ライフサイエンスコーパス: leafy

1 on of the floral meristem-identity gene LFY (LEAFY).

2 on of SINGLE LEAFLET1 (SGL1), an ortholog of LEAFY.

3 ivation of the floral meristem-identity gene LEAFY.

4 loral identity, such as the Arabidopsis gene LEAFY.

5 s primarily the transcriptional induction of LEAFY.

6 nteractions between flowering-time genes and LEAFY.

7 this is paralleled by rapid upregulation of LEAFY.

8 FT and impairing activation of APETALA1 and LEAFY.

9 ulation and floral fate synergistically with LEAFY.

10 tables were grouped into green-leafy and non-leafy.

11 y and genes that affect flowering time (35S::LEAFY, 35S::APETALA1, terminal flower1), gibberellin pro

12 ns on flowering correlate with expression of LEAFY, a floral meristem identity gene.

13 On the basis of our observation that LEAFY activates different homeotic genes through distinc

14 lin catabolism gene; consequently, increased LEAFY activity causes reduced gibberellin levels.

15 at least partly controlled by the levels of LEAFY activity that are prevalent at a given time of the

16 genes that affects primarily the response to LEAFY activity, and another class of genes that affects

17 vations contrast with previous findings that LEAFY acts as a direct activator of floral homeotic gene

18 The Arabidopsis transcription factor LEAFY acts upstream of homeotic genes such as AGAMOUS to

19 nuous red- or far-red-enriched light induced LEAFY and AGAMOUS-LIKE8 expression within 4 hours.

20 is involved as well as the floral regulators LEAFY and AGAMOUS.

21 tivity of the floral meristem identity genes LEAFY and APETALA 1 is not directly inhibited by TERMINA

22 correlated with the floral-regulatory genes, LEAFY and APETALA1, RNA levels.

23 types of two floral meristem identity genes, LEAFY and APETALA1.

24 ng the competence of the shoot to respond to LEAFY and APETALA1.

25 n varieties of samples classified as fruits, leafy and fruity vegetables, tubers, legumes and cereals

26 t whether the known regulatory links between LEAFY and its MADS-box gene targets, central to flower d

27 (p>0.1) in xanthophyll content between fresh leafy and non-leafy samples.

28 Thirteen vegetables were grouped into green-leafy and non-leafy.

29 PRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS1-1 and LEAFY and the timely development of the wheat spike.

30 e SAM, leading to activation of APETALA1 and LEAFY and thereby promoting floral meristem identity.

31 and surprisingly, some of these factors are LEAFY and UNUSUAL FLORAL ORGANS.

32 domain is, in part, specified redundantly by LEAFY and UNUSUAL FLORAL ORGANS.

33 carpel development by STM is independent of LEAFY and WUSCHEL, but requires the function of AGAMOUS.

34 QUAMOSA PROMOTER-BINDING PROTEIN LIKE genes, LEAFY, and APETALA1.

35 s SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS1, LEAFY, and FRUITFUL.

36 directly bind to the promoters of APETALA1, LEAFY, and FRUITFULL, thus mediating their activation by

37 be involved in the GA-promoted activation of LEAFY, and in the regulation of anther development.

38 am target genes, including TERMINAL FLOWER1, LEAFY, and MADS box homologs, and to facilitate cross-re

39 Meristem identity genes, such as LEAFY, APETALA 1 and CAULIFLOWER, prevent TERMINAL FLOWE

40 The phenotype of hasty is not suppressed by leafy, apetala1 and agamous, demonstrating that this phe

41 The expression of the floral regulators LEAFY, APETALA1 and AGAMOUS-LIKE8 was examined during li

42 g mutations also suppress bract formation in leafy, apetala1 and apetala2 mutant backgrounds.

43 perception (gai), and floral morphogenesis (leafy, apetala1, agamous).

44 tion factors without gene duplication, using LEAFY as an archetype.

45 indicating an inhibition of EMF activity by LEAFY, as was deduced from double mutant analysis.

46 s) in tobacco and edible plants (spinach and leafy beets) at costs that will allow commercialization.

