kids. (Jan 2008)
* Voted YES on adding 2 to 4 million children to SCHIP eligibility. (Oct 2007)
* Voted YES on requiring negotiated Rx prices for Medicare part D. (Jan 2007)
* Better and immediate funding for Medicare & Medicaid. (Dec 2000)
* Prescription drug benefit within Medicare. (Jun 2000)
* Improve services for people with autism & their families. (Apr 2007)
* Establish a national childhood cancer database. (Mar 2007)
* Voted YES on requiring FISA warrants for wiretaps in US, but not abroad. (Mar 2008)
* Voted YES on Veto override: Congressional oversight of CIA interrogations. (Mar 2008)
* Voted NO on removing need for FISA warrant for wiretapping abroad. (Aug 2007)
* Voted YES on restricting no-bid defense contracts. (Mar 2007)
* Extend reserve retirement pay parity back to 9/11. (Dec 2007)
* Restore habeas corpus for detainees in the War on Terror. (Jun 2007)
* Voted YES on overriding presidential veto of Farm Bill. (Jun 2008)
* Voted YES on restricting employer interference in union organizing. (Mar 2007)
* Voted YES on increasing minimum wage to $7.25. (Jan 2007)
* Voted YES on retroactive immunity for telecoms' warrantless surveillance. (Jun 2008)
* Voted YES on $23B instead of $4.9B for waterway infrastructure. (Nov 2007)
* Permanent ban on state & local taxation of Internet access. (Oct 2007)
* Iraq: exit strategy & redeploy troops. (Nov 2006)
* Voted YES on redeploying US troops out of Iraq starting in 90 days. (May 2007)

Visual Representation

Statler N Waldorf said...

DCM, relax. Gillibrand is very pro-GLBT. She will take care of us.

Her conservatism is fiscal conservatism, not social

DCM in FL said...

she, she voted the party line in congress on many issues

BUT what makes HER out of all others the best qualified for this Senate seat ?

2 whole years in congress.... big whoop

oh, and from a politically connected family in Albany...

how about on LGBT ? per wiki:


'On gay rights, Gillibrand has received an 80 out of a 100 rating from the LGBT advocacy group the Human Rights Campaign, which is the lowest score out of New York’s Democratic representatives'

comeon, she is not Alfonse D'Amato but she is a Blue Dog in a progressive state so WTF

she looks like easy picking for a well-funded GOPer candidate like Giuliani, Bloomberg or even King since she will have to run for the seat in BOTH 2010 & 2012

also, she will probably bring out opposition in the DEM primaries, since at least one other NY DEM has already declared that she will challenge her

Nick said...

Nate Sean and Brett,

This was my favorite site during the election. I still come by from time to time. Congrats on the award.

And a huge congrats to EL 44TH PRESIDENTE OBAMA! The impurities have been cleansed from America!

Michael said...

Nate, Sean, and Brett:

Congratulations!

It's been great fun to vicariously take this journey with you all. I look forward to your continuing political coverage.

gotoran said...

You guys are the absolute best! I love your matter of fact writing style, your prescience, and your ability to analyze in a succinct, non-pretentious way. Kudos to the whole gang...especially Nate. I even have some of my sniveling goper friends checking out your site from time to time. Keep up the SUPERB work!

Robby said...

Congratulations; you guys deserve it.

RufusRules said...

HEY FIVETHIRTYEIGHT FANS, this site is up for awards in several categories in the 2009 Bloggies, a different contest from the award it just won: Best Political, Best New Blog, and Blog of the Year(!!!).

So show your love (& do your civic duty as a citizen of the blogosphere) and GO VOTE now.

Nate, Sean: You guys should post a link on the main page to this; there's no shame in shameless self-promotion.

Robert said...

This site helped me get through a most anxious time. Awaiting election day in those final weeks, the predictions in the 90's for Obama kept me from completely losing it when all the the talking heads wanted me to believe that McCain had a shot in PA.

I only wish I had believed you in October and booked my hotel room in DC then. I ended up a $40 cab ride from the Glenmont station in friggin Maryland. But I was there, my wife was there and my 8 and 5 year-olds were there. What an honor to witness a turning point in our country's history. Not often when you can ID those in the present, but out on that mall that cold day, it was different. You could feel it. I still can.

Keep it up guys, you deserve all of your success.

Chris said...

I can't even remember when I found FiveThirtyEight. I think it was during the summer some time. But I've been addicted ever since, though it's only been since the election that I've started commenting more.

I will say this, though: This site, by far, was the best for poll dissection this cycle, and the commentaries and analysis were also quite interesting. Again, thank you guys for...well, for keeping me distracted between lectures.

