Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Prions as adaptive conduits of memory and inheritance

Key Points

  • Prions are transmissible, self-replicating protein conformations that cause neurodegenerative diseases in mammals, but function as beneficial genetic elements in fungi.

  • The generation of synthetic prions provides definitive support for the prion hypothesis.

  • Beneficial fungal prions are regulated by protein-remodelling factors (such as Hsp104) and molecular chaperones (such as Hsp40).

  • The yeast prion [PSI+] confers evolvability and phenotypic plasticity, which impart selective advantages

  • Prions that mimic loss-of-function mutations might act as evolutionary capacitors.

  • Glutamine (Gln)/asparagine (Asn)-rich domains of yeast prions confer all aspects of prion behaviour, and are broadly distributed in many proteins of plants, fungi and metazoa, indicating that prions might be more common than previously thought.

  • CPEB prions might function in the formation of long-term memory.

  • Prions might also be involved in the construction of transcriptional memory and genome-wide expression patterns.

Abstract

Changes in protein conformation drive most biological processes, but none have seized the imagination of scientists and the public alike as have the self-replicating conformations of prions. Prions transmit lethal neurodegenerative diseases by means of the food chain. However, self-replicating protein conformations can also constitute molecular memories that transmit genetic information. Here, we showcase definitive evidence for the prion hypothesis and discuss examples in which prion-encoded heritable information has been harnessed during evolution to confer selective advantages. We then describe situations in which prion-enciphered events might have essential roles in long-term memory formation, transcriptional memory and genome-wide expression patterns.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The prion hypothesis and the yeast prion [PSI+]
Figure 2: [PSI+] reveals hidden genetic variation and can confer selective advantages.
Figure 3: Maintenance of long-term facilitation by the ApCPEB prion.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. James, L. C. & Tawfik, D. S. Conformational diversity and protein evolution — a 60-year-old hypothesis revisited. Trends Biochem. Sci. 28, 361–368 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Prusiner, S. B. Novel proteinaceous infectious particles cause scrapie. Science 216, 136–144 (1982).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wickner, R. B. [URE3] as an altered URE2 protein: evidence for a prion analog in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 264, 566–569 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Si, K., Lindquist, S. & Kandel, E. R. A neuronal isoform of the Aplysia CPEB has prion-like properties. Cell 115, 879–891 (2003). This paper shows that ApCPEB can function as a prion in yeast, and that the prion conformation is the most active in stimulating translation of CPEB-regulated mRNA. Together with data from reference 99, the authors propose that the formation of ApCPEB prions in specifically stimulated synapses helps to maintain long-term synaptic changes that are associated with memory storage.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Prusiner, S. B. Prion Biology and Diseases (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Uptain, S. M. & Lindquist, S. Prions as protein-based genetic elements. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 56, 703–741 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wickner, R. B., Liebman, S. W. & Saupe, S. J. in Prion Biology and Diseases (ed. Prusiner, S. B.) 305–372 (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press New York, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chien, P., Weissman, J. S. & DePace, A. H. Emerging principles of conformation-based prion inheritance. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 73, 617–656 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Alper, T., Cramp, W. A., Haig, D. A. & Clarke, M. C. Does the agent of scrapie replicate without nucleic acid? Nature 214, 764–766 (1967).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Griffith, J. S. Self-replication and scrapie. Nature 215, 1043–1044 (1967).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Prusiner, S. B. et al. Scrapie prions aggregate to form amyloid-like birefringent rods. Cell 35, 349–358 (1983).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kong, Q. et al. in Prion Biology and Diseases (ed. Prusiner, S. B.) 673–775 (Cold Spring Laboratory Press New York, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bueler, H. et al. Mice devoid of PrP are resistant to scrapie. Cell 73, 1339–1347 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brandner, S. et al. Normal host prion protein necessary for scrapie-induced neurotoxicity. Nature 379, 339–343 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Safar, J. et al. Eight prion strains have PrPSc molecules with different conformations. Nature Med. 4, 1157–1165 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cox, B. S. [PSI], a cytoplasmic suppressor of super-suppression in yeast. Heredity 20, 505–521 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lacroute, F. Non-Mendelian mutation allowing ureidosuccinic acid uptake in yeast. J. Bacteriol. 106, 519–522 (1971).