Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of an external nasal dilator strip (ENDS) compared to xylometazolin nasal spray

  • Rhinology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nasal blockage is a common complaint in Family Practice. Decongestive nosedrops are frequently employed therapeutic measures. Due to a considerable risk of abuse and side effects, alternatives are wanted. The purpose of this study was to elucidate to what extent ENDS might represent an alternative to decongestive nose sprays (DNS). The effects of DNS (xylometazolin) and ENDS (BreatheRight®) on subjective and objective nasal blockage were compared in 89 patients. Main outcome measures were recordings of nasal symptom scores on visual analogue scales (VAS), minimal cross-sectional areas (MCA) and nasal cavity volumes (NCV) as measured by acoustic rhinometry (AR), and peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF). ENDS significantly increased the MCA and the NCV in the anterior 0.0–3.0 cm of the nose compared to DNS, but had no effect on MCA from 3.0 to 5.4 cm behind the nostrils. In contrast to DNS, ENDS had no effect on the posterior NCV. ENDS and DNS gave comparable increase in nasal inspiratory flow as measured by PNIF, and in the subject’s own experience of nasal obstruction. ENDS may represent an alternative to DNS as a measure against nasal blockage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dahl R (1993) Rhinitis and asthma. In: Mygind N, Naclerio R (eds) Allergic and nonallergic rhinitis. Munksgaard, Copenhagen, pp 184–188

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lofaso F, Coste A, d’Ortho M, Zerah-Lancner F, Delclaux C, Goldenberg F (2000) Nasal obstruction as a risk factor for sleep apnoea syndrome. Eur Respir J 16:639–643

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Craig T, Teets S, Lehman E, Chinchilli V, Zwillich C (1998) Nasal congestion secondary to allergic rhinitis as a cause of sleep disturbance and daytime fatigue and the response to topical nasal corticosteroids. J Allergy Clin Immunol 101:633–637

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lucente F (1989) Rhinitis and nasal obstruction. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2:307–318

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fornadley J (1999) The stuffy nose and rhinitis. Med Clin North Am 83:1–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fadal R (1987) The medical management of rhinitis. In: English G (ed) Otolaryngology. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 1–25

    Google Scholar 

  7. Corey J, Houser S, Bernard A (2000) Nasal congestion: a rewiev of its etiology, evaluation, and treatment. Ear Nose Throat J 79:690–703

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Griffin J, Hunter G, Ferguson D, Sillers M (1997) Physiologic effects of an external nasal dilator. Laryngoscope 107:1235–1238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shaida A, Kenyon G (2000) The nasal valves: changes in anatimy and physiology in normal subjects. Rhinology 38:7–12

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Graf P (1999) Adverse effects of benzalkonium chloride on the nasal mucosa: allergic rhinitis and rhinitis medicamentosa. Clin Ther 21:1749–1755

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hilberg O (2002) Objective measurement of nasal airway dimensions using acoustic rhinometry: methodological and clinical aspects. Allergy 57:5–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. O’Kroy J, James T, Miller J, Torok D, Campbell K (2001) Effects of an external nasal dilator on the work of breathing during exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33:454–458

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kirkness J, Wheatley J, Amis T (2000) Nasal airflow dynamics: mechanisms and responses associated with an external nasal dilator strip. Eur Respir J 15:929–936

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wihl J-A, Malm L 1988 Rhinomanometry and nasal peak expiratory and inspiratory flow rate. Ann Allergy 6:50–55

    Google Scholar 

  15. Taverner D, Bickford L, Latte J (2002) Validation by fluid volume of acoustic rhinometry before and after decongestant in normal subjects. Rhinology 40:135–140

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lorino A, Lofaso F, Drogou I, Abi-Nader F, Dahan E, Coste A 1998 Effects of different mechanical treatments on nasal resistance assessed by rhinometry. Chest 114:166–167

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Clark R, Jones A, Richardson H (1995) Peak nasal inspiratory flow-the plateau effect. J Laryngol Otol 109:399–402

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pevernaige D, Hamans E, Van Cauvenberge P, Pauwels R (2000) External nasal dilatation reduces snoring in chronic rhinitis patients: a randomized controlled trial. Eur Respir J 15:996–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Slavin R (1994) Sinopulmonary relationships. Am J Otolaryngol 15:18–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. DuBuske L (1999) The link between allergy and asthma. Allergy Asthma Proc 20:341–345

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Vermoen C, Verbraak A, Bogaard J (1998) Effect of a nasal dilator on nasal patency during normal and forced nasal breathing. Int J Sports Med 19:109–913

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. K. Steinsvåg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Høyvoll, L.R., Lunde, K., Li, H.S. et al. Effects of an external nasal dilator strip (ENDS) compared to xylometazolin nasal spray. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 264, 1289–1294 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-007-0345-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-007-0345-6

Keywords

Navigation