ライフサイエンスコーパス: orthopedic

1 a wide variety of procedures, most commonly orthopedic.

2 esthesia techniques with focus on outpatient orthopedics.

3 oncology, cardiology, gastroenterology, and orthopedics.

4 adgear, a device widely used in craniofacial orthopedics.

5 f the most rapidly growing subspecialties in orthopedics.

6 sts the therapeutic potential of this ion in orthopedics.

7 al (30.19%), cardiothoracic (19.6%), and the orthopedic (11.13%) categories.

8 %), including medical (18%), radiation (8%), orthopedic (22%), and surgical oncologists (45%).

9 surgical subspecialties were general (29%), orthopedic (23%), and cardiothoracic (13%).

10 Our sample included 211,231 surgeries-45.4% orthopedics, 37.0% general, and 17.6% vascular.

11 study sample included 237,441 surgeries: 43% orthopedic, 39% general, and 18% vascular.

12 th clean procedures (382 cardiothoracic, 167 orthopedic, 61 vascular, and 56 other), mupirocin/chlorh

13 pecialty (vascular 15.4%, general 12.9%, and orthopedic 7.6%, P < 0.001).

14 sthesia (18.1%), emergency medicine (18.1%), orthopedics (7.9%), otolaryngology (7.0%), neurosurgery

15 , 12.5%; urology, 9.0%; neurosurgery, 10.5%; orthopedic, 9.6%; otolaryngology, 9.5%; plastic, 12.2%;

16 the 90th-percentile HHI were between $5.85 (orthopedics; 95% CI, $3.46-$8.24) and $11.67 (internal m

17 ndexes at the 90th-percentile HHI were 8.3% (orthopedics; 95% CI, 5.0%-11.6%) to 16.1% (internal medi

18 roviding future insights into the origins of orthopedic abnormalities.

19 Of the patients studied, 2.6% experienced an orthopedic adverse event after THR.

20 of THRs and the occurrence of perioperative orthopedic adverse events, defined as deep wound infecti

21 the association between hospital volume and orthopedic adverse events.

22 ecializing in dermatology, gastroenterology, orthopedics, allergy, anesthesiology, surgery, rheumatol

23 Efforts to enhance bone regeneration in orthopedic and dental cases have grown steadily for the

24 personal protective apparel, and ending the orthopedic and ergonomic consequences of the interventio

25 vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis methods in orthopedic and neurological patients.

26 es remain (eg, chest tubes, diagnostics, and orthopedic and neurosurgical care; mean ratings </= 2).

27 obilize soon after their procedures, such as orthopedic and neurosurgical patients.

28 has been intensively studied in the field of orthopedics and is known to provoke aseptic loosening ar

29 ications for the use of SP cells in clinical orthopedics and stem cell-based disorders of bone.

30 l types of major cardiac, general, vascular, orthopedic, and cancer surgical procedures.

31 ients who underwent predominantly abdominal, orthopedic, and neurological procedures.

32 ly confirmed; controls were general surgery, orthopedic, and trauma patients who were frequency match

33 olutionize how clinicians treat such diverse orthopedic applications as the healing of broken bones,

34 ess rate of titanium implants for dental and orthopedic applications depends on the ability of surrou

35 eoconductivity for dental, craniofacial, and orthopedic applications.

36 CPC) scaffolds for dental, craniofacial, and orthopedic applications.

37 er construct may be promising for dental and orthopedic applications.

38 implantable scaffold for cardiovascular and orthopedic applications.

39 ne regeneration in dental, craniofacial, and orthopedic applications.

40 cluding those designed for wound healing and orthopedics applications, have received Food and Drug Ad

41 This report will update the medical and orthopedic approaches to care for children with osteogen

42 Dentistry and orthopedics are undergoing a revolution in order to prov

43 rizes recent developments in the genetic and orthopedic aspects of Marfan syndrome.

44 This review presents genetic and orthopedic aspects of type II, IX, and XI collagen disor

45 se using a functional status score (Japanese Orthopedic Association [JOA] score), (18)F-FDG uptake, a

46 radiology from other clinics primarily from orthopedics; between January 2011 to May 2014.

