ライフサイエンスコーパス: recall

1 g and etap2 = 0.227, P = .004 for extinction recall).

2 with shock and CS without shock during fear recall.

3 nhances memory for words and increases false recall.

4 013, diet was assessed every 6 mo via a 24-h recall.

5 to the classical cognitive paradigm of free recall.

6 the forced-swim test and deficits in memory recall.

7 epilepsy monitoring engaged in episodic free recall.

8 hese DAN>MBON synapses and can weaken memory recall.

9 ating characteristics curves, precision, and recall.

10 rd higher precision and others toward higher recall.

11 subnetwork with relative high precision and recall.

12 ied brain structures activated during memory recall.

13 dict pattern reinstatement during later free recall.

14 from an abstract representation, like memory recall.

15 l formation as central to memory storage and recall.

16 stable representations to facilitate memory recall.

17 nd right hippocampal volume and with delayed recall.

18 synaptic hippocampal plasticity, and memory recall.

19 comparing ranges of precision, accuracy, and recall.

20 s and implicated in memory consolidation and recall.

21 was collected with the use of a 24-h dietary recall.

22 d with the use of 3 consecutive 24-h dietary recalls.

23 [worst] points), and Logical Memory Delayed Recall (0 [worst] to 25 [best] story units).

24 an automated fashion with high precision and recall (0.81 F1 score).

25 0.04 (0.14); and for Logical Memory Delayed Recall, 13.1 (3.3).

26 the entire follow-up duration: 1) number of recalls; 2) compliance, calculated from registered atten

27 nterval [CI]: 21.5%, 25.2%), and mammography recalled 217 (recall rate, 11.1%; 95% CI: 9.7%, 12.6%).

28 the mean of 6 measurements of a 24-h dietary recall (24-HR) as a reference and to apply a unique meth

29 nvestigators use self-reports (e.g., 24-hour recalls (24HRs)) as the reference instrument.

30 It also recalls 26.7% of DCDs with 72.7% precision on the protei

31 Of the 153 household deaths recalled, 53 deaths (34.2%; 95% CI 22.1%-46.3%) were ass

32 Data from 24-hour diet recalls (55% in the wet season) of n = 6,226 participant

33 a predefined set (e.g., animals), we rarely recall a wrong exemplar (e.g., a vegetable).

34 tal eye movements (EMs) while simultaneously recalling a traumatic memory, which renders the memory l

35 significantly correlated with verbal (RAVLT recall after interference, r = -0.48; P = .02) and visuo

36 d intraoral radiographic examinations at the recalls after 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 84 mo.

37 ry less vivid and emotional when it is later recalled again.

38 Following the delayed retrieval, they freely recalled all videos outside of the scanner.

39 ses reflect contextual retrieval, as correct recalls alone arise from the correct context.

40 Immediate and delayed recall also showed associations with the anterior lobe.

41 When we recall an experience, we rely upon the associations that

42 rt computational methods, CCmiR had a higher recall and a higher precision.

43 miR predicted miRNA target sites with a high recall and a reasonable precision, and identified known

44 Kmer-SSR option has 100% precision and 100% recall and accurately identifies every SSR of any specif

45 Performance measures including recall and cancer detection rates, sensitivity, specific

46 escribe a mechanistic model of human network recall and demonstrate its sufficiency for capturing hum

47 e use of two mutually complementary metrics, recall and discrimination.

48 We hypothesize that recall and faster relearning reflect different learning

49 gnitive test that examines verbal and visual recall and is a valuable addition to the assessment of p

50 people recalling the same event than between recall and perception, indicating systematic reshaping o

51 Positive predictive value of recall and positive predictive value of biopsy were lowe

52 fter parameter adjustment, validated for its recall and precision.

53 performance of different methods in terms of recall and precision.

54 arkers of dietary intake are unconfounded by recall and reporting bias, and using multiple dietary bi

55 (2) some responses may have been subject to recall and social desirability bias, and (3) patients or

56 ed ketamine-induced impairments in immediate recall and the 2-Back and spatial working memory tasks (

57 approached significance in the AVLT delayed recall and was not significantly associated with perform

58 ly modulated during encoding of subsequently recalled and forgotten words.