47 thin floral tissues, but that changes in the leafy bracts and nonbolt leaves as the plant shifts from

48 ssion of one of the meristem-identity genes, LEAFY, can cause the precocious generation of flowers an

49 tiation, as further supported by the loss of leafy carpelloid features in stm leafy double mutants.

50 Thus, LEAFY combines properties of flowering-time and flower-m

51 embryos share many characteristics with the leafy cotyledon (lec) class of mutants in that they accu

52 gulators of seed development and include the LEAFY COTYLEDON (LEC) genes LEC1, LEC1-LIKE, LEC2, and F

53 transcription factor that is a member of the LEAFY COTYLEDON (LEC) group of genes.

54 etwork of transcription factors that include LEAFY COTYLEDON 1 (LEC1), LEC1-LIKE (L1L), and B3 domain

55 of the embryo development master regulators LEAFY COTYLEDON 1 and 2, FUSCA 3, and ABSCICIC ACID INSE

56 Knockout of GLABRA2 did not affect LEAFY COTYLEDON 1 and PICKLE expression in developing em

57 C1), LEC1-LIKE (L1L), and B3 domain factors, LEAFY COTYLEDON 2 (LEC2), FUSCA3 (FUS3), and ABSCISIC AC

58 arrying a lesion in the transcription factor LEAFY COTYLEDON 2 (LEC2; At1g28300).

59 e that PKL acts as a master regulator of the LEAFY COTYLEDON genes, and that joint derepression of th

60 Transcripts for all three LEAFY COTYLEDON genes, LEC1, LEC2, and FUS3, exhibit PKL

61 sed on genome scale searches for homologs of LEAFY COTYLEDON-LIKE (L1L; AtNF-YB6), NF-YB transcriptio

62 The BABY BOOM (BBM) and LEAFY COTYLEDON1 (LEC1) and LEC2 transcription factors a

63 genes encoding auxin response factor (ARF ), Leafy cotyledon1 (LEC1) and somatic embryogenesis recept

64 The Arabidopsis LEAFY COTYLEDON1 (LEC1) gene is required for the specifi

65 LEAFY COTYLEDON1 (LEC1) is a central regulator that is r

66 Arabidopsis LEAFY COTYLEDON1 (LEC1) is a critical regulator required

67 ecessary for the repression of expression of LEAFY COTYLEDON1 (LEC1), a central regulator of embryoge

68 LEAFY COTYLEDON1 (LEC1), an atypical subunit of the nucl

69 oil content, which involve WRINKLED1 (WRI1), LEAFY COTYLEDON1 (LEC1), and LEC2 in Arabidopsis, have b

70 t it represents a gain-of-function mutant of LEAFY COTYLEDON1 (LEC1), due to a promoter mutation.

71 By screening mutants in leafy cotyledon1 (LEC1)-inducible transcription factors

72 is are initiated by the transcription factor LEAFY COTYLEDON1 (LEC1).

73 port that overexpression of maize (Zea mays) LEAFY COTYLEDON1 (ZmLEC1) increases seed oil by as much

74 n particular, we find that PKL is present at LEAFY COTYLEDON1 and LEAFY COTYLEDON2 during germination

75 uding those encoded by the Arabidopsis LEC1 (LEAFY COTYLEDON1), FUS3 (FUSCA3), and abscisic acid-inse

76 The Arabidopsis LEAFY COTYLEDON2 (LEC2) gene is a central embryonic regu

77 WOUND INDUCED DEDIFFERENTIATION3 (WIND3) and LEAFY COTYLEDON2 (LEC2) genes are among the PRC2 targets

78 LEAFY COTYLEDON2 (LEC2) is a central regulator of embryo

79 LEAFY COTYLEDON2 (LEC2) is among a small number of key t

80 The B3 domain protein LEAFY COTYLEDON2 (LEC2) is required for several aspects

81 related regulators with a B3 domain, namely LEAFY COTYLEDON2 (LEC2), ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE3 (ABI

82 ACID-INSENSITIVE3 (ABI3), FUSCA3 (FUS3), and LEAFY COTYLEDON2 (LEC2; AFL) and VIVIPAROUS1/ABI3-LIKE (

83 in part by repressing the master regulators LEAFY COTYLEDON2 and FUSCA3 and identify the trihelix tr

84 that PKL is present at LEAFY COTYLEDON1 and LEAFY COTYLEDON2 during germination, which is when PKL a

85 LEAFY COTYLEDON2, FUSCA3, and ABA INSENSITIVE3, which en

86 the loss of leafy carpelloid features in stm leafy double mutants.