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Sondheimer, N. & Lindquist, S. Rnq1: an epigenetic modifier of protein function in yeast. Mol. Cell 5, 163–172 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Santoso, A., Chien, P., Osherovich, L. Z. & Weissman, J. S. Molecular basis of a yeast prion species barrier. Cell 100, 277–288 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Osherovich, L. Z., Cox, B. S., Tuite, M. F. & Weissman, J. S. Dissection and design of yeast prions. PLoS Biol. 2, E86 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Coustou, V., Deleu, C., Saupe, S. & Begueret, J. The protein product of the het-s heterokaryon incompatibility gene of the fungus Podospora anserina behaves as a prion analog. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 9773–9778 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Baskakov, I. V., Legname, G., Baldwin, M. A., Prusiner, S. B. & Cohen, F. E. Pathway complexity of prion protein assembly into amyloid. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 21140–21148 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Glover, J. R. et al. Self-seeded fibres formed by Sup35, the protein determinant of [PSI+], a heritable prion-like factor of S. cerevisiae. Cell 89, 811–819 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Taylor, K. L., Cheng, N., Williams, R. W., Steven, A. C. & Wickner, R. B. Prion domain initiation of amyloid formation in vitro from native Ure2p. Science 283, 1339–1343 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Maddelein, M. L., Dos Reis, S., Duvezin-Caubet, S., Coulary-Salin, B. & Saupe, S. J. Amyloid aggregates of the HET-s prion protein are infectious. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 7402–7407 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Patino, M. M., Liu, J. J., Glover, J. R. & Lindquist, S. Support for the prion hypothesis for inheritance of a phenotypic trait in yeast. Science 273, 622–626 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Paushkin, S. V., Kushnirov, V. V., Smirnov, V. N. & Ter-Avanesyan, M. D. Propagation of the yeast prion-like [PSI+] determinant is mediated by oligomerization of the SUP35-encoded polypeptide chain release factor. EMBO J. 15, 3127–3134 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Masison, D. C. & Wickner, R. B. Prion-inducing domain of yeast Ure2p and protease resistance of Ure2p in prion-containing cells. Science 270, 93–95 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Balguerie, A. et al. Domain organization and structure-function relationship of the HET-s prion protein of Podospora anserina. EMBO J. 22, 2071–2081 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Speransky, V. V., Taylor, K. L., Edskes, H. K., Wickner, R. B. & Steven, A. C. Prion filament networks in [URE3] cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 153, 1327–1336 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Kimura, Y., Koitabashi, S. & Fujita, T. Analysis of yeast prion aggregates with amyloid-staining compound in vivo. Cell Struct. Funct. 28, 187–193 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kryndushkin, D. S., Alexandrov, I. M., Ter-Avanesyan, M. D. & Kushnirov, V. V. Yeast [PSI+] prion aggregates are formed by small Sup35 polymers fragmented by Hsp104. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 49636–49643 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. King, C. Y. & Diaz-Avalos, R. Protein-only transmission of three yeast prion strains. Nature 428, 319–323 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Serio, T. R. et al. Nucleated conformational conversion and the replication of conformational information by a prion determinant. Science 289, 1317–1321 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Dobson, C. M. Protein folding and misfolding. Nature 426, 884–890 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tanaka, M., Chien, P., Naber, N., Cooke, R. & Weissman, J. S. Conformational variations in an infectious protein determine prion strain differences. Nature 428, 323–328 (2004). References 33 and 36 provide definitive evidence for the yeast prion hypothesis. They establish beyond doubt that [ PSI+] is caused by self-replicating conformers of Sup35, and that distinct, stably propagating Sup35 conformations underpin different [ PSI+] variants.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Legname, G. et al. Synthetic mammalian prions. Science 305, 673–676 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. DePace, A. H. & Weissman, J. S. Origins and kinetic consequences of diversity in Sup35 yeast prion fibres. Nature Struct. Biol. 9, 389–396 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Baxa, U., Speransky, V., Steven, A. C. & Wickner, R. B. Mechanism of inactivation on prion conversion of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ure2 protein. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 5253–5260 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Fink, G. R. A transforming principle. Cell 120, 153–154 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kaneko, K. et al. A synthetic peptide initiates Gerstmann-Straussler-Scheinker (GSS) disease in transgenic mice. J. Mol. Biol. 295, 997–1007 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Legname, G. et al. Strain-specified characteristics of mouse synthetic prions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 2168–2173 (2005). References 37, 41 and 42 provide the initial foundations of definitive evidence for the mammalian prion hypothesis.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Edskes, H. K. & Wickner, R. B. Transmissible spongiform encephalopathies: prion proof in progress. Nature 430, 977–979 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Goudsmit, J. et al. Evidence for and against the transmissibility of Alzheimer disease. Neurology 30, 945–950 (1980).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. West, M. W. et al. De novo amyloid proteins from designed combinatorial libraries. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 11211–11216 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Medawar, P. B. An Unsolved Problem of Biology (H. K. Lewis, London, 1952).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Chernoff, Y. O. et al. Evolutionary conservation of prion-forming abilities of the yeast Sup35 protein. Mol. Microbiol. 35, 865–876 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Nakayashiki, T., Ebihara, K., Bannai, H. & Nakamura, Y. Yeast [PSI+] 'prions' that are crosstransmissible and susceptible beyond a species barrier through a quasi-prion state. Mol. Cell 7, 1121–1130 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Baudin-Baillieu, A., Fernandez-Bellot, E., Reine, F., Coissac, E. & Cullin, C. Conservation of the prion properties of Ure2p through evolution. Mol. Biol. Cell 14, 3449–3458 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Jensen, M. A., True, H. L., Chernoff, Y. O. & Lindquist, S. Molecular population genetics and evolution of a prion-like protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 159, 527–535 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Lindquist, S. Mad cows meet psi-chotic yeast: the expansion of the prion hypothesis. Cell 89, 495–498 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Berson, J. F. et al. Proprotein convertase cleavage liberates a fibrillogenic fragment of a resident glycoprotein to initiate melanosome biogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 161, 521–533 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Mackay, J. P. et al. The hydrophobin EAS is largely unstructured in solution and functions by forming amyloid-like structures. Structure 9, 83–91 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Chapman, M. R. et al. Role of Escherichia coli curli operons in directing amyloid fiber formation. Science 295, 851–855 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Kranenburg, O. et al. Tissue-type plasminogen activator is a multiligand cross-β structure receptor. Curr. Biol. 12, 1833–1839 (2002). References 52–55 provide fascinating examples of beneficial amyloid conformers.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Gebbink, M. F., Voest, E. E. & Reijerkerk, A. Do antiangiogenic protein fragments have amyloid properties? Blood 104, 1601–1605 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Nucifora, F. C. Jr. et al. Interference by huntingtin and atrophin-1 with cbp-mediated transcription leading to cellular toxicity. Science 291, 2423–2428 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Kayed, R. et al. Common structure of soluble amyloid oligomers implies common mechanism of pathogenesis. Science 300, 486–489 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Chernoff, Y. O., Lindquist, S. L., Ono, B., Inge-Vechtomov, S. G. & Liebman, S. W. Role of the chaperone protein Hsp104 in propagation of the yeast prion-like factor [PSI+]. Science 268, 880–884 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Moriyama, H., Edskes, H. K. & Wickner, R. B. [URE3] prion propagation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: requirement for chaperone Hsp104 and curing by overexpressed chaperone Ydj1p. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 8916–8922 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Sondheimer, N., Lopez, N., Craig, E. A. & Lindquist, S. The role of Sis1 in the maintenance of the [RNQ+] prion. EMBO J. 20, 2435–2442 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Lopez, N., Aron, R. & Craig, E. A. Specificity of class II Hsp40 Sis1 in maintenance of yeast prion [RNQ+]. Mol. Biol. Cell. 14, 1172–1181 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Mallucci, G. et al. Depleting neuronal PrP in prion infection prevents disease and reverses spongiosis. Science 302, 871–874 (2003). This remarkable paper shows that prion diseases might be treated post infection by downregulating endogenous PrP.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Dorn, G. et al. siRNA relieves chronic neuropathic pain. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, e49 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Xia, H. et al. RNAi suppresses polyglutamine-induced neurodegeneration in a model of spinocerebellar ataxia. Nature Med. 10, 816–820 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Komar, A. A. et al. Internal initiation drives the synthesis of Ure2 protein lacking the prion domain and affects [URE3] propagation in yeast cells. EMBO J. 22, 1199–1209 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. True, H. L. & Lindquist, S. L. A yeast prion provides a mechanism for genetic variation and phenotypic diversity. Nature 407, 477–483 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Uptain, S. M., Sawicki, G. J., Caughey, B. & Lindquist, S. Strains of [PSI+] are distinguished by their efficiencies of prion-mediated conformational conversion. EMBO J. 20, 6236–6245 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Bidou, L. et al. Nonsense-mediated decay mutants do not affect programmed-1 frameshifting. RNA 6, 952–961 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Kellis, M., Patterson, N., Endrizzi, M., Birren, B. & Lander, E. S. Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements. Nature 423, 241–254 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. True, H. L., Berlin, I. & Lindquist, S. L. Epigenetic regulation of translation reveals hidden genetic variation to produce complex traits. Nature 431, 184–187 (2004). Together with reference 67, this paper makes a compelling case for [ PSI+] as a beneficial prion.