59 T) discriminability), moderate (AVLT delayed recall) and high (Logical Memory Test (LMT) delayed reca

60 outcomes were change in knowledge (quiz and recall) and satisfaction, assessed by questionnaires at

61 ning and r = -0.464, P = .004 for extinction recall) and the number of co-occuring anxiety disorders

62 ion accuracy with metrics such as precision, recall, and F-score.

63 nsduced Tregs also were able to suppress the recall antibody response of murine splenocytes from FVII

64 livered at the respective sites at a 6-month recall appointment.

65 sociated with performance on the LMT delayed recall, approached significance in the AVLT delayed reca

66 ously, memories of past experience are often recalled as episodes with defined beginnings and ends.

67 volume and activation during episodic memory recall, as measured by blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOL

68 up to 4 automated self-administered 24-hour recalls (ASA24s) over a 1-year period in the women's Lif

69 ssessed through a mean of three 24-h dietary recalls at baseline and 6 mo.

70 were collected in 2 sets of three 24-h food recalls at baseline and year 2.

71 literature in terms of area under precision recall (auPR) curve.

72 onstrate its sufficiency for capturing human recall behavior observed in experimental contexts.

73 primary (keyhole limpet hemocyanin; KLH) and recall (Bet v 1) Ags (H4B4*KLH and H4B4*Bet v 1) induced

74 ediate (beta = -0.48; p = 0.030) and delayed recall (beta = -0.47; p = 0.030).

75 For Logical Memory Delayed Recall, between-group score was not statistically signif

76 mental exposures, avoiding pitfalls, such as recall bias and confounding by ongoing exposures, diseas

77 have the potential for misclassification and recall bias, which can attenuate the measured associatio

78 al aggregation of risk without the threat of recall bias.

79 exposure data introduces the possibility of recall bias; therefore, results should be interpreted ca

80 Adjustments for selection and recall biases did not materially affect interpretation i

81 After adjustment for selection and recall biases, the odds ratio was 2.2 (95% limits: 1.3,

82 response group differences during extinction recall, brain activation patterns between anxious and he

83 elicited by a previous DENV3 infection were recalled by immunization.IMPORTANCE The dengue epidemic

84 vo, with maintenance of a subset that can be recalled by restimulation, analogous to T-cell effector

85 ble - for years in some cases - before being recalled by the FDA for unanticipated toxicity in humans

86 sis of these detected QTLs, we estimate that recall-by-genotype studies that use iPSC-derived cells w

87 as in performance as gauged by precision and recall, calculated by comparing our RNA-Seq results to t

88 hen preincubated with CMV antigens, induce a recall CD4(+) TH1 proliferation response only in CMV-ser

89 al baseline connectivity was correlated with recall, cerebellar-thalamic baseline connectivity was co

90 Australian adults.Dietary data from two 24-h recalls collected during the cross-sectional 2011-2012 A

91 points were rescue neuroleptic use, delirium recall, comfort (perceived by caregivers and nurses), co

92 Our method increases precision and recall compared to traditional peak calling algorithms,

93 improvement in the area under the precision-recall curve in general phosphorylation site prediction

94 aches in terms of AUPR (area under precision-recall curve) and AUC (area under curve of receiver oper

95 A significantly weakened Ag-specific recall cytokine production response was also found for I

96 The FDA Recalls Database was used to identify associated safety

97 During extinction recall (day 3), the cue paired with TMS to target 1 show

98 tin-depolymerizing agent latrunculin induced recall deficit after cFC in WT mice, indicating the impo

99 This led to recall deficit after contextual fear conditioning (cFC)

100 Recalled devices underwent more frequent postapproval mo

101 text fear acquisition; (2) inhibition during recall did not impair fear expression in the training co

102 ever, when awakened from sleep, we sometimes recall dreams and sometimes recall no experiences.

