Princess cut: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

23 March 2024

18 January 2023

11 November 2022

22 September 2022

18 August 2022

30 April 2022

16 September 2021

23 August 2021

21 October 2020

6 April 2020

10 October 2019

30 August 2019

9 August 2019

9 July 2019

5 July 2019

8 April 2019

2 April 2019

29 January 2019

18 January 2019

22 August 2018

13 June 2018

14 April 2018

18 December 2016

26 September 2016

3 July 2016

1 June 2016

17 May 2016

6 April 2016

23 March 2016

3 November 2015

  • curprev 02:5402:54, 3 November 201576.10.163.183 talk 4,283 bytes −144 Removed the complete sentence as it refers the brilliance of a princess cut is the same as the round cut. There is no literature from any accredited gemological institute that states princess cuts emit the same brilliance as the round cut. Please provi... undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 02:4002:40, 3 November 201576.10.163.183 talk 4,427 bytes −7 Princess cut is less brilliant than a round due to its shape. I could not find any supporting documents from reputable sources that show a princess cut has the same brilliance as a round. I changed the wording to reflect that it does not have the same... undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

24 August 2015

18 November 2014

21 September 2014

27 June 2014

22 June 2014

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)