Off-topic now: Oh jeez, DCM, she still has a freaking 80/100 score on gay rights. Even if that's the worst in New York State, that's still pretty freaking high and likely higher than many (if not most) Florida reps. It's been oft-said that New York's Republicans are anywhere else's Democrats, and I'm inclined to say that's true in much of the Northeast.

I think that, of the potential Blue Dogs in the Senate (and her pet issue is gun rights), she'd be one of the easiest to pick off into the D column - she's not just representing District 20 now, she's covering the entire state, including downstate (which is about half of the population of NYS).

Not only that, she's up for election TWICE in the next four years, as you've pointed out. I don't think she's going to go out and vote to oppress the gays.

And if you're going to rag on her qualifications: She was technically more experienced than the previous Class I Senator from NY, whose prior claim to fame was marrying a saxophone player and cigar aficionado who just happened to live at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue for eight years. (Now, I like Hillary, and she got elected, but c'mon.) I have faith in her abilities.

alteran1 said...

Yes, like Robert said, your site helped me maintain my sanity during the election.
When everyone was saying its too close to call, when the pundits were still saying its 50/50, when my friends and family disillusioned by the 2000 election claimed it didn't matter, that the republicans would still steal it no matter how people voted, and when my grandmother was still insisting that Obama was a secret Muslim terrorist and his wife was the Antichrist lol (I was terrified that she was a common case, luckily she decided to vote Nader, since she didn't like McCain much either), you were there to reassure my fears.

I was one of the few, that because of your site, was convinced that Obama had it in the bag even a month before the election. :D

I expected FiveThirtyEight to just sort of stop after the election, i thought you were a one time thing lol, but now you will remain my main source of political news (aside from Reddit, where you appear often anyway haha, thats where I found you). Your RSS feed will sit right at the top of my iGoogle homepage for years to come.

Thanks so much, for being honest, unbiased, reliable, and most of all unbelievably accurate (I swear, its like you guys predicted the future how close your predictions were to the results, barely a decimal off, damn you're good).

Let's hope you're here for a long while, I'll be here listening ^^

Joe said...

I have been following since early in the primaries, and I still come here at least once a day. The analytical work is still top-notch, and the commentaries are becoming a bigger and stronger part of the site

rays242 said...

This post is a suggestion to Nate:


Can we have a daily feature showing the % chance of Obama getting assassinated on each given day and the factors/analysis of why the % is rising or falling on each given day.


Even if the range throughout his presidency was from 0.25-5%, it would still be interesting nonetheless.


I implore you to take on my great idea.

Thanks!!!

mhz said...

welcome back Sean, it is great to hear from you. Keep the "KiDS" going.

My first presidential election was a choice between Walter Mondale and Ronald Raygun. While I have deep respect and admiration for Senator/VP Mondale he does and did not represent appreciable change. He may have wanted it and worked tirelessly for it, but it was clear that he, like Carter, was not going to be able to deliver given the inertia in the system. I cannot remember if I even voted, Raygun was an obvious evil and Mondale was sadly impotent. I often wonder how the world would look today if Gorbachev had been able to work with WJ Clinton rather than Raygun. Reason, accuracy, compassion, and respectful discourse could have done so much at that crucial point in world history. Russia had it in full measure with Gorbachev, while the US delivered up a uninformed Hollywood dropout.

Again Sean and Nate- your work is invaluable- may we never again elect a puppet as POTUS.

fred said...

Great to see you back Sean.

Why hasn't rays242 been blocked yet?

Dji said...

Welcome to DC. Remember: you haven't settled in until you decide on a favorite Ethiopian restaurant. I suggest Etete.

It's a great city. Enjoy.

Joe The Fake Virginian said...

fred

Trolls only grow if you FEED them. Ignore them and they shrink.

As always, DNFTT.

DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS

That is all. We now return to our regularly scheduled programming on "As The Fivethirtyeight Turns."

rays242 said...

I am NOT a troll.


I am making an honest request for a daily feature. It is not as if things are so busy now anyway.


What is so wrong with that?

countscruffula said...

I think what made you guys the best political predictions is the science of what you've done. I hope you are able to keep your intense focus on statistics done right!

Lots of people have blogs; few are scientific.

Thank you, you have provided countless information and satisfaction for me.

Mrs B said...

I love this site. Nate and his stats and his endearing typing errors, Brett's photos, and Sean's lyricism and enthusiasm - but also all the posters (well most of them, a few exceptionsm, who appear to have either serious mental health issues or serious sense of humour failures).

Congrats on the weblog award - I voted every day!

mhz said...

Sean and Nate will you be posting any, all, most congressional votes with a map graphic?

zozie said...

My congratulations to all three of you.

You are a real team - innovative, authoritative, and unconventional.Reasons to keep on reading here.

Simplerich said...

I can't remember how I found you but you rapidly became my go-to site for all news electoral and political this election cycle.