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Eaglestone, S. S., Cox, B. S. & Tuite, M. F. Translation termination efficiency can be regulated in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by environmental stress through a prion-mediated mechanism. EMBO J. 18, 1974–1981 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Orr, H. A. The population genetics of adaptation: the distribution of factors fixed during adaptive evolution. Evolution 52, 935–949 (1998).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Partridge, L. & Barton, N. H. Evolving evolvability. Nature 407, 457–458 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Brookfield, J. F. Evolution: the evolvability enigma. Curr. Biol. 11, R106–R108 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Kirschner, M. & Gerhart, J. Evolvability. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 8420–8427 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Masel, J. & Bergman, A. The evolution of the evolvability properties of the yeast prion [PSI+]. Evolution Int. J. Org. Evolution 57, 1498–1512 (2003). A convincing modelling study suggesting that [ PSI+] has probably been maintained owing to the evolvability properties that it confers.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Earl, D. J. & Deem, M. W. Evolvability is a selectable trait. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 11531–11536 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Resende, C. G., Outeiro, T. F., Sands, L., Lindquist, S. & Tuite, M. F. Prion protein gene polymorphisms in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Microbiol. 49, 1005–1017 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Lindquist, S. But yeast prion offers clues about evolution. Nature 408, 17–18 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Harrison, P. et al. A small reservoir of disabled ORFs in the yeast genome and its implications for the dynamics of proteome evolution. J. Mol. Biol. 316, 409–419 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Namy, O., Duchateau-Nguyen, G. & Rousset, J. P. Translational readthrough of the PDE2 stop codon modulates cAMP levels in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Microbiol. 43, 641–652 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Dalstra, H. J., Swart, K., Debets, A. J., Saupe, S. J. & Hoekstra, R. F. Sexual transmission of the [Het-s] prion leads to meiotic drive in Podospora anserina. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 6616–6621 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Derkatch, I. L., Bradley, M. E., Zhou, P., Chernoff, Y. O. & Liebman, S. W. Genetic and environmental factors affecting the de novo appearance of the [PSI+] prion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 147, 507–519 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Derkatch, I. L., Bradley, M. E., Hong, J. Y. & Liebman, S. W. Prions affect the appearance of other prions: the story of [PIN+]. Cell 106, 171–182 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Bradley, M. E., Edskes, H. K., Hong, J. Y., Wickner, R. B. & Liebman, S. W. Interactions among prions and prion 'strains' in yeast. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99 (Suppl. 4), 16392–16399 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Salmon, J. M. & Barre, P. Improvement of nitrogen assimilation and fermentation kinetics under enological conditions by derepression of alternative nitrogen-assimilatory pathways in an industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64, 3831–3837 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Crespo, J. L., Daicho, K., Ushimaru, T. & Hall, M. N. The GATA transcription factors GLN3 and GAT1 link TOR to salt stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 34441–34444 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Bergman, A. & Siegal, M. L. Evolutionary capacitance as a general feature of complex gene networks. Nature 424, 549–552 (2003). This remarkable study indicates that many, if not all, genes expose phenotypic variation when functionally compromised, and that the availability of loss-of-function mutations expedites adaptation to new phenotypic optima. Therefore, evolutionary capacitors might be more widespread than previously anticipated.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Hughes, T. R. et al. Functional discovery via a compendium of expression profiles. Cell 102, 109–126 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Sangster, T. A., Lindquist, S. & Queitsch, C. Under cover: causes, effects and implications of Hsp90-mediated genetic capacitance. Bioessays 26, 348–362 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Michelitsch, M. D. & Weissman, J. S. A census of glutamine/asparagine-rich regions: implications for their conserved function and the prediction of novel prions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 11910–11915 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Harrison, P. M. & Gerstein, M. A method to assess compositional bias in biological sequences and its application to prion-like glutamine/asparagine-rich domains in eukaryotic proteomes. Genome Biol. 4, R40 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Flechsig, E. et al. Prion protein devoid of the octapeptide repeat region restores susceptibility to scrapie in PrP knockout mice. Neuron 27, 399–408 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Liu, J. J. & Lindquist, S. Oligopeptide-repeat expansions modulate 'protein-only' inheritance in yeast. Nature 400, 573–576 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Krishnan, R. & Lindquist, S. L. New structural insights on a yeast prion illuminate nucleation and strain diversity. Nature (in the press). This paper defines which regions of the Sup35 prion domain make intermolecular contacts in assembled prion fibres. It also describes how variations in these intermolecular contacts facilitate the construction of different prion variants.