103 cronutrient intake (assessed by using a 24-h recall during late gestation) with infant BMI peak chara

104 wed that the pre-exposure representation was recalled during conditioning (due to similarity between

105 ose To compare two-dimensional (2D) gradient-recalled echo (GRE) and 2D spin-echo (SE) echo-planar im

106 lure rate of MR elastography with a gradient-recalled-echo pulse sequence was low at 1.5 T but substa

107 of the liver with a two-dimensional gradient-recalled-echo pulse sequence.

108 443) or 1.5 T (n = 338) by using a gradient-recalled-echo pulse sequence.

109 nctions, but only among individuals actively recalling emotional states linked with such experiences.

110 y selected subset of our sample was asked to recall emotions of anxiety and fear connected to experie

111 from pretest to posttest and follow-up after recall+EMs relative to the control conditions.

112 However, memories become less vivid after recall+EMs.

113 participant questionnaires as information on recall error and selective participation.

114 on of sodium and potassium are unaffected by recall errors and represent all sources of intake, and w

115 prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) during extinction recall (etap2 = 0.178, P = .02).

116 range between 0.02 and 0.003) and extinction recall (etap2 range between 0.111 and 0.235 and P range

117 sed autobiographical methods, whereby people recall events from their lifetime, often after being cue

118 transient reactivation linked to individual recall events.

119 gnificantly changed with DBT, with increased recall examinations for architectural distortion and mas

120 distortion and mass (P < .001) and decreased recall examinations for asymmetries (P </= .001).

121 There was no change in recall examinations for calcifications (P = .977).

122 Recall examinations were classified according to finding

123 and high (Logical Memory Test (LMT) delayed recall) executive/semantic components.

124 s NALTs served as the induction site for the recall expansion of memory CD8(+) T cells following infl

125 ies and lower cognitive control in the group recalling experiences of violence, whereas it had no eff

126 ng both on overall use and use stratified by recalled finding type and outcome at 2 years.

127 The distribution of recalled finding types significantly changed with DBT, w

128 Risk category, age, recall for workup of screening-detected abnormalities, b

129 3 assessment at diagnostic examination after recall from screening in a large urban population after

130 ls are urgently needed because lepirudin was recalled from the market; danaparoid access has been lim

131 ases (unhealthy and healthy obesity).Dietary recalls from 11,748 participants (>/=18 y of age) in the

132 Neural signals that differentiate correct recalls from both other retrieval classes reflect contex

133 dorsal DG during context fear conditioning, recall, generalization, and extinction in male mice.

134 e, the ability to induce expression of rapid recall genes upon activation is associated with the depo

135 Recalling highly emotional autobiographical memories enh

136 Verbal Learning Test-Revised delayed verbal recall (HVLT-R-DR) after four ECT treatments, using a Ga

137 ation increased encoding-state estimates and recall if delivered when the classifier indicated low en

138 Ten of the twenty-three peptides assayed recalled IFN-gamma responses mediated by CD8(+) T cells

139 sequences of syllables for immediate serial recall in a Hebb repetition learning task that simulates

140 rrelates of fear conditioning and extinction recall in anxiety disorders and to document how these fe

141 SynEM yields 97% precision and recall in binary cortical connectomes with no user inter

142 fficient to rescue the altered remote memory recall in COMT-Val-tg mice and increased PFC dopamine le

143 -specific cellular memory responses could be recalled in human volunteers exposed to P. falciparum pa

144 Institute method to adjust two 24-h dietary recalls (including dietary supplements) for within-perso

145 f, the percent of positive specific memories recalled increased relative to baseline and to the contr

146 reativity in science requires the ability to recall information and data, and will suffer if we rely

147 Both groups had a significant improvement in recall (intervention, 56.7% vs 82.1%, P < 0.001; control

148 th contextual retrieval, we compared correct recalls, intrusions (incorrect recall of either items fr

149 We find that human recall is predicated on accurate recall of a small numbe

150 s, its impact on remote memory formation and recall is still poorly explored.

151 Declarative memory recall is thought to involve the reinstatement of neural

152 Data recall is via a highly configurable keyword search.

153 Asked to freely recall items from a predefined set (e.g., animals), we r

154 to experiences of violence, whereas the rest recalled joyful or emotionally neutral experiences.