47 Key process improvements have included using orthopedic billings to identify patients, referring pati

48 he main cellular infiltrate during S. aureus orthopedic biofilm infection, accounting for >75% of the

49 Secondary endpoints included neurologic, orthopedic, cardiac, respiratory, ophthalmologic, audiol

50 injured her right wrist and presented at an orthopedic clinic due to nonspecific pain 6 months later

51 synovial exudates of 13 people attending the orthopedic clinic with traumatic knee injuries or underg

52 the likelihood of receiving a referral to an orthopedic clinic.

53 willingness and receipt of a referral to an orthopedic clinic.

54 ve codes less than 60 and selected operative orthopedic codes between 79.8 and 84.4.

55 urgeons is the most important determinant of orthopedic complications and should be considered in eff

56 tor inhibitors on the risk for postoperative orthopedic complications is limited, contradictory and s

57 ysfunction, other neurologic conditions, and orthopedic conditions) were examined.

58 ian LOS was greatest (42%) for patients with orthopedic conditions.

59 trician with a comprehensive overview of the orthopedic considerations and potential issues in a chil

60 and for those with a referral, to attend an orthopedic consult (61% versus 50%).

61 Orthopedic consultation should be sought for long-bone f

62 , rheumatologic, radiologic, psychiatric and orthopedic consultations is shown including successful t

63 der and major depressive disorder (MDD), 110 orthopedic controls, and 1734 adult first-degree relativ

64 249 [99.6%] were white) who presented at the orthopedic departments of 32 acute UK National Health Se

65 luid samples from prosthetic joint and other orthopedic device infections.

66 fluid which forms a lubricant in the actual orthopedic device.

67 an important opportunistic pathogen causing orthopedic-device-related infections (ODRI).

68 ments made to physicians by manufacturers of orthopedic devices provides an opportunity to assess the

69 uelae to inflammatory, ocular, neurologic or orthopedic diseases.

70 most current research on CMT, including its orthopedic elements, and the opinion of specialists in p

71 pathway of physical impairment with cardinal orthopedic elements.

72 (SH1DF) and managed with immobilization and orthopedic follow-up.

73 However, evidence suggests that orthopedic forces clinically modify the growth of the ma

74 Thus, headgear-generated orthopedic forces evoke bending of the zygomatic arch an

75 orthodontic tooth movement or influenced by orthopedic forces through fixed appliances.

76 ing of the anabolic and catabolic effects of orthopedic forces.

77 included establishing reliable referral from orthopedic fracture care to osteoporosis diagnosis and t

78 nated for all willing and able patients with orthopedic fragility fractures in our health system by a

79 ve seizures, psychiatric co-morbidities, and orthopedic, gastrointestinal, and growth problems as wel

80 all 5 clusters-cardiothoracic, neurosurgery, orthopedic, general, and urologic surgery had received t

81 ed alive from Veterans Affairs hospitals for orthopedic, general, and vascular conditions between Oct

82 ical data from oral anticoagulant studies in orthopedic/general surgery and extrapolation to actual c

83 or row CT is an effective tool for depicting orthopedic hardware complications.

84 MSSA osteoarticular infection; 64 (52%) had orthopedic hardware involvement.

85 s the management of botulism associated with orthopedic hardware.

86 Skin lesions (P=0.002), orthopedic illness (P<0.001), cataract (P=0.003), hypert

87 (TiO(2)) surface nanostructures utilized for orthopedic implant considerations.

88 Thirty-six patients (84%) had orthopedic implant devices: prosthetic joints (n = 34) o

89 to study the association between statins and orthopedic implant failure and to explore the influence

90 [SD, 15]; women, 274 [57%]; median time from orthopedic implant placement, 11 months [interquartile r

91 efits of using TiO(2) nanotubes for enhanced orthopedic implant surfaces.

92 portant risk factors for infection following orthopedic implant surgery.

93 Analyses using a mouse model of orthopedic implant-associated biofilm formation found th

94 We compared orthopedic implant-associated Staphylococcus aureus infe

95 oped in response to chronic ACD caused by an orthopedic implant.