I can't stress how important you were to my feeling like an informed citizen through the past few months and how much I appreciate the work you did.

You were always part of the feeds I checked on getting up and before going to bed and I'd like to extend a huge "Well done!" from a very appreciative reader.

Congrats on the award!

Parula said...

Team 538.com:

I haven't commented before, but I want to join the throng of admirers and well-wishers here. I came to 538 after seeing Nate on Colbert, and this site has been my go-to for insight and analysis ever since.

Congrats on the award, and I expect you'll get more. Keep up the refreshingly cogent work -- it's a pleasure to read. And I'd like to thank the knowledgeable commenters here, too. I've learned a lot from you guys.

Another Mike said...

Nate's analysis has been insightful and clearly presented. Your on-the-road series was great reading and covered a part of the campaign no one else did. Brett's photos were beautiful and reminded me of the rich diversity of our country.

Well done to the three of you. You deserve all the success coming your way. I truly look forward to more to come.

Obamateers57 said...

best line of the staff ball for me was when my girlfriend said yes to my marriage proposal, started our relationship on election day, engaged on inauguration. Just gotta get Obama to administer the vows now. Thanks for being awesome 538

Critter said...

Congrats on the award! This was my favorite site leading up to the election and I still read it everyday. A well deserved award. Keep up the good work.

Joe The Fake Virginian said...

DNFTT

Do Not Feed The Trolls

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)

The text below is copied UNEDITED (sections) from the WIKI above and is used as reference.

An Internet troll, or simply troll in Internet slang, is someone who posts controversial, inflammatory, irrelevant or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum or chat room, with the intention of provoking other users into an emotional response[1] or to generally disrupt normal on-topic discussion.[2]

Usage
Application of the term troll is highly subjective. Some readers may characterize a post as trolling, while others may regard the same post as a legitimate contribution to the discussion, even if controversial. The term is often used to discredit an opposing position, or its proponent, by argument fallacy ad hominem.

Often, calling someone a troll makes assumptions about a writer's motives. Regardless of the circumstances, controversial posts may attract a particularly strong response from those unfamiliar with the robust dialogue found in some online, rather than physical, communities. Experienced participants in online forums know that the most effective way to discourage a troll is usually to ignore him or her, because responding tends to encourage trolls to continue disruptive posts — hence the often-seen warning: "Please do not feed the trolls".[11]

Frequently, someone who has been labelled a troll by a group may seek to redeem their reputation by discrediting their opponents, for example by claiming that other members of the group are closed-minded, conspirators, or trolls themselves.

=dcsohl said...

@rays242, you really don't see anything wrong with wishing and advocating the death of a fellow American? Really? That ain't right. There's something very very wrong with you.

I mean, why not wish for his administration to go down in scandal? Another Whitewater or cigar? Those scenarios would arguably be better for Republicans like yourself than if Obama were to be killed.

Consider: choice a) Obama dies, country rallies around President Biden, we see another landslide like in 1964. Choice b) Obama gets embroiled in scandal, Republicans have a real shot at winning the White House in 2012. Which is what you want, right? You don't literally want him dead, you just want him not to be the president, right?

Unless you're just an angry ****head who's pissed that an uppity black man is the President. That's a definite possibility.

dkan71 said...

Thanks Sean, Nate and Brett for your amazing coverage of the Election and its aftermath.

I don't check here with the crack-addicted regularity I did pre Nov. 4th, but I still count on this site to have among the very best, most intelligent political coverage anywhere.

What gives this site the extra special sauce is the heart that's evident in your writing and Brett's photography. Kudos. Your contribution has been amazing.

QueenTiye said...

Congratulations guys! You definitely deserve the Weblog award! :)

QT

Alex said...

It was great for all of us on the Obama campaign to spend one last night together. When Barack was speaking to all of us I could tell that he truly appreciated all the sacrifices so many of us made. Its hard to imagine when I started campaigning for him in Feb 2007 as part of Students for Barack Obama that we would make it this far. It also a sad night to know that we really were saying goodbye to Barack and each other. I wasn't really sure if I would ever be able to look back at what my generation accomplished and be proud, but after Tuesday I can say that in the years to come I will be proud of the job we did in getting Barack elected and helping to save the country we love so much in the process.

slag said...

Glad the campaign staff got its much-deserved recognition. Good leadership.

jasonberlin.com said...

You guys are fucking AWESOME!!! You saved my life and my friends' lives during the campaign!! This is an EXTREMELY impressive site, and I tell everyone I can about it. I check in every day 2 or 3 times. Thank you so much for this site!!! And keep it up!

revknits said...

Congrats - I voted for the webloggies and the other one. Sean, Nate and Brett, you are the three Musketeers of this election coverage.

Stay true to who you are, and it's so great that the coverage continues!