155 tively associated with verbal memory delayed recall (left: beta = -0.52, p = 0.021; right: beta = -0.

156 tively associated with verbal memory delayed recall (left: beta = 0.44, p = 0.037; right: beta = 0.67

157 repertoire was occupied by a small number of recall lineages that did not decline during vaccine resp

158 is task, subjects were asked to memorize and recall lists of common nouns.

159 uced: (1) impairments in verbal learning and recall measured by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test; (2)

160 Recall measures the consistency of the perturbed pathway

161 e for (or at least important in) storing and recalling memories (i.e., a memory trace).

162 The three epitopes also predominantly recalled more CD45RA(low) CD44(high) CCR7(low) CD62L(low

163 nclear if tetravalent vaccines can elicit or recall nAbs.

164 ted by viewing aversive images (Study 1) and recalling negative autobiographical memories (Study 2) u

165 ep, we sometimes recall dreams and sometimes recall no experiences.

166 ledge graph reaching precision of 0.85 for a recall of 0.6 in the clinical evaluation.

167 -0.98), a mean precision of 0.61, and a mean recall of 0.81, with superior performance in neovascular

168 -0.97), a mean precision of 0.91, and a mean recall of 0.84.

169 entations) and completion performance (i.e., recall of a memory in light of noisy input) that are ess

170 that human recall is predicated on accurate recall of a small number of high degree network nodes an

171 nt antigens but instead suggested anamnestic recall of antibody to earlier influenza virus strains.

172 engrams, the release of innate responses and recall of associative memories can occur through focused

173 d dissociable roles during both encoding and recall of aversive consequences of behavior.

174 animals, an autoassociative network enables recall of complete memories to underpin object/event rec

175 ptogenetic silencing of the VH prevented the recall of contextual fear memory in mice, indicating its

176 ary CTL response they did not respond with a recall of CTL memory but, instead, with robust Ag-specif

177 c changes in neuronal excitability following recall of drug-environment associations.

178 thin neuronal ensembles activated during the recall of drug-environment associations.

179 CD8 T cell memory is characterized by rapid recall of effector function, increased proliferation, an

180 pared correct recalls, intrusions (incorrect recall of either items from prior lists or items not pre

181 shown to reduce conditioned freezing during recall of extinction memory.

182 e in the immune systems of infected hosts to recall of memory B cells that recognized the lateral pat

183 Recall of picture-word associations and subjective ratin

184 was also induced in the shrimp by the memory recall of postingestive aversive effects (vomiting), evo

185 aluate the association between 24-hr dietary recall of poultry consumption and arsenic exposure in th

186 OMT selectively and reversibly modulated the recall of remote memories as silencing COMT Val overexpr

187 Here, we show that recall of remote, but not recent, visual fear memories i

188 nhances memory for words and increases false recall of semantically related words.

189 , or schemata that simplify the encoding and recall of social information.

190 mbining four cognitive tests (free and total recall of the Free and Cued Selective Reminding test, te

191 tion of the former would no longer result in recall of the latter.

192 ive impairments in acquisition and immediate recall of the trained platform location.

193 We find that recall of threat memory, measured with fear-potentiated

194 -item WM task of encoding and immediate free recall of word lists.

195 There have been multiple high-profile recalls of devices approved as PMA supplements.

196 The recalls of reactions and dead ends of DEF reach around 7

197 ion tools in a balance between precision and recall on three eukaryotic species: human, yeast, and fl

198 d increased the percent of specific memories recalled on an autobiographical memory test.

199 y variables and that use of multiple 24-hour recalls or 7DDRs as a comparison method provided similar

200 iple granular short-term instruments such as recalls or records over time in addition to FFQs among a

201 cant improvements in immediate verbal memory recall over time.

202 synthetic 2D imaging: 23.3% versus 12.9% of recalled patients who were screened with FFDM (RR, 1.81;

203 terrieth Complex Figure Test [ROCF], delayed recall: patients, 16.0 [1.96]; controls, 25.86 [1.24]; P

204 ditory Verbal Learning Test [RAVLT], delayed recall: patients, 6.52 [1.05]; controls, 11.78 [0.56], P

205 approach (SEA), we achieve higher precision-recall performance relative to SEA with ECFP on ChEMBL20

206 sual areas that persists throughout the free recall period and reflects the targeted category.