96 In a mouse model of biofilm-associated orthopedic-implant infection, three different combinatio

97 ntitis, endodontic lesions, and loosening of orthopedic implants caused by lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-c

98 Orthopedic implants containing biodegradable magnesium h

99 elow the knee who were undergoing removal of orthopedic implants from 19 hospitals (17 teaching and 2

100 Explanted orthopedic implants from 54 patients with aseptic failur

101 The historical success of orthopedic implants has been recently tempered by unexpe

102 g patients undergoing surgery for removal of orthopedic implants used for treatment of fractures belo

103 n the incidence of SSIs following removal of orthopedic implants used for treatment of fractures belo

104 12.2% has been reported following removal of orthopedic implants used for treatment of fractures belo

105 o osteoblasts laying down new bone tissue on orthopedic implants.

106 oporosis, fracture healing, and loosening of orthopedic implants.

107 roved bacterial recovery from the surface of orthopedic implants; however, it lacked specificity, due

108 Ongoing advances in orthopedics include discoveries of functions of matrix p

109 tion, are being pursued for cardiac disease, orthopedic injuries and biomaterial fabrication.

110 to determine which exogenous cells best heal orthopedic injuries remain poorly defined.

111 ed concussion with those after sport-related orthopedic injuries to areas other than the head (nonhea

112 uries and thoracic, peripheral vascular, and orthopedic injuries.

113 ncussion (n = 68) or a nonhead sport-related orthopedic injury (n = 61) followed up participants for

114 nts with concussion than among those with an orthopedic injury (odds ratio, 5.85; 95% CI, 1.61-21.22)

115 n serum samples of MMTBI, severe TBI (STBI), orthopedic injury and healthy controls were used and miR

116 TBI groups were compared to orthopedic injury group and an up-regulation of 18 and 2

117 n of 39, 37 and 33 miRNAs in MMTBI, STBI and orthopedic injury groups respectively.

118 e real time PCR data for the MMTBI, STBI and orthopedic injury was normalized to the control samples

119 mpared with 3 of 60 patients (5%) who had an orthopedic injury.

120 -related concussion or nonhead sport-related orthopedic injury.

121 Orthopedic intervention occurs on several levels: includ

122 ions with regard to optimizing the timing of orthopedic interventions such as arthroplasty.

123 ther types of surgeries evaluated, including orthopedic joint replacement procedures.

124 cohort, all patients who underwent cardiac, orthopedic joint replacement, vascular, colorectal, and

125 Craniofacial bone strain upon orthopedic loading has rarely been characterized, despit

126 emodeling and mandibular repositioning under orthopedic loading.

127 iated urologic, gynecologic, neurologic, and orthopedic malformations has been recognized.

128 ian with a review of disorders that have the orthopedic manifestation of joint hypermobility.

129 The major orthopedic manifestations of Marfan syndrome include sco

130 nic cells and is stimulating new avenues for orthopedic material surface designs.

131 osteogenesis have important applications in orthopedic, maxillofacial, and periodontal treatment.

132 joints (OR = 5.01, 95% CI: 1.60, 15.71) and orthopedic metallic fixation devices (OR = 1.95, 95% CI:

133 urrent modulation technique in patients with orthopedic metallic prostheses.

134 72) who underwent major digestive (n = 586), orthopedic (n = 107), or cardiovascular (n = 79) surgery

135 latory surgical procedures (general surgery, orthopedic, neurosurgical, gynecologic, and urologic) in

136 raining program, availability of a dedicated orthopedic nursing unit, and existence of operating room

137 review is to discuss recent developments in orthopedic oncology, with special attention given to adv

138 , occurs following mechanical trauma, burns, orthopedic operations, and in patients with hyperactivat

139 ions (SSIs) among patients having cardiac or orthopedic operations.

140 ptember 2012 to September 2013 (post-SCM) to Orthopedic or Neurosurgery at our institution.

141 can Society of Anesthesiologists, undergoing orthopedic or spinal procedures, or died prior to discha

142 s who underwent 1 of 7 major cardiovascular, orthopedic, or general surgical operations.

143 lar, thoracic, genitourinary, neurosurgical, orthopedic, or spine surgery from October 1, 1999, throu

144 sis Related Group classification of general, orthopedic, or vascular surgery.

145 sis related group classification of general, orthopedic, or vascular surgery.

146 sis related group classification of general, orthopedic, or vascular surgery.

147 general, gynecological, neurosurgical, oral, orthopedics, otolaryngologic, plastic, podiatric, thorac

148 alty groups: general, urology, neurosurgery, orthopedic, otolaryngology, plastic, thoracic, periphera

149 a significant decline in readmission rates: orthopedic (P = .004), otolaryngology (P = .005), plasti

150 suggest that gentamicin should be avoided in orthopedic patients in the perioperative period.