87 We have analyzed in detail the expression of LEAFY during the plant life cycle, and found that LEAFY

88 which contests their model and supports that LEAFY evolves through duplications.

89 history of plants and ignores evidence that LEAFY evolves through gene duplications.

90 kers, the rbcL barcoding marker (cpDNA), the LEAFY exon 3 (nrDNA), and the trnL((UAA)) P6 loop (cpDNA

91 Changes in LEAFY expression before the transition to flowering sugg

92 n short days, enhances the gradual change in LEAFY expression observed in short days.

93 in biosynthesis caused merely a reduction of LEAFY expression when plants were grown in long days or

94 the floral meristem identity gene FLORICAULA/LEAFY (FLO/LFY) affect flower development alone, whereas

95 TMERISTEMLESS (STM), PHANTASTICA (PHAN), and LEAFY/FLORICAULA (LFY/FLO) during leaf development was a

96 MADS box transcription factors, resulting in leafy flower formation.

97 HYL1 gene of PnWB (PHYL1 plants), which show leafy flower phenotypes, up-regulate SVP of Arabidopsis

98 Leafy flowers are the major symptoms of peanut witches'

99 aric acids were isolated and quantified in a leafy food matrix.

100 (LG3) domain had a milder effect, perturbing leafy gametophore patterning and archegonia development.

101 change from young filamentous protonemata to leafy gametophores in the moss Physcomitrella patens, op

102 and results in filamentous colonies lacking leafy gametophores.

103 The LEAFY gene is an important element of the transition fro

104 ory loop involving the WUSCHEL, AGAMOUS, and LEAFY genes controls the switch from continuous meristem

105 t, suppressor of overexpression of CO1, and leafy, genes regulating anther and pistil development, a

106 Leafy green produce has been associated with numerous ou

107 ions is most relevant for E. coli O157:H7 on leafy green produce, we developed and applied a propidiu

108 affected the survival of E. coli O157:H7 in leafy green producing soils and the development of good

109 to stone fruit, caramel apples, and packaged leafy green salad contaminated with Listeria monocytogen

110 tection against methylation was observed for leafy green vegetables [odds ratio (OR) = 0.83 per 12 mo

111 The quality of leafy green vegetables changes during storage.

112 usly unreported metabolite associations with leafy green vegetables, sugar-sweetened beverages, citru

113 present in especially high concentrations in leafy green vegetables.

114 on of polyphenols and carotenoids present in leafy greens.

115 Here we show that the meristem-identity gene LEAFY has a role in controlling homeotic genes that is s

116 dopsis thaliana, the floral identity protein LEAFY has strong non-autonomous effects when expressed i

117 inductive signals are integrated upstream of LEAFY Here we show that gibberellins activate the LEAFY

118 Previous experiments with leafy heterozygous plants and agamous mutants grown in c

119 mutants suggests that these maize FLORICAULA/LEAFY homologs act as upstream regulators of the ABC flo

120 While roles for FLORICAULA/LEAFY homologs in flower development have been demonstra

121 stigate the role of two duplicate FLORICAULA/LEAFY homologs in maize (Zea mays L. ssp. mays) - a mono

122 , we examine expression of the SEP-like gene LEAFY HULL STERILE1 (LHS1) in phylogenetically disparate

123 leafy hull sterile1/OsMADS1, from a grass-specific subgr

124 Constitutive expression of LEAFY in weak emf1, but not emf2, mutants increased the

125 on of floral meristem-identity genes such as LEAFY, indicating that floral inductive signals are inte

126 ercome this effect, the transcription factor LEAFY induces expression of a gibberellin catabolism gen

127 wer-meristem-identity genes, indicating that LEAFY is a direct link between the global process of flo

128 Thus, LEAFY is a direct upstream regulator of floral homeotic

129 the vegetative to the reproductive phase, as LEAFY is both necessary and sufficient for the initiatio

130 othesis that the transcriptional activity of LEAFY is dependent on specific co-regulators.