  97. Ross, E. D., Baxa, U. & Wickner, R. B. Scrambled prion domains form prions and amyloid. Mol. Cell Biol. 24, 7206–7213 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Uversky, V. N. & Fink, A. L. Conformational constraints for amyloid fibrillation: the importance of being unfolded. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1698, 131–153 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Si, K. et al. A neuronal isoform of CPEB regulates local protein synthesis and stabilizes synapse-specific long-term facilitation in Aplysia. Cell 115, 893–904 (2003). This paper establishes that neurotransmitter cues upregulate ApCPEB at specific synapses, and that consequent ApCPEB-stimulated translation has a crucial role in the maintenance of synaptic growth associated with long-term facilitation. Together with reference 4, this paper makes a compelling argument that ApCPEB prions function in long-term memory formation.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Bailey, C. H., Kandel, E. R. & Si, K. The persistence of long-term memory: a molecular approach to self-sustaining changes in learning-induced synaptic growth. Neuron 44, 49–57 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Lisman, J., Schulman, H. & Cline, H. The molecular basis of CaMKII function in synaptic and behavioural memory. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 3, 175–190 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Bhalla, U. S. & Iyengar, R. Emergent properties of networks of biological signaling pathways. Science 283, 381–387 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Thayer, M. J. et al. Positive autoregulation of the myogenic determination gene MyoD1. Cell 58, 241–248 (1989).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Way, J. C. & Chalfie, M. The mec-3 gene of Caenorhabditis elegans requires its own product for maintained expression and is expressed in three neuronal cell types. Genes Dev. 3, 1823–1833 (1989).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Mendez, R. & Richter, J. D. Translational control by CPEB: a means to the end. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2, 521–529 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. Uversky, V. N., Gillespie, J. R. & Fink, A. L. Why are 'natively unfolded' proteins unstructured under physiologic conditions? Proteins 41, 415–427 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Sajikumar, S. & Frey, J. U. Late-associativity, synaptic tagging, and the role of dopamine during LTP and LTD. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 82, 12–25 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Theis, M., Si, K. & Kandel, E. R. Two previously undescribed members of the mouse CPEB family of genes and their inducible expression in the principal cell layers of the hippocampus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 9602–9607 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. Li, L. & Lindquist, S. Creating a protein-based element of inheritance. Science 287, 661–664 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Ter-Avanesyan, M. D. et al. Deletion analysis of the SUP35 gene of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals two non-overlapping functional regions in the encoded protein. Mol. Microbiol. 7, 683–692 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Ringrose, L. & Paro, R. Epigenetic regulation of cellular memory by the polycomb and trithorax group proteins. Annu. Rev. Genet. 38, 413–443 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Kim, C. A., Gingery, M., Pilpa, R. M. & Bowie, J. U. The SAM domain of polyhomeotic forms a helical polymer. Nature Struct. Biol. 9, 453–457 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Qiao, F. et al. Derepression by depolymerization; structural insights into the regulation of Yan by Mae. Cell 118, 163–173 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Roberts, C. W. & Orkin, S. H. The SWI/SNF complex — chromatin and cancer. Nature Rev. Cancer 4, 133–142 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Sudarsanam, P., Iyer, V. R., Brown, P. O. & Winston, F. Whole-genome expression analysis of snf/swi mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 3364–3369 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  116. Gilks, N. et al. Stress granule assembly is mediated by prion-like aggregation of TIA-1. Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 5383–5398 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. Roberts, B. T. & Wickner, R. B. Heritable activity: a prion that propagates by covalent autoactivation. Genes Dev. 17, 2083–2087 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  118. Collin, P., Beauregard, P. B., Elagoz, A. & Rokeach, L. A. A non-chromosomal factor allows viability of Schizosaccharomyces pombe lacking the essential chaperone calnexin. J. Cell Sci. 117, 907–918 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Ball, A. J., Wong, D. K. & Elliott, J. J. Glucosamine resistance in yeast. I. A preliminary genetic analysis. Genetics 84, 311–317 (1976).