151 use fibroblasts in a gene therapy study, (2) orthopedic patients with torn anterior cruciate ligament

152 tected in 2/4 synovial biopsy specimens from orthopedic patients with traumatic knee injuries.

153 In orthopedic patients, change in policy from cefuroxime to

154 the United States for thromboprophylaxis in orthopedic patients, was discontinued due to severe hepa

155 and complication rates for both cardiac and orthopedic patients.

156 The addition of two orthopedic pelvic fracture specialists led to a revision

157 d tumor controls (N = 51) were identified by orthopedic physicians, and segments of tumor-adjacent bo

158 eatres in 5 UK hospitals performing elective orthopedic, plastic, or vascular surgery PARTICIPANTS::

159 Data were analyzed for orthopedics, podiatry, and rheumatology, and data were d

160 and %EWL and improvement in hypertension and orthopedic problems, although significant, were greater

161 cal issues, asthma, obstructive sleep apnea, orthopedic problems, and adverse cardiovascular and meta

162 f all patients with Down syndrome experience orthopedic problems.

163 4% of patients, with 24% having undergone an orthopedic procedure and an additional 15% considered ca

164 th the gastrointestinal, cardiothoracic, and orthopedic procedure categories, and these were also 3 o

165 otal hip replacement is a commonly performed orthopedic procedure for the treatment of painful arthri

166 as associated with higher SSI occurrence for orthopedic procedures (adjusted OR = 1.75; 95% CI, 1.16-

167 nt elective general surgical, urological, or orthopedic procedures (N = 211,202).

168 Of the cases, 180 (35%) followed orthopedic procedures and 334 (65%) followed colon or th

169 General surgical, gynecologic, and orthopedic procedures composed 95.8% of inpatient cases

170 h an accompanying increase in admissions for orthopedic procedures or other surgery; expanded indicat

171 id endarterectomy, other cancer surgery, and orthopedic procedures was of much smaller magnitude.

172 rtial meniscectomy is one of the most common orthopedic procedures, yet rigorous evidence of its effi

173 ctions were documented following 36 elective orthopedic procedures.

174 ccessfully integrated into rheumatologic and orthopedic procedures.

175 ecrosis factor inhibitors frequently undergo orthopedic procedures.

176 with advanced knee osteoarthritis and after orthopedic procedures.

177 greater for those with inhibitors or recent orthopedic procedures.

178 or status, body mass index (BMI), and recent orthopedic procedures.

179 MRSA) screening prior to elective cardiac or orthopedic procedures.

180 nge or retain outer gloves 1 hour into clean orthopedic procedures; cultures were obtained 15 minutes

181 iratory, gastrointestinal, and rheumatologic/orthopedic/psychiatric complex chronic conditions were n

182 nt-specific bone grafts for craniofacial and orthopedic reconstructions.

183 Allografts are commonly used in orthopedic reconstructive surgery.

184 ontraumatic conditions in children for which orthopedic referral is sought.

185 ites were partially successful in increasing orthopedic referrals to consultative care, but otherwise

186 ising potential for future bone, dental, and orthopedic regenerative applications.

187 mising nanotechnology-based route for unique orthopedics-related hMSC treatments.

188 Although a mainstay of treatment is orthopedic repair, a multidisciplinary comanagement appr

189 s are believed to play a fundamental role in orthopedic research because bone itself has a structural

190 ssue regeneration represent a major focus of orthopedic research.

191 responses (69%) were obtained from surveyed orthopedic residents between 2003 and 2009.

192 survey from 2003 to 2009 was administered to orthopedic residents in a multi-institutional program, i

193 Orthopedic, rheumatologic, and other subspecialty referr

194 potential for innovative clinical imaging in orthopedics, rheumatology, and oncology.

195 Survival, neurologic outcome, and orthopedic sequelae were evaluated according to age of t

196 Fewer orthopedic sequelae were observed in the children manage

197 and the opinion of specialists in pediatric orthopedics specifically in the areas of foot and ankle,

198 ptional Student Education placement owing to orthopedic, speech, or sensory impairment or being hospi

199 Opioid use was studied in 230 orthopedics spine clinic patients by retrospective analy

200 therapy in a large cohort of patients in an orthopedics spine clinic.

