ライフサイエンスコーパス: straw

1 ng communities grown on wheat straw and rice straw.

2 es by thiol-containing peptides in roots and straw.

3 ving the Cu(2+) ion sorption capacity of the straw.

4 on capacity of Cu(2+) ions by the esterified straw.

5 culture filtrate of A. niger grown on wheat straw.

6 re heavier than straw (Delta(114/110)Cdgrain-straw = 0.10 to 0.51 per thousand).

7 th-occluded carbon (PhytOC) contents in rice straw; (3) Positive correlations between the phytolith p

8 Herein, we present STRAW, a web server that offers workflows for reconstruc

9 atic C horizontal lineC of pretreated barley straw adsorbent and pi* carbon atom in benzene ring atta

10 aminated water was done by pretreated barley straw adsorbent obtained from raw barley straw after mod

11 ley straw adsorbent obtained from raw barley straw after modification by H3PO4 impregnation and micro

12 conducted utilizing actual runoff, DOC from straw and compost, and a suite of TOrCs.

13 llulose-degrading communities grown on wheat straw and rice straw.

14 preparations from wheat (Triticum aestivum) straw and subsequently in all monocot samples examined.

15 nol generated from corn grain, stover, wheat straw, and biodiesel from soybean.

16 be explained by specific exposures to cows, straw, and farm milk for asthma and exposure to fodder s

17 O3)2-extractable Cd soil pool, and in roots, straw, and grains.

18 ational scenario in which corn stover, wheat straw, and Miscanthus are converted to 1.4 EJ (60 billio

19 ddition resulted in significant increases in straw- and husk-Si.

20 this effect can be mitigated by delaying the straw application to three-leaf stage.

21 esource managers to dependably plan how many straws are needed to safely cryopreserve a genetic line.

22 for predicting plant-available As, husk and straw As concentrations were the most significant predic

23 tive, while the mixed use of wheat and wheat straw as feedstocks would be the most cost-effective one

24 Total grain- and straw-As was negatively correlated with pore-water Si, a

25 four common poaceous biomass sources (wheat straw, barley straw, corn stover, and sugar cane bagasse

26 ts amended with different percentage of rice straw biochar (RC).

27 tion of sugars derived from pre-treated rice straw biomass and differential sensitivities to fermenta

28 rter, increase grain yield at the expense of straw biomass, and are more resistant to damage by wind

29 Barley straw (BS), a very low-cost material, has been utilized

30 ransvaginal paracentesis removed 4 liters of straw-colored fluid, resulting in significant short-term

31 ell lines, we report that cells from African straw-colored fruit bats (Eidolon helvum) are refractory

32 xoviruses in an urban-roosting population of straw-colored fruit bats in Ghana.

33 majority (70%) of historical accessions had straw-colored hulls, only 30% of contemporary HR weedy r

34 , only 30% of contemporary HR weedy rice had straw-colored hulls.

35 The straw-coloured fruit bat, Eidolon helvum, is Africa's mo

36 mount of reducing sugars released from wheat straw compared with the same system lacking the laccase.

37 d alkyl carbons for both the wheat and maize straws compared with no-sunlight control.

38 tes, in comparison with samples grown on oat straw (control).

39 oaceous biomass sources (wheat straw, barley straw, corn stover, and sugar cane bagasse), and lignin

40 process, has been largely overlooked during straw decomposition in mesic ecosystems.

41 egradation when explaining the mechanisms of straw decomposition in mesic ecosystems.

42 ted the mass loss and chemical structures of straw decomposition in response to elevated UV-B radiati

43 tribution of photodegradation to the overall straw decomposition process.

44 per thousand), and grains were heavier than straw (Delta(114/110)Cdgrain-straw = 0.10 to 0.51 per th

45 We examined the ability of rice straw-derived biochar to reduce CH4 emission from paddy

46 runoff was more enhanced by compost DOC than straw DOC (particularly for atrazine, prometon, benzotri

47 energy distribution of the pretreated barley straw for levofloxacin adsorption was estimated based on

48 When you reach with your straw for the final drops of a milkshake, the liquid for

49 compared with control samples grown on wheat straw from non selenium-rich areas (141 vs 0.17 mug Se g

50 cies of oyster mushrooms, was grown on wheat straw from the seleniferous belt of Punjab (India) and i

51 eas historical weedy rice was separated into straw-hull and black-hull populations.

52 from chimneys at hydrothermal vents to soda straws in caves.

53 of assay substrates, and breakdown of wheat straw lignocellulose by recombinant DypB is observed ove

54 Charney creates a straw man out of the myth of an immutable genetics, and

55 r single- and multiple-cell origin models as straw men that can be improved on and hopefully lead to

56 ree treatments were used in this experiment: straw mulch (SM), plastic film mulch (PM) and convention

57 supplemental experiment thus confirmed that straw mulching at the seedling stage may lead to yield r

58 cell walls, including those in the grain and straw of economically important cereals.

59 r 12 weeks (GC-1g); and (3) 3 g daily (60-75 straws of spaghetti) for 2 weeks (GC-3g).

60 Increasing SOC through straw organic amendments enhances PIC accumulation in th

61 ability and properties of recalcitrant wheat straw polymers.

62 aired and included conventional tillage with straw removed (CT0), conventional tillage with straw ret

63 lage with straw retained (CTS), no-till with straw removed (NT0), no-till with straw retention (NTS),

64 with straw retention (NTS), subsoiling with straw removed (SS0), and subsoiling with straw retained

65 nonlabeled and uniformly (13)C labeled wheat straw, respectively, and characterized by heteronuclear

66 raw removed (CT0), conventional tillage with straw retained (CTS), no-till with straw removed (NT0),

67 ith straw removed (SS0), and subsoiling with straw retained (SSS).

68 -till with straw removed (NT0), no-till with straw retention (NTS), subsoiling with straw removed (SS

69 fixation efficiency (CFE) were observed for straw retention treatments.

70 oration with fertilizer, and fertilizer with straw return treatments.

71 ultivation practices (i.e. fertilization and straw return) since the early 1980s were the main driver

72 ter amendments and reduced-till coupled with straw return, estimated at 0.31 to 0.83 Mg CO2 -equivale

73 ustainable goal in China's mollisols region, straw returning, optimized nitrogen fertilization and no

74 In the study, rice straw (RS, low-quality) and alfalfa hay (AH, high-qualit

75 Wheat and maize straw samples with and without soil contact were exposed

76 f ethanol from corn grain, stover, and wheat straw shows extremely wide variances with a national ave

77 correlations between phytolith contents and straw SiO2 contents and between phytolith contents and p

78 Hydrolysis of pretreated wheat straw suggested that this mechanism of synergism is oper

79 Thirty-two lambs were fed with barley straw supplemented by a concentrate alone, or a concentr

80 nd to ferment hydrothermally pretreated rice straw under simultaneous saccharification and fermentati

81 farm exposure, that is, exposure to cows and straw vs no exposure at all.

82 rts, Cd isotopes were markedly fractionated: straw was isotopically heavier than roots (Delta(114/110

83 Barley straw was thermochemically modified with citric acid (CA

84 groups on the surface of the modified barley straw were primarily responsible for the sorption of Cu(

85 decomposition rates of both wheat and maize straws when in contact with soil.

86 owed (1) Increased Si concentrations in rice straw with increasing application rates of silicate fert

87 bient radiation by 9-16% for wheat and maize straws without soil contact after 12 months.

88 The effect of supplementation of wheat straw (WS) with raw/detoxified mahua cake (MC) on yield