Talk:Building 429

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The dog has a dollar.

Untitled[edit]

Just to let you know...they are done with the Rise Tour!!! So I want to know if I can change the part about them currently being on that tour. Thank you. Later!!! Chili14 (Talk) 20:50, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

you are more then welcome to fix any dated facts that are in the article --T-rex 02:39, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Record Label[edit]

Someone had erased the entire INO Records section and replaced it with a bold-text sentence statiing that the band had signed to Essential Records during the summer of 2010. There were no references cited. I checked the band's website and Myspace, which still list INO as their label. I also checked Essential's artist roster and did not find them listed. They are not listed at INO, either. Even if the label change is true, there obviously has been no official statement made from either the band or the label, so I have removed the statements regarding the label change from the History section as well as the intro, restoring the INO section and original text, respectively.65.15.217.61 (talk) 19:27, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus to merge. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:56, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply] 

(non-admin closure)

I'm not convinced that splitting off Building 429 discography is justified under WP:CONSPLIT or WP:SIZESPLIT. Any thoughts? – Arms & Hearts (talk) 20:42, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I disagree. I think that their discography was split off at the right time considering the size of their main article. Royalbroil 00:30, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Building 429 currently stands at 18,000 bytes, while Building 429 discography is just over 5,000 bytes. The combined ~23,000 is less than half of the 50kB rule of thumb for when an article may need to be split. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 04:01, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support as main article requires some cutting due to being parts being unsourced. Is it 'Christian Fuhrer' or 'Christian Führer' Regards, SunCreator (talk) 18:36, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Primarily since it's been more than half a year and second, it seems like the other article will only grow.I can't see many band articles including eight albums in them. Granted, two of those albums are not notable and one is currently unreleased, but the discography is better kept out. I propose that it's time to close the merger discussion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:51, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Given that the separation of discographical information is now de rigeur and given that the discography page is rather well fleshed out, there doesn't seem to be any particularly good reason to merge it back. Chubbles (talk) 03:01, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Per above.HotHat (talk) 04:19, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Building 429. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:02, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Building 429. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:20, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Building 429. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:13, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Building_429&oldid=1221004108"