201 Orthopedic strain and radiation exposure are recognized

202 92% versus 85%), to receive a referral to an orthopedic surgeon (18% versus 13%), and for those with

203 The orthopedic surgeon and three radiologists reviewed arthr

204 of this review is to update the role of the orthopedic surgeon in the management of Down syndrome as

205 ge range, 7 months to 13 years 6 months), an orthopedic surgeon performed intraoperative arthrography

206 the evaluation of a needle-stick injury, an orthopedic surgeon was found to be unknowingly infected

207 tabular cartilage damage was performed by an orthopedic surgeon who was blinded to the results of T2*

208 n with their primary care provider or saw an orthopedic surgeon within 12 months of the intervention.

209 /or a recommendation for TKR surgery from an orthopedic surgeon within 6 months after the interventio

210 ians, including the pediatric oncologist and orthopedic surgeon, to ensure prompt diagnosis and treat

211 Orthopedic surgeons and nurses preferred the hospitalist

212 ogists, internists, gastroenterologists, and orthopedic surgeons currently manage patients who receiv

213 primary care sports medicine physicians, and orthopedic surgeons have provided clinical care for CAHA

214 Until that time, however, the role of orthopedic surgeons in treating patients with muscular d

215 compared with standard postoperative care by orthopedic surgeons with medical consultation.

216 General surgeons, orthopedic surgeons, anesthesiologists, and critical car

217 A multidisciplinary team including the orthopedic surgeons, frontline staff, and executive mana

218 d for use by infectious disease specialists, orthopedic surgeons, neurosurgeons, radiologists, and ot

219 ocedures but not obstetrician-gynecologists, orthopedic surgeons, or neurologists.

220 itis Foundation, and the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons.

221 ed to diagnostic arthroscopy by most leading orthopedic surgeons.

222 n occurred after 6.2% of surgeries (1.6% for orthopedic surgeries to 11.3% for colorectal surgeries).

223 Orthopedic surgery administrators from hospitals caring

224 0 (95% CI, 0.54-0.91) in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery and 0.51 (95% CI, 0.28-0.95) in patie

225 the oral anticoagulants in VTE prevention in orthopedic surgery and comparison with large observation

226 Our study could open new avenues in orthopedic surgery and enhance treatment for patients wi

227 evention of thromboembolisms associated with orthopedic surgery and stroke prevention in atrial fibri

228 ent data on inpatient general, vascular, and orthopedic surgery from 2008 to 2014 were merged with la

229 ram data on inpatient general, vascular, and orthopedic surgery from 2008 to 2014 were merged with la

230 However, bone malformation in orthopedic surgery is a lingering issue, partly due to t

231 l duration of thromboprophylaxis after major orthopedic surgery is unclear.

232 program, fewer TKRs conducted in a dedicated orthopedic surgery operating room, patient age >70 years

233 Orthopedic surgery patients are vulnerable to a number o

234 Orthopedic surgery patients represent a significant and

235 the current literature regarding the care of orthopedic surgery patients was performed.

236 ct HBOC-201 (Hemopure) has been completed in orthopedic surgery patients.

237 at may improve the outcome of critically ill orthopedic surgery patients.

238 factors were associated with VTE in 32 older orthopedic surgery patients.

239 a renal transplantation, undergoing elective orthopedic surgery requiring a small-volume bone graft.

240 Four patients undergoing elective orthopedic surgery served as controls.

241 CI, 0.91-1.61), for thromboprophylaxis after orthopedic surgery the OR was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.31-1.96),

242 We documented HBV transmission during orthopedic surgery to 2 patients from a surgeon with HBV

243 cording to major surgery type from 86.0% for orthopedic surgery to 53.8% in urologic/gynecologic and

244 Major orthopedic surgery was most strongly associated with pro

245 ped a range of anti-HLA antibodies following orthopedic surgery where a bone graft was deployed intra

246 526 patients having elective orthopedic surgery who are at elevated risk for postoper

247 ion strategy for SSIs in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery with hardware implantation and warran

248 ive database of patients undergoing elective orthopedic surgery with hardware implantation at the Mic

249 than 50% among patients undergoing elective orthopedic surgery with hardware implantation.

250 al medicine); performance of spinal surgery (orthopedic surgery) or abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

251 ctive gastrointestinal surgery and emergency orthopedic surgery).