131 tly of AGAMOUS, and that the primary role of LEAFY is either direct repression of shoot identity gene

132 during the plant life cycle, and found that LEAFY is extensively expressed during the vegetative pha

133 We identified leafy (lfy) and apetala1 (ap1) alleles in a mutant scree

134 LEAFY (LFY) and APETALA1 (AP1) are pivotal for the switc

135 show that the floral meristem identity genes LEAFY (LFY) and APETALA1 (AP1) are required for the acti

136 LEAFY (LFY) and APETALA1 (AP1) encode unrelated transcri

137 n the partially overlapping functions of the LEAFY (LFY) and APETALA1 (AP1) genes, which promote init

138 y in young flowers whereas the expression of LEAFY (LFY) and APETALA1 (AP1) is not substantially affe

139 Floral meristem identity genes LEAFY (LFY) and APETALA1 (AP1) promote establishment and

140 The transcription factors LEAFY (LFY) and APETALA1 (AP1), together with the AP1 pa

141 PTLF, the Populus trichocarpa homolog of LEAFY (LFY) and FLORICAULA, was cloned to assess its fun

142 tors of class B and class C gene expression, LEAFY (LFY) and SEPALLATA3 (SEP3).

143 ession of the floral meristem-identity genes LEAFY (LFY) and SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS

144 ERMINAL FLOWER 1 (TFL1), APETALA 1 (AP1) and LEAFY (LFY) and the floral repression gene EMBRYONIC FLO

145 I expression are positively regulated by the LEAFY (LFY) and UNUSUAL FLORAL ORGANS (UFO) genes.

146 hologs of the flower meristem identity genes LEAFY (LFY) and UNUSUAL FLORAL ORGANS (UFO) in Gerbera h

147 nding sites for two direct activators of AG, LEAFY (LFY) and WUSCHEL (WUS), along with other putative

148 ption factor and meristem identity regulator LEAFY (LFY) controls this developmental transition by in

149 ption factor and meristem identity regulator LEAFY (LFY) controls this switch in Arabidopsis, in part

150 The major floral meristem identity gene LEAFY (LFY) directly activates FD, creating a positive f

151 The plant-specific transcription factor LEAFY (LFY) has central, evolutionarily conserved roles

152 c overexpression of the transcription factor LEAFY (LFY) in callus.

153 The plant-specific transcriptional activator LEAFY (LFY) is a central regulator of the transition to

154 Current models for Arabidopsis state that LEAFY (LFY) is central to the integration of floral sign

155 The plant-specific transcription factor LEAFY (LFY) is necessary and sufficient for this transit

156 enotype that is similar to that seen for the leafy (lfy) mutant.

157 The floral meristem identity gene LEAFY (LFY) of Arabidopsis thaliana is essential for the

158 enetic studies suggest that FLORICAULA (FLO)/LEAFY (LFY) orthologs function to control compound leaf

159 The floral meristem identity gene LEAFY (LFY) plays a role in the initiation phase through

160 DT-A) was expressed under the control of the LEAFY (LFY) promoter.

161 in parallel with the meristem-identity gene LEAFY (LFY) to induce flowering of Arabidopsis, was isol

162 The Arabidopsis LEAFY (LFY) transcription factor is crucial in integrati

163 We show that a binding site for the LEAFY (LFY) transcription factor, present in the AG intr

164 We show that the floral identity protein LEAFY (LFY), a transcription factor expressed throughout

165 LEAFY (LFY), a transcription factor involved in the regu

166 on of CONSTANS (CO), FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT), LEAFY (LFY), and SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTAN

167 ies of at least three genes: APETALA1 (AP1), LEAFY (LFY), and UNUSUAL FLORAL ORGANS (UFO).