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  120. Silar, P., Haedens, V., Rossignol, M. & Lalucque, H. Propagation of a novel cytoplasmic, infectious and deleterious determinant is controlled by translational accuracy in Podospora anserina. Genetics 151, 87–95 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  121. Talloczy, Z., Menon, S., Neigeborn, L. & Leibowitz, M. J. The [KIL-d] cytoplasmic genetic element of yeast results in epigenetic regulation of viral M double-stranded RNA gene expression. Genetics 150, 21–30 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. Volkov, K. V. et al. Novel non-Mendelian determinant involved in the control of translation accuracy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 160, 25–36 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  123. Derkatch, I. L., Chernoff, Y. O., Kushnirov, V. V., Inge-Vechtomov, S. G. & Liebman, S. W. Genesis and variability of [PSI] prion factors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 144, 1375–1386 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  124. Ter-Avanesyan, M. D., Dagkesamanskaya, A. R., Kushnirov, V. V. & Smirnov, V. N. The SUP35 omnipotent suppressor gene is involved in the maintenance of the non-Mendelian determinant [PSI+] in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 137, 671–676 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  125. Liu, J. J., Sondheimer, N. & Lindquist, S. L. Changes in the middle region of Sup35 profoundly alter the nature of epigenetic inheritance for the yeast prion [PSI+]. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99 (Suppl. 4), 16446–16453 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  126. Bagriantsev, S. & Liebman, S. W. Specificity of prion assembly in vivo. [PSI+] and [PIN+] form separate structures in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 51042–51048 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Schlumpberger, M., Prusiner, S. B. & Herskowitz, I. Induction of distinct [URE3] yeast prion strains. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 7035–7046 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  128. Osherovich, L. Z. & Weissman, J. S. Multiple Gln/Asn-rich prion domains confer susceptibility to induction of the yeast [PSI+] prion. Cell 106, 183–194 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Derkatch, I. L. et al. Effects of Q/N-rich, polyQ, and non-polyQ amyloids on the de novo formation of the [PSI+]prion in yeast and aggregation of Sup35 in vitro. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 12934–12939 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  130. Derkatch, I. L. et al. Dependence and independence of [PSI+] and [PIN+]: a two-prion system in yeast? EMBO J. 19, 1942–1952 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  131. Bradley, M. E. & Liebman, S. W. Destabilizing interactions among [PSI+] and [PIN+] yeast prion variants. Genetics 165, 1675–1685 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  132. Baker, H. F., Ridley, R. M., Duchen, L. W., Crow, T. J. & Bruton, C. J. Induction of β(A4)-amyloid in primates by injection of Alzheimer's disease brain homogenate. Comparison with transmission of spongiform encephalopathy. Mol. Neurobiol. 8, 25–39 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. Lundmark, K. et al. Transmissibility of systemic amyloidosis by a prion-like mechanism. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 6979–6984 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  134. Xing, Y. et al. Induction of protein conformational change in mouse senile amyloidosis. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 33164–33169 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Prinz, M. et al. Positioning of follicular dendritic cells within the spleen controls prion neuroinvasion. Nature 425, 957–962 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Tanaka, M., Chien, P., Yonekura, K. & Weissman, J. S. Mechanism of cross-species prion transmission; an infectious conformation compatible with two highly divergent yeast prion proteins. Cell 121, 49–62 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. Shorter, J. & Lindquist, S. Hsp104 catalyzes formation and elimination of self-replicating Sup35 prion conformers. Science 304, 1793–1797 (2004). A delineation of how Hsp104 directly regulates Sup35 prion conformers.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Scheibel, T. et al. Conducting nanowires built by controlled self-assembly of amyloid fibres and selective metal deposition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 4527–4532 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  139. Masel, J., Jansen, V. A. & Nowak, M. A. Quantifying the kinetic parameters of prion replication. Biophys. Chem. 77, 139–152 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. Lee, D. H., Granja, J. R., Martinez, J. A., Severin, K. & Ghadiri, M. R. A self-replicating peptide. Nature 382, 525–528 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. Lee, D. H., Severin, K., Yokobayashi, Y. & Ghadiri, M. R. Emergence of symbiosis in peptide self-replication through a hypercyclic network. Nature 390, 591–594 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Saghatelian, A., Yokobayashi, Y., Soltani, K. & Ghadiri, M. R. A chiroselective peptide replicator. Nature 409, 797–801 (2001). References 140–142 describe a remarkable set of short α -helical peptides that can undergo chemical and conformational replication, and which might even help to explain the origins of homochirality.

