ケンブリッジ分析学派の興亡

DOI Web Site Web Site 参考文献4件

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • The Rise and Fall of the Cambridge School of Analysis:
  • ケンブリッジ分析学派の興亡 : 「言語論的転回」はいつ起こったのか?
  • ケンブリッジ ブンセキ ガクハ ノ コウボウ : 「 ゲンゴロンテキ テンカイ 」 ワ イツ オコッタ ノ カ?
  • When did the “Linguistic Turn” Happen?
  • ―「言語論的転回」はいつ起こったのか？―

この論文をさがす

抄録

<p>    It is commonplace to characterize analytic philosophy in terms of the so-called “linguistic turn.” Recent historical studies, however, tell or remind us that analytic philosophy is not unified with regard to its methods or subject matters. The purpose of this paper is to contribute toward the accurate picture of the history of analytic philosophy, with a focus on the group of philosophers that was called “Cambridge Analysis” or the “Cambridge School of Analysis” in the 1930s. Firstly, the paper exposes the methods and conceptions of metaphysics championed by members of the Cambridge School of Analysis, such as G. E. Moore, B. Russell, L. S.Stebbing, and J. Wisdom. Secondly, the paper argues that when the Cambridge School of Analysis was succeeded by Cambridge Ordinary Language School in the late 1930s, metaphysics started being conceptualized linguistically.</p>

収録刊行物

  • 科学哲学

    科学哲学 51 (2), 3-27, 2018-12-30

    日本科学哲学会

参考文献 (4)*注記

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