168 AGO1 is required for full expression of LEAFY (LFY), APETALA1 (AP1) and AGAMOUS (AG).

169 1 (TFL1), the floral meristem identity genes LEAFY (LFY), APETALA1 (AP1), and CAULIFLOWER (CAL), and

170 tivity of the flower meristem identity genes LEAFY (LFY), APETALA1 (AP1), and CAULIFLOWER.

171 equent activity of the transcription factors LEAFY (LFY), FRUITFULL (FUL), and APETALA1 (AP1).

172 f the floral regulators FLORICAULA (FLO) and LEAFY (LFY), in place of KNOX1 genes to regulate compoun

173 vely regulated by the meristem-identity gene LEAFY (LFY), which is expressed ubiquitously in young fl

174 code known regulators of flower development: LEAFY (LFY), which specifies floral fate, and two AINTEG

175 of the key regulators of this transition is LEAFY (LFY), whose threshold levels of activity are prop

176 ontrolled by the meristem identity regulator LEAFY (LFY).

177 ncluding FRUITFULL (FUL), APETALA1 (AP1) and LEAFY (LFY).

178 mplex and the flower meristem identity gene, LEAFY (LFY).

179 We found that WelLFY, one of two LEAFY-like genes in Welwitschia, could be an upstream re

180 The seed plants and simple leafy liverworts each independently derived a low level

181 Here, we present evidence that LEAFY maintains floral meristem identity independently o

182 scribed as the strong green-grassy and green-leafy odour, respectively.

183 iption factors FLORICAULA of Antirrhinum and LEAFY of Arabidopsis share conserved roles in flower mer

184 y preventing the meristem from responding to LEAFY or APETALA 1.

185 e regulatory genes, the duplicate FLORICAULA/LEAFY orthologs zfl1 and zfl2.

186 data set, we identified a moss with multiple LEAFY orthologs, which contests their model and supports

187 henotypes seen in late-flowering mutants and LEAFY overexpressers to clarify the genetic interactions

188 nts that overexpress a closely related gene, LEAFY PETIOLE (LEP).

189 we have developed a rapid in vitro assay for LEAFY promoter activity.

190 short days was paralleled by the absence of LEAFY promoter induction.

191 e daylength response, demonstrating that the LEAFY promoter integrates environmental and endogenous s

192 Here we show that gibberellins activate the LEAFY promoter through cis elements that are different f

193 The LEAFY protein, which is expressed throughout the flower,

194 Analysis of a LEAFY-responsive enhancer in the homeotic gene AGAMOUS i

195 thophyll content between fresh leafy and non-leafy samples.

196 Using a low-copy nuclear gene region (LEAFY second intron) we show multiple instances of allop

197 al. propose that the identification of novel LEAFY sequences contradicts our model of evolution throu

198 ion of PpRSL1 and PpRSL2 converts developing leafy shoot axes (gametophores) into rhizoids.

199 r rooting (stigmarian) systems were modified leafy shoot systems, distinct from the roots of all othe

200 A simple model co-ordinating the activity of leafy shoot tips can account for branching patterns, and

201 Leafy shoots formed on DeltaTEL1 mutants exhibit shorter

202 otype in which plants continuously elaborate leafy shoots in place of flowers.

203 brk1 phenotypes in protonema are severe, the leafy shoots or gametophores are normally shaped but stu

204 brane-targeted PIN proteins are expressed in leafy shoots, and pin mutants resemble plants treated wi

205 a complete homeotic conversion of flowers to leafy shoots, mimicking lfy ap1 double mutants in A. tha

206 h approximately one-third those measured for leafy shoots.

207 Leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.) is a deep-rooted peren

208 Leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.) is an herbaceous peren

209 Leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) is a perennial weed which

210 Leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) is an herbaceous perennia

211 Underground adventitious buds of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) undergo three well-define

212 e genes as markers to follow this process in leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula).