207 cognitive interviews where the instructions, recall period, and response categories were evaluated fo

208 years with a livebirth in the 5-year survey recall period, and women were assigned to one of three g

209 ined major non-fatal injuries over a 6-month recall period.

210 Deficits in acquisition, recall, perseveration, and reversal learning were eviden

211 an unnecessary liver biopsy according to the recall policy.

212 ization for Research and Treatment of Cancer recall policy.

213 The recall populations for DM and DBT were 1112 of 10 728 (1

214 e, biopsy rate, positive predictive value of recall, positive predictive value of biopsy, cancer dete

215 Operating Characteristic (ROC) and Precision Recall (PR) curves.

216 work, we derive a fundamental lower-bound on recall precision, which declines with storage duration a

217 Using the metrics of recall, precision and ARI (Adjusted Rand Index), [Formul

218 larger verbal memory deficits (RAVLT delayed recall, r = -0.40; P = .049), decreased volumes of left

219 .48; P = .02) and visuospatial (ROCF delayed recall, r = -0.46; P = .03) memory deficits.

220 me of the left CA2/3 subfield (RAVLT delayed recall, r = 0.40; P = .047) and impaired left hippocampa

221 in a large community-based practice improved recall rate and positive predictive values without loss

222 the assembly-based approach had a much lower recall rate and precision comparing to the alignment-bas

223 After experience with DBT, the recall rate increased 0.65% for each year from 2012 to 2

224 Before experience with DBT, the recall rate increased only 0.01% for each year from 2009

225 Results The average recall rate was 6.8% (range, 3.6%-9.7%) before experienc

226 The recall rate was similar between groups (RR, 0.95; 95% CI

227 (RR, 0.95; 95% CI: 0.84, 1.06), whereas the recall rate with invasive assessment was higher for DBT

228 21.5%, 25.2%), and mammography recalled 217 (recall rate, 11.1%; 95% CI: 9.7%, 12.6%).

229 mmended in 461 screening MR imaging studies (recall rate, 23.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 21.5%,

230 Recall rate, biopsy rate, positive predictive value of r

231 Purpose To compare screening mammography recall rate, cancer detection rate (CDR), and positive p

232 Recall rate, CDR, PPV of positive screening result (PPV1

233 Conclusion Recall rate, CDR, PPV2, and PPV3 of digital mammography

234 nity-based screening population by analyzing recall rate, positive predictive value, and cancer detec

235 lus synthetic 2D imaging increases CDRs with recall rates comparable to those of FFDM.

236 Results Recall rates were significantly lower with DBT-s2D mammo

237 Infection of B cells by HCV inhibited the recall reaction to antigen stimulation.

238 n the formation of long-term motor memories: recall, reflecting a retrieval of previous motor actions

239 activation [4], was greater prior to correct recalls relative to the other retrieval classes, with no

240 xts) and the shock also became linked to the recalled representation, resulting in greater generaliza

241 antigenically distinct H1N1 virus elicited a recall response against the original HA that was no long

242 cytokine response was sustained on allergen recall response in the lymph nodes and spleen.

243 The mechanisms behind this rapid recall response of the memory cells are still not comple

244 s and their optimal secondary expansion in a recall response.

245 s residing in the lung and airways developed recall responses successfully.

246 Induction of recall responses within white adipose tissue was associa

247 g of CD8 T cells in old mice yields superior recall responses, establishing a key contribution of thi

248 tor response, possibly to facilitate optimal recall responses.

249 ses, the cVLP group also demonstrated strong recall responses.

250 in left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex while recalling resulted in activation in dorsolateral prefron

251 apical revascularization with 6- to 66-month recalls, root apices remained open in 13.9% cases (types

252 line to 6 and 12 months in delayed paragraph recall score among men with AAMI in the testosterone and

253 6 months and 12 months for delayed paragraph recall (score range, 0 to 50) among men with AAMI.

254 a brain burden, and with lower delayed total recall scores in the logical memory test.

255 tery (Word List Learning, World List Delayed Recall, Semantic Animal Fluency) and Six-Item Screener (

256 ithmic processes used by humans to store and recall social information.

257 property that enables regenerating cells to recall spatial information from the uninjured tissue.

258 They were prompted to recall specific instances of frequently-occurring commun

259 After OVA recall, specific IgE concentrations were reduced by a me

260 s, the Rotterdam Study and the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study.

261 ed in 4116 participants of the Heinz Nixdorf Recall study.

262 ted to meet the requirements associated with recall such as rapid memory updating and retrieval-drive

263 vivo, PRMT5 blockade efficiently suppressed recall T cell responses and reduced inflammation in dela

264 d yet is dispensable for host protection and recall T cell responses during secondary WT WNV infectio

265 ography monitoring engaged in a delayed free recall task to test short-term memory.

266 e 6.5 y with a hippocampus-dependent delayed-recall task.

267 5 epilepsy patients as they performed a free recall task.

268 involvement of the cerebellum when immediate recall tasks involve more complex verbal stimuli (e.g. l

269 We tested this model using cued recall tasks, in which subjects had to memorize object a

270 Mental performance was measured by a free-recall test, and physical performance by power output on

271 Upon secondary recall, TET2-deficient memory CD8(+) T cells demonstrate

272 e interval, 1.1-1.9) in the period preceding recall than did nonrecalled devices (median, 0.5; IQR, 0

273 rginine were assessed using repeated 24-hour recalls that were administered throughout pregnancy.

274 s, patterns were more similar between people recalling the same event than between recall and percept

275 oss-sectional study with 40 healthy students recalling their overprotective upbringing, we show an in

276 s and places), patients were asked to freely recall these items, targeting each category in separate

277 s minimizing nonparticipation and inaccurate recall, this record linkage-based study is less prone to

278 es into awake, behaving animals and of later recalling those ensembles selectively by stimulating ind

279 e top-down mechanism that biases spontaneous recall to remain within the required categorical boundar

280 e (AUC) as a metric to measure the precision-recall trade-off of our algorithm, reporting associated

281 ows, different workflows exhibit a precision/recall tradeoff, and the ultimate choice of workflow sho

282 each spike on the probability of successful recall using a generalized logistic mixed model.

283 cognitive flexibility, immediate and delayed recall, verbal learning, and visuomotor coordination wer

284 d in Germany aimed to separate the effect of recalling violent events from the effect of emotions of

285 The positive predictive value (PPV) for recall was almost doubled with DBT plus synthetic 2D ima

286 Moreover, brain response to recalling was significantly higher than encoding in medi

287 CI: 6.83%, 12.36%) and that for mammography recalls was 6.5% (95% CI: 3.57%, 10.59%).

288 Positive predictive value for MR imaging recalls was 9.3% (95% CI: 6.83%, 12.36%) and that for ma

289 ala, a physiological correlate of successful recall, was absent in rats with degraded PNNs in V2L.

290 Mean scores for delayed paragraph recall were 14.0 at baseline, 16.0 at 6 months, and 16.2

291 or whom a 24-h urine sample and 24-h dietary recall were available and who were selected for their ex

292 Dietary recalls were analyzed with the use of nutritional analys

293 Four record-assisted 24-hour dietary recalls were collected from each participant with specia

294 urvey; n = 6278), collected by a single 24-h recall, were analyzed.

295 enuation from within-person variation in the recalls, were calculated between 24-HRs and FFQs and bet

296 ), and deliberations (matched periods during recall when no items came to mind).

297 , BoostGAPFILL shows above 60% precision and recall, which is more than twice that of other existing

298 ble memory performance in both free and cued recall while being simultaneously compatible with experi

299 nses during positive autobiographical memory recall with real-time functional magnetic resonance imag

300 cipants completed 3 nonconsecutive 24-h diet recalls, wore accelerometers for 7 d, and self-reported