Adem Will Attempt Any (Privacy) Li(e)
hierophant
alt.privacy lately. Mostly it's just a flame war structured around the
fine people of Wilders users and their anonymous trolls. However,
apparently-real posters occasionally speak up. Here's one from
Adem/Privacy.Li:
In the Re: Deciding On A VPN thread, Noone <no...@here.tld> aka Adem
wrote:
"That's not the real Steve Topletz, it's a troll that must have been
kicked off Wilders and is now trying to make the entire crew look bad.
His current goal appears to be to try to start up another privacy.li
flamefest in here by claiming everyone is Adem."
Followed by Adem's Sock Puppet Rooster who loudly proclaims time and
time again: "It wasn't me, I swear." ;)
In response, "Steve Topletz" (from our Wilders User Group) wrote:
"Excellent obfuscation, Adem; Now to your proof of these claims? "
Dishearteningly, Adem and none of his socks have responded. :(
--
herem...@hushmail.com
http://heremypants.weebly.com/
Searching_____
Are we playing follow the troll?
I thought ignorance of them was the best solution. Could you make up
your mind and lead us?
--
An alkaline environment is detrimental to the "flu" organism, hence
alkalizing agents and an alkaline-reacting diet are helpful.
Edgar Cayce for Edgar Cayce Diet Recommendations
MBAM - I put that shit on everything!
hierophant
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 01:11:25 -0500, hierophant wrote:
>
>> Since posting to Usenet, I have been following the drama on
>> alt.privacy lately. Mostly it's just a flame war structured around the
>> fine people of Wilders users and their anonymous trolls. However,
>> apparently-real posters occasionally speak up. Here's one from
>> Adem/Privacy.Li:
>>
>> In the Re: Deciding On A VPN thread, Noone <no...@here.tld> aka Adem
>> wrote:
>>
>> "That's not the real Steve Topletz, it's a troll that must have been
>> kicked off Wilders and is now trying to make the entire crew look bad.
>> His current goal appears to be to try to start up another privacy.li
>> flamefest in here by claiming everyone is Adem."
>>
>> Followed by Adem's Sock Puppet Rooster who loudly proclaims time and
>> time again: "It wasn't me, I swear." ;)
>>
>> In response, "Steve Topletz" (from our Wilders User Group) wrote:
>> "Excellent obfuscation, Adem; Now to your proof of these claims? "
>>
>> Dishearteningly, Adem and none of his socks have responded. :(
>
> Are we playing follow the troll?
> I thought ignorance of them was the best solution. Could you make up
> your mind and lead us?
That is rule 101, of course. However, IMHO, it depends. Ignoring
adolescent lulzers playing king of the hill is always prudent. OTOH,
ignoring disruption attacks on discussions of security, privacy and
anonymity may be foolish.
In all cases, "do as I preach not as I do" :)
--
herem...@hushmail.com
http://heremypants.weebly.com/
nix
I agree. It would be irresponsible not to issue occasional
clarifications when necessary. Otherwise, the purpose of this
newsgroup is undermined. Mined. Strip. Stripped. The attacks are
obviously calculated to disrupt communication among posters to this
both Wilders and here. Noise. Static discharge. Pollution. EPA?
Asleep? ')
NTL, at all costs, "Protect Thy Wizard",,,! And whizzer! ;)
--
I want love and kisses and ponies in a field of pornographic pleasure.
My favorite website ;0) www.platanalytics.com
Call/email the Owner ;) Nancy Norelli 305.926.8245
nnor...@platanalytics.com
http://uscybercomresistanceleague.com/full-operationalcapability/
katio
Listen up, Moe. You get your free Xerobank accounts for kneeling @
Topletz feet, what else do you get for fellating him in public?
katio
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 01:11:25 -0500, hierophant wrote:
>
>> Since posting to Usenet, I have been following the drama on
>> alt.privacy lately. Mostly it's just a flame war structured around the
>> fine people of Wilders users and their anonymous trolls. However,
>> apparently-real posters occasionally speak up. Here's one from
>> Adem/Privacy.Li:
>>
>> In the Re: Deciding On A VPN thread, Noone <no...@here.tld> aka Adem
>> wrote:
>>
>> "That's not the real Steve Topletz, it's a troll that must have been
>> kicked off Wilders and is now trying to make the entire crew look bad.
>> His current goal appears to be to try to start up another privacy.li
>> flamefest in here by claiming everyone is Adem."
>>
>> Followed by Adem's Sock Puppet Rooster who loudly proclaims time and
>> time again: "It wasn't me, I swear." ;)
>>
>> In response, "Steve Topletz" (from our Wilders User Group) wrote:
>> "Excellent obfuscation, Adem; Now to your proof of these claims? "
>>
>> Dishearteningly, Adem and none of his socks have responded. :(
>
> Are we playing follow the troll?
> I thought ignorance of them was the best solution. Could you make up
> your mind and lead us?
Larry, no questions. Moe speaks, you do.
katio
Curlycunt, why you have this unusual sexual fetish, crotch verbiage,
porn videos about pussy and dicks then want us to buy into your inner
self which intends to take down USCYBERCOM?
It's a pathetic consequence that I have put up with the three of you
in order to stay on Wilders, but not here, Kiddo.
Looking at your photo and Junking your emails about how wide and
wet-drippy your curlycunt is, might I suggest that you take Topletz
virtual dick and wrap your giraffe legs around it, stroke and squeeze,
and drink down...until you die?