213 Leafy spurge DAM genes are preferentially expressed in s

214 global transcriptome data-sets obtained from leafy spurge exposed to a ramp down in both temperature

215 ed germination and vegetative propagation, a leafy spurge gene (Accession No.

216 ee different sources: (1) 3 stably expressed leafy spurge genes (60S, bZIP21, and MD-100) identified

217 , while ORE9 and ARF2 were selected from 171 leafy spurge genes, it was more efficient to identify go

218 Nevertheless, the two newly identified leafy spurge genes, ORE9 and ARF2, can serve as ortholog

219 nsus, cis-acting elements in the promoter of leafy spurge genomic clones similar to Arabidopsis RVE1

220 of the DAM gene promoters between poplar and leafy spurge have identified several conserved sequences

221 Leafy spurge is a model for studying well-defined phases

222 growth from underground adventitious buds of leafy spurge is critical for survival of this invasive p

223 and MD-100) identified from the analyses of leafy spurge microarray data; (2) 3 orthologs of Arabido

224 Leafy spurge seeds do not germinate when incubated for 2

225 buds of the model herbaceous perennial weed leafy spurge were investigated using a 23 K element cDNA

226 ed transcriptome changes in Euphorbia esula (leafy spurge) seeds with a focus on the effect of consta

227 s associated with vegetative reproduction of leafy spurge, greenhouse plants were exposed to mild- (3

228 or the transition to endodormancy in UABs of leafy spurge, which strengthened the roles of circadian

229 titious underground bud, and other organs of leafy spurge.

230 MADS box genes from the model perennial weed leafy spurge.

231 tiation of shoot growth (forward library) in leafy spurge.

232 ar markers for endodormancy in crown buds of leafy spurge.

233 ition from para- to endo-dormancy in UABs of leafy spurge.

234 rabidopsis, but were most abundant in green, leafy tissues.

235 reased levels of miR159 cause a reduction in LEAFY transcript levels, delay flowering in short-day ph

236 by the ability of a constitutively expressed LEAFY transgene to restore flowering to ga1-3 mutants in

237 r further uptake is varying depending on the leafy type.

238 ing leaf morphogenesis and together with the LEAFY/UNIFOLIATA orthologue plays an important role in o

239 egulates the expression of the M. truncatula LEAFY/UNIFOLIATA orthologue SINGLE LEAFLET1 (SGL1), enco

240 moter regions of APETALA1 and 3, SEPALLATA3, LEAFY, UNUSUAL FLORAL ORGANS, TERMINAL FLOWER1, AGAMOUS-

241 racea L.) is an economically important green leafy vegetable crop.

242 Spinach is an important leafy vegetable enriched with multiple necessary nutrien

243 Higher dietary nitrate and green leafy vegetable intake was associated with a lower POAG

244 Green leafy vegetable intake was more strongly associated with

245 Po activity concentration follows the trend: leafy vegetable>flour>rice>fruits>pasta>other vegetables

246 ettuce (Lactuca sativa L.), the most popular leafy vegetable, are susceptible to downy mildew disease

247 Lettuce is an important leafy vegetable, consumed across the world, containing b

248 The nutritional composition of ten leafy vegetables (chicory, green lettuce, lamb's lettuce

249 commonly consumed cereals, pulses and green leafy vegetables (GLV) was determined.

250 aflatoxin (AF) in agricultural soils, green leafy vegetables (GLVs) and persistence in processed foo

251 gestion method in 20 commonly consumed green leafy vegetables (GLVs) from the typical Indian diet, pr

252 % CI: 0.35, 0.95; P for trend = 0.04), green leafy vegetables (OR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.36, 0.96; P for tr

253 For current smokers, green leafy vegetables (ptrend = 0.05) and beta-carotene-rich

254 Green leafy vegetables (relative risk with 1-serving/d increas

255 1 serving per day; 95% CI, 0.49-0.94), green leafy vegetables (RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.62-0.99), citrus f