    Google Scholar 

  143. Pan, K. M. et al. Conversion of α-helices into β-sheets features in the formation of the scrapie prion proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 10962–10966 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  144. Wille, H., Zhang, G. F., Baldwin, M. A., Cohen, F. E. & Prusiner, S. B. Separation of scrapie prion infectivity from PrP amyloid polymers. J. Mol. Biol. 259, 608–621 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. Parsell, D. A., Kowal, A. S., Singer, M. A. & Lindquist, S. Protein disaggregation mediated by heat-shock protein Hsp104. Nature 372, 475–478 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. Glover, J. R. & Lindquist, S. Hsp104, Hsp70, and Hsp40: a novel chaperone system that rescues previously aggregated proteins. Cell 94, 73–82 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. Wegrzyn, R. D., Bapat, K., Newnam, G. P., Zink, A. D. & Chernoff, Y. O. Mechanism of prion loss after Hsp104 inactivation in yeast. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 4656–4669 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  148. Hattendorf, D. A. & Lindquist, S. L. Analysis of the AAA sensor-2 motif in the C-terminal ATPase domain of Hsp104 with a site-specific fluorescent probe of nucleotide binding. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 2732–2737 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  149. Hattendorf, D. A. & Lindquist, S. L. Cooperative kinetics of both Hsp104 ATPase domains and interdomain communication revealed by AAA sensor-1 mutants. EMBO J. 21, 12–21 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  150. Grimminger, V., Richter, K., Imhof, A., Buchner, J. & Walter, S. The prion curing agent guanidinium chloride specifically inhibits ATP hydrolysis by Hsp104. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 7378–7383 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  151. Ripaud, L., Maillet, L. & Cullin, C. The mechanisms of [URE3] prion elimination demonstrate that large aggregates of Ure2p are dead-end products. EMBO J. 22, 5251–5259 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  152. Collins, S. R., Douglass, A., Vale, R. D. & Weissman, J. S. Mechanism of prion propagation: amyloid growth occurs by monomer addition. PLoS Biol. 2, e321 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  153. Inoue, Y., Taguchi, H., Kishimoto, A. & Yoshida, M. Hsp104 binds to yeast Sup35 prion fibre but needs other factor(s) to sever it. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 52319–52323 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  154. Ferreira, P. C., Ness, F., Edwards, S. R., Cox, B. S. & Tuite, M. F. The elimination of the yeast [PSI+] prion by guanidine hydrochloride is the result of Hsp104 inactivation. Mol. Microbiol. 40, 1357–1369 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  155. Shorter, J. & Lindquist, S. Navigating the ClpB channel to solution. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 12, 4–6 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  156. Serio T. R. & Lindquist S. L. Protein-only inheritance in yeast: something to get [PSI+]-ched about. Trends Cell Biol. 10, 98–105 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  157. Leeds, P., Peltz, S. W., Jacobson, A. & Culbertson, M. R. The product of the yeast UPF1 gene is required for rapid turnover of mRNAs containing a premature translational termination codon. Genes Dev. 5, 2303–2314 (1991).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  158. Frischmeyer, P. A. et al. An mRNA surveillance mechanism that eliminates transcripts lacking termination codons. Science 295, 2258–2261 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  159. Bence, N. F., Sampat, R. M. & Kopito, R. R. Impairment of the ubiquitin-proteasome system by protein aggregation. Science 292, 1552–155 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  160. Venkatraman, P., Wetzel, R., Tanaka, M., Nukina, N. & Goldberg, A. L. Eukaryotic proteasomes cannot digest polyglutamine sequences and release them during degradation of polyglutamine-containing proteins. Mol. Cell 14, 95–104 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  161. Castilla, J., Saa, P., Hetz, C. & Soto, C. In vitro generation of infectious scrapie prions. Cell 121, 195–206 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  162. Zou, W. Q. & Gambetti, P. From microbes to prions the final proof of the prion hypothesis. Cell 121, 155–157 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Kent Matlack, Jessica Brown, Todd Sangster, Jens Tyedmers, Walker Jackson, Martin Dünnwald, Sven Heinrich and Ram Krishnan for invaluable comments on the manuscript. J.S. was supported by a Charles A. King Trust post-doctoral fellowship. S.L. was supported by a National Institutes of Health grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to James Shorter or Susan Lindquist.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Related links