252 al specialties: 101348 procedures (42.8%) in orthopedic surgery, 92808 procedures (39.2%) in general

253 ause family medicine, obstetrics-gynecology, orthopedic surgery, and neurology specialists are often

254 ology, physical medicine and rehabilitation, orthopedic surgery, and nonoperative sports medicine.

255 appropriateness predicted future referral to orthopedic surgery, and not race or TJA-specific health

256 subspecialties of dermatology, neurosurgery, orthopedic surgery, and urology ranged from $954 to $698

257 g/dL is recommended for patients undergoing orthopedic surgery, cardiac surgery, and those with pree

258 eurosurgery, followed by patients undergoing orthopedic surgery, general surgery, peripheral vascular

259 f physicians specializing in anesthesiology, orthopedic surgery, neurosurgery, radiology, cardiovascu

260 For orthopedic surgery, no significant mortality reduction w

261 physicians in general surgery, neurosurgery, orthopedic surgery, obstetrics/gynecology, emergency med

262 prior venous thrombosis (<1 year), venous or orthopedic surgery, or vascular malformations were clini

263 o be performed because of weight limits (ie, orthopedic surgery, organ transplantation).

264 tion participants were attending surgeons in orthopedic surgery, otolaryngology-head and neck surgery

265 ice, obstetrics/gynecology, general surgery, orthopedic surgery, psychiatry, and anesthesiology) at a

266 Similarly, with improvements in orthopedic surgery, the results of hip arthroplasty have

267 Regarding patients who underwent orthopedic surgery, the risk was not different between N

268 ness analyses of VTE treatments conducted in orthopedic surgery, trauma, general surgery, and acute m

269 ada for venous thromboembolism prevention in orthopedic surgery, with US Food and Drug Administration

270 me resistant to steroid therapy 1 week after orthopedic surgery.

271 for prophylaxis in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery.

272 likely to be referred by their physicians to orthopedic surgery.

273 ] 1.15-3.32; P = 0.01) predicted referral to orthopedic surgery.

274 venous thromboembolism prevention following orthopedic surgery.

275 efficacious alternative in VTE prevention in orthopedic surgery.

276 inical appropriateness of TJA on referral to orthopedic surgery.

277 rgery and 1523 patients undergoing emergency orthopedic surgery.

278 at may limit further expansion of outpatient orthopedic surgery.

279 5 and 85 years of age undergoing general and orthopedic surgery.

280 stetrics and gynecology, otolaryngology, and orthopedic surgery.

281 s in adults undergoing cardiac, vascular, or orthopedic surgery.

282 ndous growth in the number and complexity of orthopedic surgical procedures performed on an outpatien

283 ve studies over the past year that evaluated orthopedic surgical techniques for the treatment of arth

284 A comanagement medical Hospitalist-Orthopedic Team compared with standard postoperative car

285 The comanagement medical Hospitalist-Orthopedic Team model reduced minor postoperative compli

286 model of hematogenous infection in which an orthopedic titanium implant was surgically placed in the

287 y patients, referring patients directly from orthopedics to an osteoporosis care program, organizing

288 mediate emergency department presence of the orthopedic trauma attending to provide joint decision ma

289 diatric musculoskeletal system and pediatric orthopedic trauma management in general and as they appl

290 The principles of pediatric orthopedic trauma management include anticipating future

291 Optimal management of pediatric orthopedic trauma requires understanding the unique char

292 decision making between trauma surgeons and orthopedic traumatologists, has resulted in improved pat

293 essing the impact of orthodontic/dentofacial orthopedic treatment on periodontal tissues (i.e., alveo

294 To further our knowledge about the effect of orthopedic treatment on the TMJ, it is necessary that we

295 gery over an 8-year period at a single large orthopedic unit in Northern Ireland.

296 comprised 12,482 adults undergoing surgery (orthopedic, urology, vascular, gastrointestinal, and gyn

297 similar across departments (general surgery, orthopedics, urology, etc), race, or age.

298 ory of delirium and underwent elective major orthopedic, vascular, or abdominal surgical procedures w

299 protective effects of OPG transgene against orthopedic wear debris-induced bone loss in a murine mod

300 medicine, internal medicine, cardiology, and orthopedics who were observed for 430 hours, 21 of whom