256 (mainly beta-carotene) from yellow and green leafy vegetables [carrots, pechay (bok choy), squash, an

257 Green leafy vegetables accounted for 56.7% of nitrate intake v

258 Women consuming the most green leafy vegetables also experienced slower decline than wo

259 Dietary nitrate, abundant in green leafy vegetables and beetroot, can increase NO bioactivi

260 Dietary nitrate, which is in green leafy vegetables and beetroot, decreases blood pressure

261 egetables-particularly cruciferous and green leafy vegetables and citrus fruit and juice-and ischemic

262 trations of nitrates were registered in some leafy vegetables and mussels samples, while high nitrite

263 of fruits and vegetables, particularly green leafy vegetables and vitamin C-rich fruits and vegetable

264 Dark green leafy vegetables are primary food sources for lutein and

265 85 samples of meat, dairy, fish products and leafy vegetables are reported.

266 Green-leafy vegetables are rich in nutritionally important con

267 d tatsoi) and quality traits of the selected leafy vegetables in relation to the light intensity (low

268 potent source of macular pigments than green leafy vegetables like spinach.

269 findings suggest that higher intake of green leafy vegetables may reduce the risk of cardiovascular d

270 Daily consumption of cooked, pureed green leafy vegetables or sweet potatoes has a positive effect

271 g for potential confounders, intake of green leafy vegetables was positively associated with normaliz

272 ruit and vegetables, citrus fruit, and green leafy vegetables were 0.61 (0.43, 0.86), 0.64 (0.46, 0.8

273 Among subgroups of vegetables, green leafy vegetables were associated with a lower risk of co

274 When leafy vegetables were harvested at low as opposed to hig

275 nd zeaxanthin are carotenoids found in green leafy vegetables with interesting antioxidant properties

276 tochemicals and antioxidant activities in 25 leafy vegetables with two common boiling practices viz.,

277 attern (whole grains, fruit, nuts, and green leafy vegetables) was inversely associated with CRP, IL-

278 No associations were observed for green leafy vegetables, 8 botanical groups, and 17 specific fr

279 l practice of eating staples with dark-green leafy vegetables, and 2 study groups, who were given eit

280 A higher consumption of citrus fruit, green leafy vegetables, and beta-carotene- and vitamin C-rich

281 getables, total fruits and vegetables, green leafy vegetables, and several botanically and phytochemi

282 meat, and margarine, and low intake of green leafy vegetables, cruciferous vegetables, and coffee may

283 The method was tested in different green leafy vegetables, evidencing diverse tocochromanol profi

284 tervention was a daily snack made from green leafy vegetables, fruit, and milk (treatment group) or l

285 A daily snack providing additional green leafy vegetables, fruit, and milk before conception and

286 in lutein and zeaxanthin, such as dark-green leafy vegetables, or by supplementation with lutein or z

287 Carotene-rich yellow and green leafy vegetables, when ingested with minimal fat, enhanc

288 hod for quantification of vitamin E in green leafy vegetables.

289 h consisted largely of squashes and root and leafy vegetables.

290 ed lettuce were higher compared to the other leafy vegetables.

291 in roots and tubers, but 0.155 mg kg(-1) in leafy vegetables.

292 gumes, soy-based foods, rice, and dark-green leafy vegetables; and a salad and wine diet, high in let

293 e inverse association was stronger for green leafy vegetables; in multivariate analysis, persons cons

294 was characterized by high intakes of green, leafy vegetables; salad dressings; tomatoes; other veget

295 Green leafy volatiles (GLV), six-carbon aldehydes, alcohols, a

296 le production of jasmonates (JAs), and green leafy volatiles (GLVs) respectively.

297 s conferred by a gain-of-function transgene, LEAFY:VP16, that appears to act as a dominant negative,

298 PRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS1-1 and LEAFY, whereas inhibition of GA biosynthesis with paclob

299 er action of meristem-identity genes such as LEAFY, which encodes a transcription factor that determi

300 AGAMOUS indicates that direct interaction of LEAFY with this enhancer is required for its activity in