Related links

DATABASES

Entrez Protein

anterior open

ApCPEB

brahma

CG5735-PA

CPEB3

Polycomb

polyhomeotic

PrP

TIA1

trithorax

trithorax-like

zeste

OMIM

Alzheimer disease

Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease

Gerstmann-Sträussler-Scheinker syndrome

Huntington disease

kuru

Parkinson disease

type II diabetes

Saccharomyces genome database

Gat1

Gln3

Hsp104

New1

Rnq1

Sis

Snf5

Sup35

Swi1

Ure2

FURTHER INFORMATION

Chronic Wasting Disease Alliance

FoldIndex©

Lindquist laboratory

UK Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy website

Veterinary Services Scrapie Program

Glossary

PHENOTYPIC SPACE

A multi-dimensional continuum of all possible phenotypes.

ADAPTIVE LANDSCAPE

A graph of the average fitness of a population in relation to the frequencies of genotypes in the population.

CONFORMER

Any of two or more isomers that differ only in their three dimensional conformation.

CODICAL DOMAIN

The domain of natural selection dealing solely with self-replicating information as opposed to material entities.

HETEROKARYON

Any cell with more than one nucleus and where the nuclei are not all of the same genetic constitution, or a tissue composed of such cells.

AMYLOID

A general term for protein aggregates that accumulate as fibres of 7–10nm in diameter with common structural features including: β-pleated sheet conformation, resistance to detergents and proteases, and the ability to bind such dyes as Congo red and Thioflavin T and S.

CHAOTROPE

Any substance (usually ions) that increases the transfer of apolar groups to water by decreasing the 'ordered' structure of water. Chaotropes alter secondary, tertiary and quaternary protein structure.

BIOFILM

A proliferation on an inert surface of aggregated microbial colonies that have increased resistance to antimicrobial therapies. Biofilms contribute to many human infections.

SPONGIOSIS

A form of neurodegeneration involving the formation of large fluid-filled spaces (vacuoles) in the brain, which if widespread, induces a sponge-like appearance of the brain. This spongiform change is a general (but not universal) pathological hallmark of prion diseases.

PURIFYING SELECTION

A mode of natural selection that preserves the adapted condition, and is observed as a large excess of synonymous substitutions over non-synonymous substitutions in functionally important genes.

CRYPTIC GENETIC VARIATION

Existing genetic variation that makes no contribution to the normal range of phenotypes, but which can modify phenotypes in response to environmental change or the introduction of novel genetic elements.

ISOGENIC

Describing two or more individuals that possess exactly the same genotype.

VALLEY CROSSING

The process of moving from one adaptive peak to another on an adaptive landscape by crossing a valley. Valleys correspond to genotypic frequencies at which average fitness is low.

ADAPTIVE PEAK

A region in an adaptive landscape corresponding to genotypic frequencies at which the average fitness is high.

MEIOTIC DRIVE

Any process that causes some alleles to be over-represented in gametes formed during meiosis.

EVOLUTIONARY CAPACITOR

An entity (for example, Hsp90) that buffers genotypic variation under neutral conditions, thereby allowing the accumulation of hidden polymorphisms.

LONG-TERM FACILITATION

The long-lasting increase in synaptic activity that contributes to long-term memory and results from prolonged or iterated exposure of synapses to neurotransmitters, which induce the synthesis of new proteins leading to the stabilization of new synaptic connections.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shorter, J., Lindquist, S. Prions as adaptive conduits of memory and inheritance. Nat Rev Genet 6, 435–450 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1616

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1616

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing